Browse over 9,000 car reviews
The Skoda Fabia is the Czech brand’s alternative to the Volkswagen Polo.
The Fabia small hatch has been around since 2007 but didn’t launch in Australia until 2011.
It was initially offered as a 77kW 1.2-litre turbo, before a more powerful and sporty RS variant arrived a year later, as well as a wagon bodystyle. Now in its second generation locally, it shares a platform with the Volkswagen Polo.
The Fabia can currently be had from $32,390 for the Fabia Select 85TSI and reaches to $39,690 for the Fabia Monte Carlo 110TSI.
The Fabia competes with other small hatches like the Renault Clio, Mazda2 and Suzuki Swift.
Despite the Skoda badge, there’s an awful lot of Volkswagen engineering in the Fabia. In fact, as part of the broader VW family, all modern Skodas have essentially VW platforms, engines and transmissions fitted to them.
It will come as no surprise to many VW owners that the engines and transmissions of the era of your car were more problematic than they should have been. Many Golf and Polo owners have found out the hard way that the 1.4 twin-charger engine (in particular) was prone to problems and early failures of components including the timing chain.
If caught within the warranty period, these components should have been changed by Skoda as part of its warranty responsibilities, but ten years down the track, the picture is a lot blurrier. The way to proceed is to approach Skoda Australia’s customer service department and explain the situation. Perhaps the company will help with the cost of repairs on a pro-rata basis (given the low mileage your car has covered) but don’t count on it. You also have recourse to the ACCC on the basis that the car was not of an acceptable quality or fit for purpose (this would probably need to be independently verified).
Meanwhile, the short answer is that 48,000km of normal use would not be considered to be an acceptable lifespan for a component such as an engine’s timing chain. Timing chains are designed to last the entire life of the engine. But in too many cases, we’re seeing that that simply isn’t the case.
Show more
Your situation may be caused any one (or more) of about a thousand faults that is making the car’s on-board computer think that there’s a major problem. In turn, the computer switches the engine to operate on minimal power to make it home without destroying or further damaging any component. A car’s limp-home mode system is triggered by a range of protocols that are acted upon whenever the car perceives a drama. Anything from low oil level to a hot transmission can cause the limp-home system to intervene, and it can be an actual fault or, sometimes, simply an erroneous signal from a sensor that isn’t telling the truth. Have the car scanned and see what error codes are produced.
Show more
I think that a Kia Rio would be an excellent choice as a first car. Especially since a Rio built in the time frame you’re looking at will still have a big chunk of its factory warranty left to run. The Kia seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty is the best around, really, and provided the car you buy has a complete service record, that warranty will be real peace of mind.
Also, the Rio is known to be a good, solid car that has a good reputation for reliability and durability. The Skoda Fabia, meantime, suffers from the poor reputation of is dual-clutch transmission. The Fabia is also a bit of an orphan in Australia, meaning that it’s largely overlooked by buyers. That means it will potentially be more difficult to unload when you daughter looks to upgrade her car in a few years.
Show more
The Fabia's boot comes in at 380 litres with the second row up, or 1190L with rear seats folded.
The Skoda Fabia's interior is, depending on the grade, either fairly standard for a European car (in Select) or quite 'racey' (for the Monte Carlo.
The materials are mostly plastic, as is standard for a light car, but thoughtful touches like an umbrella in the door elevate the Fabia above rivals in a practicality sense.
The Select features a turbocharged 1.0-litre three-cylinder petrol engine with 85kW and 200Nm, mated to a 7-speed dual-clutch (DSG) transmission.
The Monta Carlo has a larger 1.5-litre, four-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine, with 110kW and 250Nm, and the same transmission.
Both variants are front-wheel drive.
The Fabia has an 8.25-inch multimedia touchscreen, with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, an 8.0-inch driver display, two USB-C ports, plus drive mode selection and a host of safety features (covered later in this review).
There's also a leather ‘sports’ steering wheel, automatic windscreen wipers, an auto-dimming rear-view mirror and auto LED headlights and LED taillights.
The Monte Carlo gets a larger 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster, and a 9.2-inch multimedia touchscreen, plus wireless device charging.
The Skoda Fabia has a standard five-seat layout, with different seat materials depending on the grade.
The front seats are standard fabric, manual adjust in the Select, or heated leather sports seats in the Monte Carlo.
The Skoda Fabia Select should hit 100km/h in under 10.0 seconds, just, in Select guise, or 8.0 seconds in Monta Carlo form.
The Fabia has a 5.0L/100km fuel consumption figure in Select guise, with a minimum 95RON fuel grade and a 42-litre fuel tank. You could hypothetically expect to cover a touch more than 800km before running out of fuel, though that seems unlikely.
The Monte Carlo has a 5.3L/100km claim, a 40-litre tank, and the same 95RON minimum.