Audi R8 vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT

What's the difference?

The Audi R8 V10 RWD and V10 Performance Quattro have their own personalities. I'm a big fan of the lower-powered rear-wheel drive car, but the Performance is the ultimate here with better brakes and that 330km/h top speed. Either way the R8 is a true supercar, but one that doesn't have to be driven gingerly as though something may break off.

The GT63 4Matic+ is a breathtaking example of everything that Mercedes-Benz and AMG are.

Ferociously fast, incredibly agile and superbly sophisticated, it should be on anybody’s shortlist, if that also includes a Porsche, Aston Martin, Maserati or even a Lamborghini. And it’s definitely much more than yesterday’s SLC ever was – for similar money in today’s terms, as it turns out.

But, around Tasmania’s glorious roads at least, the Mercedes-AMG lacks the ride comfort and road noise isolation to be a fully-rounded-out GT, and that’s a disappointment for a brand with such formidable history in making such cars.

Lamborghini styling can look over the top, McLarens can sometimes appear delicate and fragile, and Ferraris seem to be everywhere, and even for me, begin to blend into one.

The R8, though, looks exactly how an Audi supercar should look – understated, tough and serious. Have you seen that Audi advert with the R8 on a dyno not wearing any pants? That sounds ridiculous but Google it because it sums up what the R8 is – a real car with a raw race car underneath, that's meant to be driven comfortably on the road and hard on a race track and the styling indicates that intent with little in the way of fanfare.

Well, there is that big window at the back which shows off the engine and the 'side blades' that surround the large vents carved into the side of the car to cool the engine.

The latest update has taken the design from the second-gen car which arrived in 2016 and added a new grille, front bumper, door sills and vents in the rear bumper. It's a more angular, sharper, and busier design with more vents and winglets than ever.

The R8 V10 RWD and R8 V10 Performance are close to identical in their styling. You can pick the Performance by its gloss carbon front spoiler, side sills, mirror caps and rear diffuser. The RWD has gloss black elements instead.

Which looks best: the Coupe or Spyder? That's a personal thing, but I reckon race cars need to have a hardtop roof, so it's the coupe for me, please.

Built using the 'Audi Space Frame' which weighs only 200kg, the R8 is 4426mm long and just 1240mm tall, but at 1940mm across it has a wide, planted stance.

This is still clearly a Mercedes AMG GT coupe, like the 2014 C190 original, but a ground-up redesign sees it subtly yet significantly altered.

Some 270kg heavier than before, the larger-in-every-dimension body combines aluminium, steel, magnesium and fibre composite materials for improved rigidity and a lower centre of gravity. Length (4729mm) and wheelbase (2700mm) have been stretched by 177mm and 70mm respectively. Width (1984mm) and height (1352mm) are also up.

The nose treatment is similar to before, especially with the bulgy bonnet and signature vertical slatted grille fitted. These, combined with the LED digital headlight shape effect, is reminiscent of, but far-better executed than, the goofy-looking MG5’s face.

Underneath, it's an all-new platform shared with the SL, with the rear transaxle of the old car replaced by a permanent AWD system, leading from 46:54 front/rear weight distribution to 50:50 as a result.

That aggressive, exaggerated cab-backward/ultra-long bonnet silhouette that visually connected it with the SLS gives way to more-conventional and practical coupe proportions that is striking if not especially original, since they do look quite 911-esque. Along with the longer wheelbase and wider tracks, the result allows for two small rear seats to be fitted, while liftback cargo access remains.

Similarly, in the name of way-more usable interior packaging, Mercedes-AMG says it pushed the driving position nearly 180mm forward compared to the previous GT. Let’s see what that all looks like inside.

The R8 is a two-seater supercar and practicality isn't high on its 'to do' list with limited cabin storage in the form door pockets almost as small as my jeans pockets, two cupholders hiding under a trapdoor in the centre armrest, a hidey hole in front of the shifter containing a wireless charger and two USB ports and the glove box.

As for the boot – there are two: one in the nose with a 112-litre cargo capacity and another behind the mid-mounted engine with 226 litres.

Room for people, well you and a friend, is excellent. I'm 191cm (6'3") tall with a 2.0m wingspan and found the footwell deep and spacious, while head and shoulder room is also good.

The first impression inside is that of space, despite the falling roofline and coupe-like upsweep of the side windows and you look back. While, again, similar to a 911s, a kink at the door gives the GT a unique character.

Even larger people will appreciate the generous amounts of room up front, with space to stretch, sat in sumptuously comfy bucket seats. Note that the standard ones are better than the racier but firmer Sports versions.

The driving position is perfect, ahead of a dashboard that is very typical modern Mercedes in appearance and layout.

To that end, the tablet-style integrated touchscreen (11.9 inches) is clear, fast and intuitive once time is taken to learn it. And points are also won for the multi-configurable electronic instrumentation, that allows for a variety of screens, including track, classic and minimalist views.

The trademark turbine air vents, the quite beautiful material and trim finishes and just the general solid feel are further typical contemporary Mercedes cabin treatments, as are the excellent ventilation and ample storage options.

And while rear vision isn't great, that's what cameras are for. It's all pretty much on brand.

It is a shame, given how elevated the Mercedes-AMG engineering is underneath, that the GT’s interior look and ambience is so similar to those of a (albeit higher-spec) C-Class or GLE. It's simply not as special as some of the company’s previous sports cars.

More annoyingly, the ride is too firm and bumpy for a GT, and this has the unhappy effect of provoking random rattly trim sounds within the cabin. It’s a bit like scrunched-up cellophane. In a $420K (as tested) Merc, that’s very disappointing, especially as it can be heard over the copious amount of road and tyre noise droning through, particularly on coarser bitumen surfaces.

Further back, the rear seat is strictly two-plus-two, and nobody over 150cm tall is recommended to travel there by Mercedes itself. That sloping roofline is the culprit. That said, brief trips with a bowed head are possible, as the fixed cushions and split-folding backrests are actually surprisingly comfy. But only for short journeys. Kids should love it though, and the second row does open up the GT’s usefulness enormously.

As does a near-doubling of the AMG’s cargo capacity, jumping 146 litres to 321L with backrests erect, to a whopping 675L (+325L) in two-seater mode. The flat floor is accessed via a large electrically-operated liftback door, offering quite a large aperture for easy loading/unloading.

Having no spare wheel helps here, with a tyre inflation kit included in lieu of that.

Meanwhile, at the front, under the bonnet, things have definitely changed for the better as well.

Starting from $370,400 (all prices are before on-road costs), the Mercedes-AMG GT63 4Matic+ is priced and positioned as something of an eagle amongst some pretty delectable doves, given its combination of four seats, 430kW of power, 800Nm of torque and four-wheel drive.

No rival equivalents can match the Mercedes on paper. The 398kW/610Nm 911 Carrera 4 GTS T-Hybrid offers less power but starts from $400,000-plus. The 410kW/650Nm GranTurismo Trofeo begins at $450K, the 500kW/800Nm DB12 from $455K and the 404kW/470Nm Continental GT from $460K.

Only the 460kW/750Nm BMW M8 Competition comes closest to the Mercedes-AMG, from $380K.

Side note, today’s GT is only slightly more expensive than what the 450SLC was nearly half a century ago when adjusted for inflation.

And, just like with that classic old Benz, it shares much with the brand’s legendary SL convertible stablemate – including, in this case, standard all-wheel drive and active rear-axle steering… aka 4WS to select third and fourth-generation Honda Prelude owners out there.

What else does $400K-plus buy you? As you’d expect, the GT63 4Matic+ comes choc-full of standard equipment, much of it typical of the luxury coupe breed, with leather-covered and electrically operated everything.

How about a front-axle lift system with GPS-enabled memory that automatically raises the GT’s nose to help clear bumps and then remembers to do so next time?

There are climate-controlled AMG sports seats with inflatable bolstering and massaging functionality, a fixed glass roof, a head-up display, augmented-reality satellite navigation, 360-degree surround views, performance telemetry data as part of an extensive multimedia system, an 11.9-inch portrait touchscreen, 11-speaker Burmester audio, a handsfree-powered tailgate, 21-inch alloys and cutting-edge driver-assist safety tech. More on that in the Safety section below.

Then there are the myriad option packs, bumping the GT63’s price up towards $500,000. These include a $2.7K seat trim package; a $10K AMG Night Package that adds darker trim treatments (often where chrome was); an aerodynamics package with fixed spoiler replacing the standard active spoiler; a $2.6K AMG Performance Seat package; a $13K Carbon Fibre package and $13.2K Ceramic Brakes.

Now, while the new GT does ditch the previous model’s unique rear transaxle spaceframe pioneered by the gull-winged SLS of the early 2010s, the resulting longer wheelbase and shorter overhangs do provide less outlandish and more practical design.

Let’s check that out in more detail. 

There are two grades in the Audi R8 range – the entry-point R8 V10 RWD which has rear-wheel drive (RWD), and the R8 V10 Performance Quattro which has all-wheel drive (AWD).

Both obviously have V10 engines, it's a naturally aspirated 5.2-litre petrol unit (so no turbos here), but the RWD makes less power and torque at 397kW and 540Nm, while the Performance produces 449kW and 560Nm.

The V10 is mounted behind the driver's seat but ahead of the rear axle making it mid-engined car. The engine even has its own window and you can see it in there with its face pressed up against the glass.

There are two body styles as well – the Coupe and Spyder (convertible, roadster, just another word for a retractable soft roof). We'll get to the prices in the next section, but let's talk about the more interesting numbers such as top speeds.

The V10 RWD in coupe form can reach 324km/h and the Spyder can hit 322km/h while the V10 Performance Coupe and Spyder are both a smidge quicker at 330km/h.

Those are all go-straight-to-jail speeds in Australia, so if you're tempted to fact check my numbers then do it on a racetrack. Audi holds excellent track days – I've done them and you'll not only get to drive the R8 as fast as you can, the instructors will help you improve your advanced driving skills, too. Do it, it could save your life.

Acceleration from 0-100km/h is rapid – 3.7 seconds and 3.8 seconds for the V10 RWD Coupe and Spyder respectively, while the V10 Performance Coupe and Spyder can nail it in 3.2 seconds and 3.3 seconds.

The V10 engine has a cylinder-on-demand feature which can shut down five of the cylinders while cruising on a motorway, say at 110km/h. It's a fuel-saving system, but keep in mind this V10 loves petrol and lots of it – I've hidden that all the way down the bottom of this review.

Shifting gears in all R8s is a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission.

There’s a plaque signifying which engineer “handcrafted” the GT’s engine – in this case, the famous M177 in 3982cc, 4.0-litre twin-turbo intercooled V8 petrol guise.

Delivering 430kW of power at 6500rpm and 800Nm of torque from 2500-4500rpm, it sends drive to all four wheels via a nine-speed multi-clutch transmission (dubbed MCT in AMG-speak), catapulting the GT63 4Matic+ from 0-100km/h in just 3.2 seconds, on the way to a top speed of 315km/h.

How does it do that?

With AWD, the GT is now nearly 15 per cent heavier than before, but it still manages a punchy 218kW/tonne. Active aerodynamics over, inside and under a more-rigid body structure also helps.

The AMG 4Matic+ AWD system goes from 50/50 front/rear, to 100 per cent rear, variable torque distribution according to conditions and settings, and backed up by an electronic limited-slip differential. Among the many driving settings are Race Start, Drift Mode and good-old Comfort, if it all becomes too much.

Also keeping all that performance in check is a high-performance composite brake setup with improved cooling for faster responses.

Interlinked active roll bars improve body control, the five-link independent suspension features adaptive dampers for a softer ride.

And, as for that 4WS tech, the rear wheels steer opposite to the fronts at up to 100km/h (by some 2.5 degrees) for tighter and tidier handling, or 0.7 degrees in the same direction above 100, for greater stability and road-holding.

Its effect on the way this near-two-tonne coupe zigs and zags around corners is something you need to experience to really appreciate.

That's like asking how many calories are in this pavlova that I'm about to push into my mouth? Seriously if you're asking then you shouldn't be eating it – or driving the R8.

But just for the record, according to Audi the RWD R8 uses 12.0L/100km in Coupe form and 12.2L/100km in Spyder guise after a combination of urban and open roads, while the AWD R8 of course will use more at 13.4L/100km for both Coupe and Spyder.

Actually, the GT’s economy isn’t horrendous considering how fast it can go.

Even blasting a few times around beckoning country roads, we managed an indicated 13.0L/100km, which is an improvement on what Mercedes-AMG says the GT averages the 14.6L/100km average that Mercedes-AMG officially states.

That translates to a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 334g/km.

Using 98 RON premium unleaded petrol, an average of just under 480km between refills of the 70L tank is possible. The urban run sees consumption rocket to 21.8L/100km (for just 321km of range), or 10.4 out on the highway run, meaning that over 670km is possible should you decide to drive in a docile manner.

A race circuit is the best place to test the performance of an Audi R8. I've been lucky enough to have done this in the past, but for this update of the R8 the Australian launch was held on public roads and included a convoy of RS models such as the RS 6 Avant, RS 7, RS Q3 and TT RS.

Even then I think I was 'stitched up' because I began the day in the R8 V10 Performance Coupe but spent almost the entirety of my allocated time in roadworks at 40km/h before swapping to an RS Q3.

So, while I can't honesty comment about the dynamics on this updated R8 V10 Performance Coupe I can tell you that having driven every iteration of the R8 since 2012 that it's a weapon, with helicopter-like visibility out of that large front window.

If, like me, you think turbos are 'cheating' (superchargers are fine), then you'll love the linear power delivery of the R8's naturally aspirated V10, and while I love front-engined sportscars, nothing beats a mid-engined car for the feeling of balance and lightness in the nose while having the sound of thousands of explosions going off just behind your back.

Having AWD is not just great for acceleration and perfect traction from Audi's quattro system, I think it's a good safety feature in a supercar, and while only your judgements can stop things going pear shaped, the system will be there to help on slippery roads.

The following day was different. I was in the R8 V10 RWD, the country roads were superb and while it wasn't a racetrack it was enough to get a hint of the capabilities of the RWD R8.

While the R8 V10 RWD feels the same to sit in with the same great view, it feels different to drive than its faster sibling, in a good way. First there's the noticeable power difference – more than 50kW and 20Nm less – but also the lack of AWD makes the front end feel more pointable, and the car feel more like a traditional sportscar that pushes from behind rather than pulling from the front. Less power, but more fun.

The RS cars in our test convoy were all awesome machines, but stepping out of even the RS6 Avant and slipping down into the R8 cockpit was like getting into a UFO – it's so far ahead dynamically of any other Audi that all I could do was laugh like an idiot. Corners which were making an RS 7 really struggle, were handled effortlessly by the R8. And in a straight line it's a bullet in a barrel.

The Performance has the better brakes: 380mm ceramic discs with six piston calipers up front and 356mm discs with four piston calipers at the rear. The RWD has steel discs – 365mm with eight piston calipers up front and 356mm discs with four piston calipers in the rear.

Keep in mind if you are planning on track days, you'll find the ceramic discs costly to replace, and beside the stopping power of the steel ones is excellent.

And yet, on pot holed course bitumen the ride is a lot more comfortable than you might think and having driven the Performance in traffic it's a much nicer place to sit than the claustrophobic cabin of a McLaren 570S. You could honestly use the R8 daily.

Nobody will drive the GT63 4Matic+ and think, ‘Oh, this is OK’, because its breadth of performance is phenomenal.

No matter which mode you're in, from Comfort through to track-tuned Race, the Mercedes-AMG blends forceful pace and commanding control without ever breaking a sweat.

Flex your right foot and the two-tonne coupe bounds into action like a giant on a mission, striding past posted speed limit signs in nanoseconds and way, way faster than the law will stand if diligence isn’t exercised.

And there’s no point relying on seat-of-your-pants sensations, either, because the chassis below embraces the road with an almost zealous devotion. Which is astounding, given how agile the four-wheel steering-enhanced handling is.

The 63’s super power is exactly that – it dulls your sense of speed. One tester admitted to exceeding 150km/h before noticing. An odd confession considering the sonic boombox that is the bi-turbo V8’s howl.

But jailbait performance is not even the 63’s most lingering joy. That would be its steering perfection, that delivers that rare trifecta of keenness, crispness and communication. The wheel feels eager and alive in your hands, even when powering between tight turns, backed up by sensational grip and control. How can a two-tonne GT handle so sharply?

Warm, dry roads were the order of the day, so we can’t tell you how the 4Matic+ permanent AWD system deals with wet or slippery surfaces, but the slick multi-clutch transmission, seamless torque-vectoring tech and sticky tyres more than cope with the 63’s formidable outputs.

So, that's the gushing part out the way, then.

Despite the adaptive dampers, rigid architecture and exquisitely sophisticated suspension, the ride is simply too stiff in Comfort mode, and downright jittery on some of the Tasmanian roads we tested on, for the 63 to be considered a true luxury grand tourer. It just isn't comfortable, luxurious or supple enough.

Plus, grippy as they are, the 21-inch wheels transmit too much road and tyre noise through to the cabin, meaning that the GT isn't as quiet as you'd hope. Add the aforementioned trim squeaks, and the expected cocooned silence isn’t always there.

The upshot is that the 63 possesses more of a sports car character than a luxury GT character. Great news if you're a 911 type buyer and are seeking a high-performance 2+2 alternative, but a disappointment if comfort and refinement are priorities.

Still, it is impossible not to be deeply moved by this Mercedes-AMG.

While the GT doesn’t score an ANCAP rating – probably because it’s too expensive to crash test – we’d wager that it would be above-average, given Benz’s track record as a pioneer in this field.

That’d due to the scores of active, passive and driver-assist safety features fitted, from multi-faceted autonomous emergency braking (AEB) and lane-support systems to Mercedes’ PRE-SAFE tech that anticipates a crash and then prepares the car for impact.

More specifically, the GT includes Active Lane Change/Keep Assist, adaptive high beam as part of its megapixel LED set-up, adaptive cruise control, Cross-Traffic Assist, Evasive manoeuvre support, an emergency services call-out system, 360-degree camera views, pedestrian protection bonnet and eight airbags.

In other Mercedes products of today, AEB operating parameters are 7-80km/h for vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, and from 7-250km/h for vehicle-to-vehicle, while the lane-keep support systems operate between 60-200km/h.

Finally, there are ISOFIX child-seat anchorages in the front passenger seat and two in the rear seats.

The R8 is covered by Audi's three-year, unlimited kilometre warranty which not only falls behind in duration compared to mainstream brands but also its direct rival Mercedes-Benz which now has five-year, unlimited kilometre coverage.

Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km but unlike other Audi models there isn't a three-year or five-year plan available.

What’s the GT like to own?

Mercedes-Benz offers a five-year/unlimited km warranty, with five years of roadside assistance. This is average for most mainstream and luxury brands, but superior to most sports-car makers like Porsche and Lamborghini.

Intervals are every 12 months or 20,000km, and while no capped-priced servicing is offered on the GT, pre-paid three-, four- or five-year service plans are available, ranging from $5165, $7700 and $8665 respectively.

Big performance demands big maintenance bills, it seems.