2018 Mazda CX-5 vs Toyota RAV4

What's the difference?

The CX-5 GT is a triumph of style and substance. The range is generally a tremendous value-for-money line-up and this upper-echelon offering is no different because a GT buyer will want for nothing – except perhaps Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and if we can live without those, you can too. More of a city-friendly SUV than a rough-and-ready off-roader, the GT is still capable of getting you to where you want to go, as long as you have a realistic notion of AWD-suitable terrain: think formed trails, well-maintained National Parks tracks and perhaps even, at a stretch, very firm sand.

Is the CX-5 a legitimate Adventure vehicle, or should it stay in the suburbs? Tell us what you think the comments below.

The diesel GX doesn't appear to be especially good value because it probably isn't. A $41,000 car with steel wheels and a cloth interior (even though I like it) is really pushing it on the value front. Added to that the lack of engine features, like stop-start, and a media system from the 21st century, you have to wonder where the money has gone. Wonder no more - it's all in the safety gear, which as a package is hard to beat at this price level.

For not much less, though, you can have the mid-spec GXL petrol and have mostly the same experience along with the now-standard safety tech... and a set of alloy wheels.

People who know me, know that I put more stock in what’s under the bonnet than appearance but, having said that, I am still capable of appreciating attractive things. The previous version of the CX-5 looked good; this new one looks damn good. Everything is simply neater, sleeker and more streamlined than before, inside and outside.

Fit and finish is tighter and all materials and designs complement, rather than clash with, each other. That bright white leather – adding a real overall touch of class – doesn’t hurt either.

This CX-5 looks and feels like it sits more comfortably in the realm of sports cars than that of family-friendly SUVs – but I spend zero time in sport cars, so what do I know?

A lot has changed in 23 years, including Toyota's consumption of bravery pills. While it's not an especially courageous design, the RAV is the sharpest and most handsome it has ever been. To be completely fair, the RAV has usually been a bit more interesting than most Toyotas, but this one is sharp and well-judged, clearly linked to the C-HR and newer Kluger models.

It manages to look very under-wheeled with the steel rims and therefore looks higher than it really is, which is a shame, because it's an otherwise handsome design. The front end is particularly well-executed and gets better with familiarity.

Thankfully, it goes without the awful bonnet scoop of past diesel RAV4s, too.

Here in the cheaper seats, it's a bit bleak. The RAV's interior design is already looking a little dated but you can't argue with its functionality. It's quite grey and plasticky here in the GX but there's no shame in the cloth trim, which if you ask me isn't available in enough cars.

From the front to the back everything is pretty well suited for day-to-day life.

There is ample room for driver and passenger up front with electric adjustment for those forward pews.

Second-row travellers also get stacks of leg and headroom and the driver seat goes nowhere near encroaching on space behind. When it comes time to collapse those second-row seats, it is a 40/20/40 split.

Storage solutions include a space for phones and loose change in front of the shifter, four cupholders (two up front and a pair in the second-row centre arm-rest), and a bottle-recess in each door. Annoyingly, there are two USB ports in the glovebox, which is deep enough for a dog to sit in (only joking!), so it is difficult for the driver to readily access those as a charging point.

There are air vents for both rows.

Down the back, cargo space is 442 litres with the second row up; and 1342 litres with that row flat.

The RAV is a spacious machine, with good headroom and legroom for both front and rear passengers. It's not too high that you have to consciously climb in and you can fit three kids across the back without drama.

Front and rear passengers each score a pair of cupholders, bringing the total to four, matched by the bottle holder count. 

Boot space starts with a pretty decent 550 litres and with the 60/40 split fold seats dropped forward, ends up at a whopping 1760L.

The RAV4 GX is the entry-level and you can have it with three engines - a 2.0-litre petrol, a 2.5-litre petrol and a 2.2-litre turbo-diesel. You can have a manual or auto unless you pick the 2.5, which is auto-only. Strictly speaking, the 2.0's auto is a CVT and drives only the front wheels, whereas the big-banger 2.5 and the turbo-diesel are all-wheel drive.

I had the 2.2-litre turbo-diesel automatic for a week. For $41,100, a sturdy $2350 more than the 2017 model, you get 17-inch steel wheels, dual-zone climate control, a six-speaker stereo with a 6.1-inch touch screen and DAB+ radio, reversing camera, sat nav, front and rear parking sensors, auto LED headlights and auto wipers, active cruise control, cloth trim and a space-saver spare.

New for the 2018 model is standard sat nav and a the advanced safety gear previously only available on the top-of-the-range Cruiser. Our car also had the full-size spare, a $300 steel wheel under the boot floor.

The GT has a 2.2-litre SkyActiv diesel engine – producing 129kW@4500rpm and a chunky 420Nm@2000rpm – matched to a six-speed automatic transmission. No complaints about this pairing.

I know Toyota fans are fond of engine codes, so I can tell you that the diesel RAV4 is equipped with a 2AD-FHV 2.2-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel developing 110kW and 340Nm.

The GX diesel is a reasonably hefty 1635kg and can tow 1200kg braked and 750kg unbraked.

We recorded 8.3L/100km for about 160km of daily driving (country, suburban, city and freeway) and 8.7L/100km for 150km of AWD-appropriate touring (including a substantial amount of dirt-road driving). The CX-5 has a 58-litre fuel tank

Toyota's combined fuel figure is listed at 6.7L/100km which is a little way off the 8.7L/100km I managed in a mix of suburban and highway driving. To be fair, the highway average was showing an indicated 6.2L/100km, which is pretty close to the claimed figure.

This CX-5 is 4550mm long, 1840mm wide, 1675mm high has a claimed kerb weight of 1744kg and an 11.2m turning circle. It feels low and long – even though it’s not really – and is rock-steady to drive, at any speed.

This CX-5 never feels like anything but a supremely well put-together unit and that makes for a smooth driving experience. Steering is light at the right time and takes on a real weight when you need it to; the 2.2-litre engine is eager and works well off changes in the six-speed auto.

It’s better suited to open-road cruising, than stop-start city driving as it tends to lag off the mark when you actually need it to swiftly budge.

Mazda reckons its staff have worked hard to make the current CX-5’s NVH (noise, vibration, harshness) levels much better than those in the previous model, but we’d never noticed anything in that earlier thing, and nothing in this latest model, so we have to take their word for it.

The GT is on 19-inch alloys, shod with Toyo Proxes R46 rubber.

Stepping out into the suburbs, the diesel RAV is a noisy beast. Most oil-burning medium SUVs manage to keep a lid on the racket of a diesel but the Toyota's is loud and proud. Low-rev clatter, noisy on start-up, this is old school.

Once you get going, though, the engine improves and by the time you're in the cruise zone, it's a happy camper. Only when you go for an overtake does it again invade the cabin with more noise than is probably absolutely necessary.

It is undeniably torquey, though, meaning a fairly relaxed drive. It's not a particularly sprightly thing, so if there is turbo lag, you don't really notice it. The diesel RAV doesn't really respond positively to a flattened throttle, so a gently-as-she goes approach ensures solid progress.

Which is probably just as well, because the ride and handling is a bit wooden. My view on this caused a bit of tension in Casa Anderson because my wife didn't agree. Well, I say tension, she just told me I was wrong. However, if you approach a corner at anything much higher than pensioner-on-the-way-to-the-bowlo speed, expect less than stellar steering and chassis response. The ride isn't all that flash, either, struggling to keep up with a dud road, the rear seemingly stiffly sprung. It's not unsettling and never, ever bad, but the RAV isn't up to the challenge the way a CX-5 or Tucson is and certainly not the similarly-priced VW Tiguan.

The RAV leaves its Japanese factory with seven airbags, ABS, stability and traction controls, auto high beam, forward collision warning, front AEB, sway warning, lane-keep assist, three top-tether anchors and two ISOFIX points.

It received a five-star ANCAP rating, the highest available, in 2016.

Much of the safety package was previously an option, but is now standard across the whole range.

Mazda offers a three-year/unlimited kilometre warranty on the CX-5; capped price servicing is included. The servicing schedule is set at six months/10,000km and will cost from $317 to $387.

Toyota offers a three-year/100,000km warranty and servicing happens every six months or 10,000km. 

Toyota's lovably simple capped-price servicing ensures you won't pay more than $240 per service on the diesel engine, $60 more than on the petrol. The scheme runs for the first three years/60,000km of the car's life.

Roadside assist starts at $78 per year.