Polestar 4 vs Toyota Prado

What's the difference?

Polestar may be a Tesla rival but the Polestar 4 looks and feels much more premium than the Model Y. The brand has taken its time to get the cabin just right and the sustainable materials don’t feel cheap in any way. In fact, this car feels special.

I may not be a fan of some of the tech - the digital rear-view mirror, for example - but many people will be drawn to the car because of these features.

On the road, the Polestar 4 is a cracking EV, with excellent driving range and a fun factor that can’t be denied. That aftersales offer is just the cherry on the cake.

This is Polestar’s best chance yet of being accepted by the masses.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

While no doubt the hybrid would appeal to some buyers, given the limits in towing capacity and higher fuel consumption, the extra performance doesn’t really make the i-Force Max a compelling proposition for the LandCruiser/Prado. Australian buyers have made it abundantly clear they’re happy with the Prado already on sale, so it’s hard to see the hybrid having too much success here alongside the diesel engine.

Polestar pitches itself as a design-led brand and so far that checks out. The Polestar 2 is a striking sedan, the 3 is a bold, boxy, big SUV and now the 4 is the latest sexy addition to the range.

As mentioned, it is technically a medium SUV but it has a distinct fastback look. Polestar calls it a coupe-SUV. Whatever it is, it looks smashing in the metal.

The sleek silhouette pairs nicely with the split LED headlights and low-set front end. While there is an elevated ride height, it manages to sit low enough to the ground to look sporty.

The most interesting angle of the Polestar 4 is the rear. This car does not have a rear windscreen. The tailgate is made up of aluminium panels instead of glass, but the massive panoramic roof stretches back to the top of the tailgate.

The squared-off rear sits up high and houses gorgeous tail-lights that span the width of the car. Even though the rear is controversial given the lack of window, it’s probably the Polestar’s best angle. It’s unique and striking.

The Polestar 4’s interior design is best described as stylish minimalism. It is much more interesting than Tesla’s appliance-like cabin design, and it’s clear a lot of thought has gone into the interior. There are virtually no buttons which helps the look, but that can impact practicality. 

The integrated air vents look stunning as does the flat-bottom steering wheel.

A mix of whites, and light and dark grey materials are broken up by pops of colour like gold seatbelts. 

Recycled material is found throughout including the floor mats, dash toppers and seat upholstery, some of which is inspired by the fashion and sportswear industries. But being Polestar, it’s with a sustainable twist.

The Prado and LandCruiser largely look the same, but the 1958 we drove did have a few standout elements from a design perspective.

The most obvious are the retro round headlights of the 1958, which are meant to hark back to the original FJ Cruiser. The retro theme is helped by the round light framing the large rectangular mesh grille with ‘TOYOTA’ in big, bold letters.

Personally, I really like the round lights and think it’s a shame the Australian-bound Prado misses out, purely for the aesthetics.

Inside the cabin also feels like a throwback in time, but not to the 1950s, rather the late ‘80s and early ‘90s with the grey cloth trim. It’s a brave decision from Toyota to ditch a more modern look and feel, but, again, I really like it. It feels hard-wearing and suits the nature of the Land Cruiser in the US market, where it has to woo buyers away from Bronco and Wrangler.

One design choice of note is the US-spec version has ‘LandCruiser’ embossed on the dashboard ahead of the passenger, something else we miss out on here with our Prado.

Sliding into the driver’s seat, the first thing I notice is how high the centre console sits. This is clearly a Polestar thing because it’s similar to the 2. This adds to the sporty feel of the cabin, but I don’t know if it needs to be that high.

It does however liberate a massive amount of storage space under the console. You could fit a handbag, shoes or other items there, and Polestar offers accessories like bicycle-esque bottle holders. 

There’s more storage in the smallish central bin which also houses two USB-C ports, a half-hidden phone charging pad, and door bins that will fit a larger bottle, but only lying down.

The seats are comfortable and the cloth-like sustainable material in the Singe Motor grade looks great, but it can grip on to clothes a little. The perforated Zinc-coloured ‘animal welfare’ Nappa leather in the Dual Motor is stunning and probably what I would opt for. Which is rare given I am no leather fan. But whatever the material, there’s a decent amount of support on offer. 

If you opt for the Nappa upgrade ($7000) you get Harman Kardon speakers embedded in the front headrests. It’s an interesting addition but it sounds quite cool when you realise where the sound is coming from.

Aside from the ‘play’ dial on the console, there are very few visible buttons. Meaning every function is housed in the central 15.4-inch landscape digital display.

I recently spent some time in another new Geely Group product - the Volvo EX30 - which has a similar set-up.

Thankfully, the menu is easy to navigate and the main screen is split between nav (running Google Maps of course) and up to four other functions, including apps like Spotify, a quick link to often-used controls and whatever else you want to customise.

Aside from the visually appealing graphics and colours, the display is crisp and easy to get your head around. The air con is easy to access and you use the screen to change the direction of the vents, which oscillate on the passenger side. 

The ambient lighting which is solar system themed is pretty cool, too. You pick the colour by planet. And the ‘Hey Google’ command appears to work well.

However, functions like opening the glove box should still be a physical button. There is no reason it needs to be housed in the screen. Also, adjusting the exterior mirrors and steering wheel required a lesson from the Polestar team. You can do it via the screen, or by using the smart controls on the steering wheel that change depending on what function you need. 

Again, this is very clever tech, but is it that necessary? Just because Tesla does something, doesn’t mean every other EV brand on the planet needs to follow suit. 

Then we get to the digital interior rearview mirror. While the lack of a rear windscreen does not impact the look of the car negatively, it’s another element that feels like tech for tech’s sake. Is there really enough of a benefit to interior space to justify this radical change to the car?

The display is clear but when you look at it then the exterior mirrors, the object in the display seems closer than the mirrors. There’s also no washer for the camera, with Polestar suggesting the angle means it doesn’t need one. The question remains, what happens if it malfunctions? 

I realise you can’t see out the back of plenty of vehicles, like trucks and, often, delivery vans. It’s also something you have to navigate when you pack your car full of gear for holiday and can’t see past all the luggage. And I appreciate many more people will be drawn in by the tech of it all. But for me it remains the answer to a question no one asked.

Moving to the rear, the slightly bucketed seats are plush and supportive and there is acres of legroom thanks to the Polestar 4’s 4.8-metre wheelbase. It is a spacious cabin no doubt, but the placement of the battery pack under the floor means your knees sit up higher than they would in an ICE car. It’s a similar phenomenon in Tesla models. There’s also no toe room under the front seats. 

You can, however, recline the rear seats slightly, making for a more relaxed vibe back there. There are amenities like rear digital climate controls, more USB-C ports, chest and knee-level air vents, and a fold-down arm-rest with cupholders, but big bottles won’t fit in the doors.

The boot appears shallow but there is under-floor storage where you can house the charging cable as well as flatter items. All up you get up to 526 litres of cargo space (that includes 31L under-floor), increasing to 1536L with the 60/40 split rear seats folded, while a front cargo space swallows 15L.

Polestar only offers a tyre repair kit for the 4, so no temporary spare. 

As the entry-grade variant in the US range, the LandCruiser 1958 is more utilitarian than pampering. That translates to a cabin that has plenty of usability, just like the Australian-delivered LandCruiser Prados we’re used to.

There’s nothing overtly different about the US-spec model, with good space and small item storage in the front and decent room in the second row.

The multimedia system is the same as the one used here too, which speaks to Toyota’s strength for consistency of product around the world. It means anyone driving a Toyota - whether it’s in Australia, the US or elsewhere - has a sense of familiarity immediately.

It also helps that Toyota has stuck with a large amount of physical buttons and switchgear (I counted nearly 50) in addition to the touchscreen. While other brands look to cut controls to save money at the expense of usability, Toyota is sticking with what people know and enjoy.

However, the US version of the Prado has the same riser box inside the boot, which limits its cargo capacity in the same way as it has done here. It's still a reasonable size, but the riser does eat into space and compromises practicality.

For a bit of context to why the Prado is known as the LandCruiser in the States, Toyota USA skips the Fortuner for the 4Runner and ignores the LandCruiser 300 Series in favour of the Tundra-twinned Sequoia. That leaves the iconic LandCruiser nameplate unused, so it does make sense to ditch the ‘Prado’ name.

In the US it is positioned as a rival to the likes of the Ford Bronco and Jeep Wrangler, aimed at off-road adventure types, rather than the family market.

We drove the LandCruiser 1958, an entry-grade specification that has a ‘retro’ look and feel and features some unique design elements. It’s priced from US$56,700 (approx. $86,300), which is significantly more than the $72,500 Prado GX that starts our local range.

Despite the retro elements the 1958 variant gets a reasonable level of standard equipment, including keyless entry and ignition, heated fabric seats, climate control, a 7.0-inch digital instrument display panel, an 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen, six-speaker sound system and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android auto.

The battery electric Polestar 4 comes with two powertrain options. 

As its name suggests, the Long Range Single Motor has one motor driving the rear wheels only, and it pumps out 200kW of power and 343Nm of torque. That’s enough to help propel the SUV from zero to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds, on the way to a 200km/h top speed. 

The Long Range Dual Motor has a second motor on the front axle for all-wheel-drive grip, and the power and torque is bumped to 400kW and 686Nm, respectively. You’ll get to 100km/h a lot quicker at 3.8 seconds, too.

This is the heart of our review, the unavailable hybrid engine, the so-called 'i-Force Max' hybrid powertrain. This is because the US market has never embraced diesel engines, which are so beloved by Prado owners in Australia, so in the search for greater efficiency, Toyota USA is leaning on hybrid technology.

The set-up in the LandCruiser combines a 2.4-litre four-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine with an electric motor in the bell housing between the engine and eight-speed automatic transmission. The combined output of this petrol-electric hybrid is 243kW of power and 630Nm of torque, which is significantly more than the 150kW/500Nm offered by the 2.8-litre turbo diesel offered in Australia.

The catch is, despite the additional power and torque, the LandCruiser is only rated to tow slightly more than 2700kg compared to the 3500kg towing capacity offered by our diesel Prado.

The Polestar 4 uses a 400-volt, 100kWh lithium-ion battery.

The Long Range Single Motor has a healthy EV driving range of up to 620km on the WLTP standard, and energy consumption ranges from 17.8 to 18.1 kilowatt hours per 100 kilometres.

Range in the Dual Motor drops to a still very useful 590km and efficiency sits between 18.7 and 21.7kWh/100km.

We were in and out of different grades at the launch so didn’t capture real-world efficiency but we will when we do a full review soon.

AC charging is at a rate of 11kW, but if you opt for the $8000 Plus Pack that increases to an impressive 22kW which ensures a zero to 100 per cent home charge (32-amp) in just five and a half hours.

DC charging capacity is up to 200kW and Polestar says you should be able to get from 10 to 80 per cent full in about 30 minutes. 

These add up to solid figures for the price and segment. 

It comes with a type 2 and CCS2 charge port and a home charging cable.

Obviously one of the biggest reasons for offering/choosing a hybrid engine is fuel efficiency and on that front the LandCruiser runs into the classic problem of big car, small engine. The official combined urban/highway fuel economy figure for the hybrid is 10.2L/100km, which is well behind the official claim for the diesel-powered Prado of just 7.6L/100km.

Drilling in deeper, the LandCruiser hybrid can drop as low as 9.4L/100km on the highway but rises to 10.6L/100km in a purely urban environment, which is typically the opposite to how hybrids excel.

The other major difference between the LandCruiser and our Prado is the size of the fuel tank. The US model only gets a 67-litre tank compared to the 110L offered in Australian models. That, naturally, has a major impact on range, with the LandCruiser hybrid only able to go a theoretical 656km on a single tank, compared to nearly 1300km for the Prado diesel.

Some EVs tend to blend into one another when it comes to the drive experience. Thankfully, that’s not the case with the Polestar 4, which is the fastest Polestar model to date.

I drove the Single Motor and Dual Motor with the Performance Pack back to back, and both hold appeal for different reasons. 

The Single Motor is the everyday Polestar 4 and it is the one I would choose. There is ample power and torque on offer and that 7.1-second 0-100km/h sprint time is nothing to be sniffed at.

Riding on the standard 20-inch aero wheels with a high sidewall, the Single Motor is composed with a comfortable ride quality. The drive from Adelaide via various winding and pockmarked roads to the Barossa Valley highlighted how well the Single Motor can handle these sorts of surfaces. It’s not as comfy as a Camry, but Polestar has ironed out most of the firmness.

Steering feels light but super sharp in the Single Motor and while there is a hint of body roll, it is still exceptionally capable on the twisty stuff. It also doesn’t feel anywhere near its 2230kg kerb weight.

The Dual Motor is a different beast, especially when paired with the Performance Pack. That pack adds, among other items, Brembo brake callipers and a ‘Polestar Engineered’ chassis tune.

It is brutally quick from a standing start. Like ‘pull your face back’ quick. Zero to 100km/h in 3.8sec to be precise. It’s a hoot, but it is much more than just a straight-line speed machine. 

The Dual Motor carves up corners, again with slight roll, but it has no business being this sharp given its dimensions and weight. We sprinted (safely) through bends better suited to a tiny performance hatch with ease. 

You can adjust the chassis to your preference. Suspension runs from 'Standard' to 'Nimble' and 'Firm', and steering is either Standard or Firm, the latter adding quite a bit of weight to the steering. Power delivery is either 'Range' or 'Performance'. Obviously, the latter is the most fun. 

Even in Standard suspension mode, the ride is much firmer than the Single Motor, which isn’t helped by the massive 22-inch wheels. It is, however, never unbearable. In fact, it’s more than fine on some of the average roads we encountered. 

The Polestar 4 is well insulated, ensuring a hushed cabin. 

While it may be a hybrid, the LandCruiser is no urban ‘show pony’ and Toyota USA is adamant that it is tough enough to live up to the reputation of its famous nameplate. It’s built on the same TNGA-F platform as our Prado - as well as the Tundra pick-up and others - so it has the foundations for rugged adventure.

It comes standard with locking centre and rear differentials, rear coil springs, full-time four-wheel drive, a two-speed transfer case, ‘CRAWL Control’, a 2400W AC inverter and standard trailer brake controller, which are all must-haves for anyone planning a serious off-road trip.

While we have little reason to doubt the off-road ability of the LandCruiser, our test drive was limited to the urban jungle of Los Angeles, which allowed us to really focus on the powertrain.

Not surprisingly, given its similarities with other Toyota hybrid set-ups, it felt very familiar, albeit in a very different vehicle than the RAV4 and Camry we’ve driven previously. Despite its big on-paper numbers, there was some noticeable lag on initial acceleration and the engine sounds like a modern four-cylinder - a bit gruff when revved hard.

It certainly has enough performance to pull the LandCruiser along, but it isn’t over-endowed with power and torque. At least not in the way its stats suggest.

For the most part, around town, it did a good job of quietly motivating the big SUV around with a minimum of fuss.

Being a US-specific model there is no ANCAP or Euro NCAP crash testing data, but given the diesel model scored a five-star rating there’s little evidence to suggest it would be any less safe.

All US LandCruiser models come standard with the Toyota Safety Sense 3.0 suite of active safety features. This includes pre-collision warning, lane departure warning with steering assist, lane tracing assist, road sign assist and full-speed adaptive cruise control.

Covering the Polestar 4 is a five-year, unlimited kilometre new-vehicle warranty, and an eight year, or 160,000km battery warranty. 

Complimentary roadside assist covers you for five years too.

The service schedule is every two years or 30,000km.

But the big news is that Polestar won’t charge you a cent for servicing for the first five years, or 100,000km of ownership, whichever comes first - it’s complementary.

This is an outstanding aftersales offer.

One big plus for the LandCruiser over the Prado is Toyota USA offers two years of free servicing - a nice bonus.

It does have different warranty coverage for different components though, the overall vehicle warranty covers the first three years, the powertrain is covered for five years but the hybrid components are warranted for 10 years.