BYD Sealion 6 vs Skoda Enyaq

What's the difference?

So, should Toyota, Tesla, Hyundai and others be worried about the arrival of the Sealion 6 and BYD’s new DMi powertrains? Yes, but not because it represents any major breakthrough in technology or dynamic prowess. 

Instead, the strength of the Sealion 6 is how average it is. It may not be the obvious class-leader in any particular area, but it does a good job in almost every measurable aspect and doesn’t possess any major flaws.

Yes, there are still questions about the long-term dependability of BYDs but that’s a risk any new owner will need to accept. But the very sharp pricing should tempt plenty of buyers to take that chance and continue BYD’s steady upwards trajectory in the Australian market.

Skoda’s runaway sales success in Europe makes sense, where there’s a broad range including a pragmatic family-friendly wagon version. In Australia, though, the pre-facelift Enyaq is destined to remain a niche proposition. 

This is absolutely no bad thing. Judging by the number of double takes and gawks the Mamba Green RS got over its tenure, having too many on the roads could be a danger. It gets all the main ingredients right with solid efficiency, good packaging and there-or-thereabouts pricing. 

The Skoda Enyaq is an electric car to consider if you appreciate practical touches and delight in the well-calibrated driving experience Skoda offers. Those who appreciate the out-there styling and bright colours will find the appeal obvious.

This is one area where BYD has a mixed record. Not to be unkind or create an international incident, but the Chinese car industry has a history of not being totally original with all of its automotive designs.

However, things are improving and the Sealion 6 is a good example of the Chinese industry learning to develop its own style. While there are some subtle hints from European models, overall it’s a smart-looking mid-size SUV with some character to it - rather than being a bland imitation of something else.

One area where the Sealion is a cut above its competition is its size, being longer than and wider than the RAV4, Mitsubishi Outlander and Nissan X-Trail.

Being divisive in this day and age is important, especially in this segment. While Tesla design was briefly a symbol of change, the Model 3 and Y have rapidly become anonymous blobs that amble down every main arterial. The Mamba Green Enyaq RS coupe is an antidote.

Sure, it’s a little awkward and tall from behind (channelling a bit of first-gen BMW X6 in its overall form) yet the low roofline, huge 21-inch alloy wheels, crisp swage lines and tall bonnet give the Enyaq’s shape interest. 

The proportions are about right with a long wheelbase (2766mm) compared to the Enyaq's overall 4653mm length giving it a wheel-in-each-corner stance. Height is just 1618mm, not much taller than a sedan, and width is 1879mm. 

Individual details, such as the glowing crystal grille (a bit like a Hollywood actor's teeth) proved divisive, yet when everything else is so strong — including the colour — the Enyaq is strangely resolved. Power plus power works, in this case.

Jumping inside there’s a reassuring calm after that searing paint (other shades are available, but why would you?) Not quite austere, the Enyaq’s cabin majors on black leather and nicely grained plastic.

A flourish of faux carbon fibre and twist of chrome on the door handles combine with customisable ambient lighting to lift cabin ambience. 

The Enyaq isn’t all perfect with some materials, especially below the belt line, feeling cheaper than you'd expect for $83K. Creaks and groans from plastic parts in the centre console and dashboard could be heard while driving, too.

That external size translates to a roomy cabin, which also has some flair to the design but thankfully a bit more restrained than the smaller Atto 3 - which is a bit over-the-top in this reviewer’s opinion. 

The element that sticks out immediately is the large central touchscreen which, like other models in the range, can rotate either vertical or horizontal, depending on your preference.

I don’t understand the point of this, because when rotated vertically it impacts your forward vision and can interfere with the air conditioning vents; and I can’t even see it with my polarised sunglasses.

It simply makes more sense horizontally, but I guess all carmakers are looking for catchy gimmicks these days. But while it may seem like a cool party trick it remains somewhat confusing to me, like one more thing to go wrong. But maybe I’m just getting old and grumpy.

What I do like and think is a great idea is double smartphone charging pads in the centre console. And overall the design of the cabin feels well thought out and has plenty of useful storage areas.

The seats are fine, a little flat and the fixed headrests are irritating, but overall they’re soft and supportive enough.

The key in the second row seating is the amount of space, with the extra length of the Sealion 6 compared to its rivals showing up with more knee room in the back for families with growing teenagers or those who need to carry their adult friends.

There’s also a pair of USB ports in the back too, so everyone can keep their electronics charged.

The boot is a good size, measuring 425 litres on paper, and has a nice long and wide floor. But some of that space is thanks to the lack of a spare - so that counts against it in my book.

There’s a more practical wagon-bodied version offered in Europe, contributing to the Enyaq’s success as a family car but the Enyaq coupe still bursts with smart storage.

In fact, it’s fairer to think of this Enyaq RS as more of a raised sedan, a slightly taller-riding electric version of the Skoda Superb, rather than a 'coupe'. 

The Skoda Enyaq has a huge 570-litre boot that puts it at the pointy end of the class (Tesla’s 854L Model Y claim is fanciful, including underfloor storage and counting all the way to the roof). 

Plus, being a Skoda, the Enyaq ships with 'Simply Clever' touches like four shopping bag hooks, four tie-down points, extensive cargo net system, two amazingly useful Velcro boot dividers and segmented underfloor storage for supplied Mode 2 and 3 charging cables. There’s even a hook on the parcel shelf to hold the false floor up. The only miss is a lack of spare wheel. 

The backrest folds flat in a 60/40 split and this can be done from the back seat with remote levers. There’s also a ski-port pass-through that doubles as an armrest in the back seats.

Accommodation in the rear is great, even for those about six foot. I was comfortable sitting behind my driving position at 188cm, with good knee room, toe space and headroom. 

Amenity includes a separate climate zone, two USB-C chargers, nifty pull-up and clip-in rear sunshades, a removable centre box (so you can have a fully flat floor) and two cupholders in the armrest. Materials are mostly hard, though there is a squishy armrest on the door card. 

The only negative in the back — especially apparent in harsh Australian summers — is the heat radiating from the standard glass roof. There is a manually-installable sunshade available from Skoda. 

The Skoda Enyaq has ISOFIX anchors on both outboard rear seats and the same number of top tether anchors. The top tethers are easy to access with no covers to get in the way. 

It has doors that open quite wide, but not quite to 90 degrees, and the low roof means door apertures are a little awkward. Also, because the door cladding comes all the way down and the car is functionally quite low, care is required around tall kerbs.

You’ll notice in the front door card that Skoda’s signature umbrellas are nestled into the hole the armrest leaves, which is a great touch. 

The bucket seats are 10-way power adjustable with two-position memory and heating. It is easy to get comfortable with the reach and height adjustable steering wheel falling perfectly to the hands, being especially accommodating for taller drivers. 

Practical touches include felt-lined door bins, a storage cubby beneath the centre console and shift-by-wire gear selector, half-width glove box, multi-tiered storage below an adjustable centre armrest, adjustable size cupholders and plenty of odds and ends storage.

Technology is straightforward and runs through a responsive 13.0-inch touchscreen. Skoda’s software is fine but most will end up using the consistent wireless Apple CarPlay or Android Auto in the Enyaq. 

Thankfully, doing so doesn’t hamper the screen’s shortcut buttons. At the bottom there’s still quick temperature adjustment and heated seat controls, shortcuts to the home screen, further climate, phone, media menus and more. 

Skoda has kept a few clips of physical buttons, too, some below the screen shortcut to the drive assist, drive modes, park assist, hazard lights, climate control and demisters, while headlights are down and to the right of the steering wheel. Simple stuff, but not to be taken for granted anymore.

The Enyaq range is lean in Australia with two trims, and we’ve got the flagship RS model that costs $83,990, before on-road costs. 

The equipment list is healthy with leather upholstery, 10-way power adjustable heated sets with two-position memory, a heated steering wheel, customisable ambient lighting, tri-zone climate control, a head-up display, wireless smartphone charging, LED lighting and a Canton premium sound system.

Australia only gets the big-batteried Enyaqs, meaning a 77kWh lithium-ion pack. Twin motors are standard on the RS. 

The asking price still stacks up well against rivals from established brands with similar punch, such as Hyundai Ioniq 5 Dynamiq N Line ($87,800), Kia EV6 GT-Line AWD ($87,590), Ford Mustang Mach-E Premium ($79,990) and the dull Toyobaru twins, the Subaru Solterra AWD Touring ($76,990) and Toyota bZ4X AWD ($74,900, all before on-road costs). 

Tesla is the problem — as it always seems to be for established manufacturers — with the newly-upgraded Model Y Long Range nearly $10,000 cheaper ($73,400) and delivering better straight-line performance and driving range. 

While BYD has made its name in Australia as an all-electric brand it has always referred to itself as a 'new energy' company, and the Sealion 6 (and upcoming Shark ute) are why.

That’s because these feature BYD’s new 'Dual-Mode Intelligence' (DMi) powetrain - a hybrid system to you and me.

As mentioned above, the biggest difference between the Dynamic and Premium models is the powertrain, with two reasonably different systems.

The Dynamic is powered by a 78kW/135Nm 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine, paired with a 145kW/300Nm electric motor - making for a combined system output of 160kW/300Nm. Notably, this powertrain only drives the front wheels.

In contrast, the Premium has an all-wheel drive set-up, combining a turbocharged version of the petrol engine (good for 96kW/220Nm) with a pair of electric motors, one on the front axle and one on the rear to produce a combined output of 238kW and 550Nm.

Both models get the same 18.3kWh ‘Blade’ battery, which is BYD’s proprietary technology underpinning all of its models and is attracting attention from other brands.

For reference, the Outlander PHEV has a 20kWh battery, Nissan’s X-Trail e-Power has a 2.1kWh battery, while the more conventional RAV4 Hybrid has just a 6.5Ah battery.

You won’t find any ‘frunk’ in the Skoda, which is a bit of a shame. Instead, the Volkswagen Group 'MEB' platform supports the Enyaq RS’s twin electric motor set-up, with a 210kW and 545Nm item on the rear axle and 134Nm on the front that only activates when needed. 

The result is a combined 250kW and 545Nm. Acceleration is brisk, amped by a sharp throttle calibration. Skoda claims a 0-100km/h time of 5.4 seconds and it continues to be punchy beyond there. The Enyaq’s top speed is electronically limited to 180km/h.

That would have been considered plenty five years ago, yet rivals like the Tesla Model Y Performance mean the Enyaq’s punch is far from mind-blowing by today’s standards. Ultimately, the 210kW rear-drive Enyaq Sportline is all most will need.

There are multiple modes to drive it in, including electric only, with the Dynamic able to go up to 92km on a single charge, while the Premium manages a claimed 81km.

However, it's important to note these are the NEDC standards and not the more real-world like WLTP,  so you may not achieve those in practice.

The claimed fuel consumption is an impressive 1.1L/100km for the Dynamic and 1.4L/100km for the Premium although again achieving those in the real world will take some effort.

With a 60-litre fuel tank BYD claims the Dynamic has a driving range of just over 1000km, while the Premium can manage around 960km.

It's also worth noting the Sealion 6 comes equipped with vehicle-to-load charging which means you can draw power from the batteries to run small electronic devices if you need to.

It’s a bonus feature that may or may not be of use, but is one of those things that may come in handy one day to get you through a camping trip or a BBQ at the park.

In more potent RS guise, the Enyaq’s range suffers a little, at 530km (WLTP) with vehicle energy consumption listed at 14.5kWh/100km. 

That is a reasonable range and it wasn’t too hard to achieve similar figures. Even running the air conditioning on a 30-plus degree summer's day the trip computer recorded a best figure of 15.1kWh/100km over a 250km mix of urban and rural driving, for a real-world driving range of 510km. 

Over 1800km of total driving, the cumulative total was 16.4kWh/100km, giving an average of 470km from a charge.

The Skoda Enyaq’s fast charge speed is mid-pack, capped to 175kW DC. With a powerful enough pylon, you’ll be able to jump from 10-80 per cent charge in less than 30 minutes, says Skoda. We observed close to peak speed during our test. 

Home and slow-speed public charging maxes out at 11kW AC, which should take the Enyaq from flat to full in around eight hours. 

Skoda has a smartphone app that can connect to the Enyaq and give real-time information about charge status in Europe, but it is not yet online in Australia.

Instead, you can set a charge limit and monitor the vehicle’s progress on the centre screen. It is also possible to pre-program climate control functions for specific times to either warm or cool the Enyaq's cabin.

We drove the Sealion 6 Dynamic and despite having the less powerful powertrain it feels good on the road. The DMi system offers good performance, with quiet acceleration off the mark and a good integration between the petrol engine and electric motors. We haven’t driven the Premium yet, so we can’t make any comment on how different it feels.

It’s hard to make a definitive call on the Sealion PHEV powertrain because, like every plug-in hybrid, its greatest strength relies on how the owner operates it.

If you don’t charge the battery every day or so, you’ll just end up lugging around a battery and electric motor for little benefit. However, if you do keep the battery topped up, you can do most of your urban commuting without needing to turn the petrol engine on, which should result in some very low fuel consumption figures.

The company clearly knows this, which is why BYD Australia is offering a complimentary home charger to the first 3000 customers who order a Sealion 6.

Not only will that encourage sales but it will also help owners become evangelists for PHEVs in the future, because they’ll have the best possible experience.

So, a large part of its strength or weakness rests on the owner’s behaviour and that’s something we can’t assess.

As for the rest of the driving experience, the ride comfort is fine. It can’t match the class-leaders for compliance or dynamics, but the Sealion feels pleasant to drive around the urban environment and on the freeway at speed.

Biggest criticism is the steering is very, very light. While that makes parking easier, it feels so light you get very little feedback from the front wheels so it can feel vague at times.

Overall the driving experience is best described as fine. It doesn’t have any major vices but neither does it set any new benchmarks. 

Initial touch points are pure Skoda: sharp, direct steering, a supple yet supportive ride and balanced control weighting. 

You will feel totally at home getting into an Enyaq out of an Octavia, Superb or Kodiaq and this is deliberate. There is no recalibrating to ultra sharp steering, one-pedal driving or strange adaptive driver aids you notice getting into a Tesla or other electric car. 

The Enyaq RS can be a little abrupt over bumps at low speeds, owing to its large 21-inch alloy wheels. There is some knocking from the front suspension as well. It is best to set the drive mode to 'Comfort' around town, softening the adaptive dampers and accelerator response.

When you go out into the countryside, the Enyaq delivers with fantastic body control in its middle Normal drive mode while bump absorption remains excellent. 

Skoda has done a great job insulating the car, the Enyaq is seriously quiet on coarse chip surfaces and slices through the wind at motorway speeds. It is effortless to travel long distances behind the wheel.

When you ask a little more of the chassis on give-and-take roads, though, the Enyaq RS doesn't quite step up to the plate. 

Putting the 15-stage adaptive dampers in 'Sport' mode makes them too firm, without natural body roll. This puts a lot of load through the tyres, which are Bridgestone Turanza Eco items — great for sound and range, not for grip. 

The rubber is staggered, too, with narrower front (235/45 R21) compared to rear (255/40R21) promoting understeer at the limit. A high kerb weight of 2290kg doesn’t help, either, but seems to be a common theme with vehicles based on the VW Group MEB platform. 

It took a bit of getting used to the Enyaq’s brake pedal, too, which is clumsy at blending the regenerative braking at the top of the travel with hydraulic further down. A firmer, more consistent pedal would make for smoother driving.

That said, having paddle-operated four-stage regenerative braking is welcome and, overall, there’s a charm to the way the Enyaq drives. It feels slick and well-oiled in a way many other electric cars feel overly heavy on technology.

The Skoda Enyaq was awarded a maximum five stars in its 2021 ANCAP safety test. It has eight airbags including front, front and rear side, and curtain airbags.

The Enyaq is equipped with active safety features including auto emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian, cyclist and junction detection.

Being a little older than some rivals, the Enyaq does not have the latest driver-attention monitoring systems, but this can be seen as a blessing as they are often poorly integrated. The fuzzy 360-degree camera could do with improvement, too. 

Still, it features blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise control and lane-keep assist. The aids are well calibrated for Australian driving and can be left engaged.

To disable the lane-keep, though, it’s an easy tap on the persistent top menu of the multimedia screen, even with Apple CarPlay running. More of this, please.

BYD is a small company but has partnered with mycar service centres to make maintaining your Sealion 6 easier. The Sealion is covered by BYD's six-year/150,000km warranty as well as its 10-year capped price servicing plan.

Service intervals are every 12 months/20,000km and prices range from $265 up to $1184 for the major eight year/160,000km tune up. Over the first five years, in keeping with most of its rivals, you’ll be paying $1648.

As I’ve written in previous BYD reviews, the biggest question mark hanging over the brand is arguably its long-term prospects. Quite simply, the brand is still too new to know how well it will perform on the used car market.

We also can’t tell you how it will hold up from a reliability point-of-view. We’re not suggesting there’s any doubt over its quality, but each car brand must prove itself reliable and dependable over time, and BYD hasn’t had that time yet.

Skoda’s seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty applies to the Enyaq as it does to all of its models. 

The guarantee is right up there with the best and is a long way ahead of Tesla’s short three-year warranty. 

Servicing is due once every two years or 30,000km and owners can pre-purchase eight- or 10-year service packs, the former costing $1650.