Ford Mustang Mach E vs Volvo C40

What's the difference?

The Mustang Mach-E is fantastic to drive and very competitive on the range and equipment front, allowing it to outpace some of its well established rivals in Australia.

In fact, it's almost a shame about the Mustang name, because it will distract from what is, at its core, a compelling first step for Ford into the fully electric space.

So, don’t expect a ‘Mustang’, at least not in the traditional sense. But this is certainly something. A new future for a new Ford.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The C40 becomes a compelling option in the electrified small SUV space, offering a premium look and feel, great range and tech inclusions at the price, as well as awesome on-road dynamics.

Its main downsides are the rear seat, which is compromised by its platform and design-led roofline, and the overwhelming power and added traction of the dual-motor makes the single motor less attractive on the value front.

Still, regardless of variant chosen, the C40 looks to offer a stand-out balance of price, range, and performance, against its traditional rivals and newcomers alike.

The Mach-E looks good, but nothing like the designs you have come to expect from Ford.

Sure, there are plenty of notes, references and hints, to its Mustang namesake, some more hidden than others, but fans will have to accept this is a new interpretation of the badge for a new era, and at the end of the day, it’s an electric mid-size SUV.

The overall visage is a little more sleek than your average RAV4, though, with a long wheelbase, coupe-like rear, and a curvy shape which no doubt helps it cut through the air as efficiently as its shape will allow.

Mustang hints are found, obviously, in the big pony badge on the front, but also the frowny-face headlight profile, and iconic three-bar pattern for the rear lights, too.

There are even hidden things, like pony imprints on the underbody protection, and ‘electric ponies live here’ branded onto the motor unit, where few buyers will likely ever see it. In a move which should keep all Mach-E owners happy, every grade looks great, each having its own character.

The base car looks all aero with its wheel covers and more humble plastic cladding pieces, while the Select adds contrast piano black bits and more traditional alloy wheels.

The GT goes harder still with a 3D-effect grille and much more Mustang-like 20-inch wheels.

I’m not sure what I was expecting when it came to the Mach-E’s interior, but it looks a bit more ordinary in pictures than it does when you’re in the car.

What appears from a distance to be a hodgepodge of bits from Ford America and Ford Europe with the same dull grayscale theme is more nuanced and textured once you’re in the driver’s seat.

I especially like the tiered dash with the speaker-bar look for the Bang & Olufsen system which integrates across the front, and the 15.5-inch screen which looks like it will dominate the space is actually at a perfect distance from the driver.

An appreciated amount of soft-touch surfaces and synthetic leather finishes round out the space. There is even a grade-specific textured detail piece running across the dash. Nice touch.

It’s also a lot to take in, but somehow it works. One thing is for sure though, it’s not traditional ‘Mustang’. This has jumped from the big, brash, old-world (and often maligned for quality issues) interior, to something cleaner, more open and futuristic.

Volvo has become a brand with a distinctive and consistent design language which embodies the kind of beautiful minimalism normally associated with Scandinavian brands.

I have always liked how Volvo says more with less design elements, with only gentle touches of chrome or gloss black, and a lack of over-the-top sporty pieces avoiding the temptation to over-sell the sporty potential of the brand’s range.

The C40 takes the small SUV formula, well established by its XC40 relation, and gets a bit weird and experimental. It’s slightly lower and has a more coupe-styled rear, with a strongly raked rear window giving it a sportier and more aggressive look than the rest of Volvo’s SUV range.

The styling is sold by an angular spoiler piece running atop the boot, and the rear light clusters have gone all minimalist, constructed of individual pieces rather than a single transparent housing, and they give a nod to the C30 hatchback which this car is the spiritual successor to, by name and nature.

The interior offers up no surprises, sticking to the formula Volvo has established across all of its current models. An effortlessly premium space with, again, a minimalistic dash dominated by the portrait touchscreen, the C40’s premium nature is confirmed by its finely patterned inlays, simple chrome pieces, and abundance of soft-touch surfaces.

The big upright vent fittings with clever rhomboid patterns on their adjustment dials are always a highlight piece of modern Volvos, and the pattern work is continued on the central volume adjust dial and even on the little rotating pieces of the light and wiper stalks. Clever.

Even the software is paired back on the multimedia suite and digital dashboard, with easy to use shortcuts and simple menus which suit the car.

Volvo might turn off some buyers with the more unconventional shape of the C40. But for those looking for a more traditional SUV it also offers the XC40 in the same two variants, and the Polestar 2 caters to those not looking for an SUV at all.

This is especially true when it comes to the usability of the cabin. I was surprised to be greeted by a high seating position, a wide cabin, and an abundance of storage with plenty of neat features.

For a start, the centre console is a nice piece of design. It features a floating bridge section with a wireless charging bay, rubberised storage tray, dual bottle holders with variable edges, and a floating armrest piece with a large console box below.

In front, and below the wireless chargers, there’s a big cutaway for additional storage, and a decent sized glove box on the passenger side.

The all-dominating touchscreen, as mentioned, is at a nice distance from the driver, isn’t as obstructive as it looks and unlike the Tesla Model Y or Model 3, the Mach-E scores a little digital instrument panel to provide the driver with conveniently-located core information.

I only have two gripes about these systems. Unfortunately, you have to adjust the climate functions through the touchscreen.

There’s a nice central volume dial, but it would be nice to have physical adjustment dials for temperature and fan speed, too.

As it is, the touch areas are quite small, and require a bit of concentration to jab at.

The instrument panel has a nice clean design, but isn’t customisable, the limited information it shows is all you get. Better than not having one, I suppose.

The rear seat is also excellent, offering me, at 182cm tall, plenty of airspace for my knees, and sufficient width for my arms. Headroom is its most limited dimension, although I fit without my head touching the roof.

The seats are brilliant, clad in a decent synthetic leather material and padded with an excellent amount of foam material for a comfortable ride no matter where you’re seated. The centre seat even seems usable for adults, thanks to the Mach-E’s flat floor.

Rear passengers are treated to bottle holders in the doors, two more in the centre drop-down armrest, USB ports on the back of the centre console, pockets on the backs of the front seats, and a pair of adjustable air vents.

Annoyingly, the huge panoramic sunroof doesn’t have a retractable shade, nor is there a flexible shade accessory on the options list.

Sure, it looks great, but it could be a nuisance, baking the interior during hot Australian summers.

For some reason this particular trait is common in more and more EVs with the Tesla Model Y and Polestar 2 sharing the same issue.

Boot space is 402 litres (VDA) which is not particularly large for a mid-size SUV. I would expect 450 litres or more in this category, but the Mach-E is compromised a little by its aggressively-shaped rear.

It also doesn’t get a spare wheel of any kind, making do with a repair kit under the floor.

Ford also throws in a Type 2 to Type 2 public AC charging cable, but if you plan on charging from a wall socket at home you’ll have to delve into the accessories list.

One of my favourite Mach-E features is the 134 litre frunk. I’ve said before I don’t think this particular EV fad is super useful.

It’s often an inconvenience to have to pop the front from the inside, and I’ve found in my long-term loans of EVs I rarely use them, but the Mach-E’s frunk is special because it’s watertight and drainable.

This opens up some neat opportunities, like the ability to throw dirty hiking, diving, or work equipment in there and hosing it out later, or even filling it up with ice and chucking a case of drinks of your choice in there for an old-fashioned American block party. It even has integrated cupholders for this express purpose.

The C40 is essentially a XC40 with a cropped down roofline, and there are some obvious downsides which this new shape brings.

The front seat throws no surprises, though, offering plenty of room for two adults with a welcome level of adjustability for the seat and wheel. The seats could be more comfortable, though, with a notable lack of padding in the base compared to some luxury (or even non-luxury) rivals. 

I’m a fan of the fabric trim which comes on both grades, bucking the trend of needing to have leather or leather-like trim for a car to feel ‘premium’.

The ample window space up front, including the massive glass roof helps the C40’s cabin feel spacious, but the view out the rear with its aggressive design is all but a very limited letterbox aspect, particularly if the rear seat headrests are in the upright position. 

While some controls are exclusively via touch interface, there is a physical volume dial, and shortcut buttons for the defogger functions. 

Temperature is controlled by touch, however, and the detail settings have some smaller toggle adjustments. Tricky to jab at when you’re on the move.

The digital dash is refreshingly simple, but minimally adjustable, with the choice of either a nifty navigation screen, a blank screen, or trip details being the only options.

Cabin storage is good but not stellar. There are bottle holders and big pockets in the doors, a set of two cupholders in the centre (beats the Polestar 2’s single cupholder), a small tray with a wireless charger under the multimedia screen, and a smallish console armrest box.

The rear seat is where the real problem exists. Unlike the XC40, the C40’s cropped roofline means my head was hard up against the roof (I’m 182cm tall). 

I did have decent knee room behind my own seating position, however the seat comfort in the back still isn’t as good as some rivals. 

The middle position is also compromised, thanks to the raised centre floor piece the C40’s platform needs to facilitate all-wheel drive in its combustion relations.

A bottle holder appears in each door pocket, and in a rare inclusion, there are heated outboard rear seats, adjustable air vents, and USB-C charging ports.

The boot has a quoted capacity of 413 litres with the rear seats up. The floor is comparatively high suggesting a smallish space when loaded with luggage cases, for instance. Stay tuned for a follow-up review so we can see how well it holds our three-piece demo set.

The floor itself has an adjustable, pop-up divider and multiple luggage hooks, making it quite versatile, and there is a cavity beneath which can hold your charging cables as well as the inflator kit in place of a spare wheel.

When it comes to electric vehicles, it’s impossible to consider price alone, as you also have to consider driving range, and the C40 manages to impress on both fronts.

Its refreshingly simplified range consists of just two highly-specified variants, a single motor which starts from $74,990, offering a 434km driving range, or a dual motor starting from $82,490 which offers a 420km driving range.

There’s much more devil in the detail, but to set the scene there are now quite a few direct rivals in this price-bracket, including everything from the Tesla Model Y (from $72,300), Mercedes-Benz EQA (from $78,513), Polestar 2 (from $63,900) and even the Kia Niro which is similarly sized and specified (from $65,300).

Interestingly, the C40 is closely related to the Polestar 2, but has a much higher base starting price. Volvo says this is because it carries a higher standard specification, and offers the C40 without option packs.

Standard gear on the base single motor C40 includes 19-inch alloy wheels, a 9.0-inch portrait multimedia touchscreen (running a Google-based always-online software suite), LED headlights, dual-zone climate control, a fixed panoramic sunroof, electrically adjustable front seats, heated seats for the front two and outboard rear seats, a powered tailgate, as well as keyless entry with touch-free ignition.

Interestingly, Volvo also told us some 90 per cent of customer interest so far has been for the more expensive dual-motor variant, which is particularly impressive for doubling the power output while adding 20-inch alloy wheels, a 360-degree parking suite, premium Harmon Kardon audio, and an alternate interior trim.

Both variants score safety equipment and items which are otherwise part of expensive option packs in the Polestar 2 range. We’ll take a look at the full safety gear later in this review.

Overall, the C40 impresses on the premium car value front compared to rivals, bolstered by solid range and impressive performance.

The Mach-E might not look like a traditional Mustang, but don’t be fooled, it’s no ordinary mid-size SUV on the performance front.

Even in its most basic trim level, the Mach-E puts out 198kW/430Nm, and yes, it’s rear-wheel drive.

The mid-grade version boosts power even further to 216kW/430Nm, while the top-spec GT nearly doubles outputs to 358kW/860Nm thanks to its dual-motor, all-wheel drive system.

Sprint times are a hot-hatch baiting 6.6 seconds for the base Select, 6.2 seconds for the Premium and an impressive 3.7 seconds for the GT.

The GT scores other enhancements, too, like the 'MagneRide' suspension also seen in the internal-combustion Mustang, and upgraded software unlocking the sportiest ‘Untame Plus’ drive mode which Ford says is ‘for track use only’ (and it is, because it basically turns traction control down to a minimum). 

Great news here, the C40 can be chosen with two powerful layouts, either a front-wheel drive 170kW/330Nm set-up, or a dual-motor all-wheel drive arrangement, able to make use of nearly double the power at 300kW/660Nm. The dual-motor is capable of sprinting from 0-100km/h in just 4.7 seconds.

The front-drive is backed by a 69kWh battery allowing it a 434km range, while the dual motor ups the battery size to 78kWh to allow a 420km driving range.

As mentioned, the three Mach-E variants have distinctly different range offerings. The base Select travels a respectable 470km between charges, the mid-grade Premium covers 600km (one of the longest ranges on offer from any EV currently in the Australian market) and the top-spec GT travels 490km between charges.

Interestingly, the base car is offered with the more affordable LFP (lithium-iron phosphate) battery chemistry for its 71kWh unit which uses less rare materials, sourced from China’s CATL, while the larger 91kWh batteries are sourced from Korea’s LG Chem using the higher output but more expensive NMC (nickel-manganese cobalt) chemistry.

On the efficiency front the Mach-E isn’t bad considering its performance, and size. The base Select is rated at 17.8kWh/100km on the combined cycle, while the number is lower for the Premium at 17.3kWh/100km, but hops up to a less-than-impressive 21.2kWh/100km for the all-wheel drive GT.

For reference, these official consumption figures are about on-par with the Ioniq 5 and a little lower than the EV6. It will be interesting to test this car’s range and efficiency figures at a later date, on a longer test.

Surprisingly, energy consumption is quite high for both C40 variants. The single motor is the more efficient of the two, consuming 16.8kWh/100km on the more lenient ADR testing schedule, while the dual motor officially consumes 22.2kWh/100km to the same standard. I saw around 23kWh/100km overall in my short test of the dual-motor variant.

Energy consumption could be better for both, as I have achieved more consistently impressive results particularly from Hyundai and Kia electric cars.

Where the C40 is more impressive though is its charging specs, which are exactly where they need to be for a car this size. On a rapid DC charger, the C40 can charge at a rate of 150kW meaning a 10 - 80 percent charge in 40 minutes for the dual motor, or 32 minutes for the single motor.

On the slower AC standard, the C40 charges at a rate of 11kW. Expect a 10 - 80 percent charge time of around five or six hours on this standard. 

The C40 uses a European-standard Type 2 CCS charging port, although it misses out on the handy two-way charging feature offered by some rivals.

Let’s make one thing clear. The Mach-E does not drive like a Mustang. A Mustang, of course, being characterized primarily by its brash V8 roar, gratuitous cabin and grand touring dynamics.

No, the Mach-E immediately reminds me of a Ford Europe SUV. Sounds like an insult doesn’t it? But it isn’t.

The Escape and Puma are remarkably sharp to drive, and I consider them deeply underrated options in the SUV space, and more suited to drivers than they first appear. 

The Mach-E takes the best elements of these two and dials it up to 11, adding the smoothness of an electric powertrain and inherent rear-wheel drive performance characteristics as it does.

While it saddles you with a tall SUV-like seating position, it’s no simple SUV once you get it on a few curves, the urgent performance from the rear-mounted motor, even in the base car, is excellent, feeling as though it punches above many of its rivals, while the sharp, accurate steering makes it feel surprisingly agile and responsive considering its dimensions and weight.

The regenerative braking is well-calibrated, too, offered in either a one-pedal or more moderate tune, but perhaps the most surprising aspect of this car is its well balanced ride.

Reviews from my colleagues overseas pointed to an overly hard ride, which I was expecting, but I was greeted with a car that deals with bumps, undulations, and corrugations with a remarkable amount of poise.

Ford says what it calls the “Irish tune” was selected as it offered the best ride for our roads, and it seems the Blue Oval engineers weren’t wrong.

It’s a firmer ride than the boaty Hyundai Ioniq 5, but not as firmly sprung as the Polestar 2 or Tesla Model Y.

In other words, it’s firm enough to make it fun to drive, but not hard enough to ruin it in your day-to-day commute.

It was also interesting to find the MangeRide adaptive suspension in the GT grade didn’t make as big a difference as expected, firming things up a little on some surfaces, but offering a slight edge to the amount of chassis control on offer as a result.

The three drive modes also make a significant difference to the experience. The ‘Whisper’ mode dials back accelerator response and artificial noise, serving as a kind of ‘eco’ setting which is said to also be more suited to low-traction scenarios, where the instant torque of the electric motors can easily spin the wheels.

The standard mode is far more balanced, while the 'Untame' mode makes the motors respond in haste, and dials up the artificial rumbling noise, but not to an unpleasant level.

The fourth, ‘Untame Plus’ mode, only available on the top-spec GT, allows the car to, for example, break into a drift when grip is low enough by dialling back the traction control.

It’s designed to allow a little more play and maximise acceleration response for track use. Still, it doesn’t feel as tail-happy as its namesake combustion coupe.

While it appears to be yet another mid-size electric EV, then, there’s something a little more on offer here, and something which sets itself apart from the electric pack by being fun to drive in a way something like a Tesla Model Y isn’t.

The best part is, these unusually engaging dynamics extend beyond the top-spec GT, all the way to the base Select.

The only thing is, it’s still very tidy. It’s organised, the traction control is clever, the chassis is sharp, the steering is brilliant and the electric motors are… inorganic.

In some ways, this car is too good to be a Mustang, certainly missing some of the edge-of-your seat chaos a V8 rear-driven coupe can bring.

So, long as you understand this, there’s a very compelling sporty electric SUV to be found here.

If you’ve driven any kind of XC40 or even a Polestar 2 before, the C40 will offer no surprises. It’s pretty much exactly the same from behind the wheel with a few subtle tweaks.

This is a very good thing. The C40 is quiet, easy to drive, and its electric motor and regen system offer a smooth single-pedal experience.

It is also alarmingly, overwhelmingly, rapid. While its massive set of batteries under the floor make it feel heavy off the line in stop-start traffic, sticking your boot into the accelerator will remove any doubt, particularly in the dual-motor variant, that this Volvo means business.

The dual-motor also has an incredible torque-vectoring system, making it extremely difficult to elicit so much as a squeak from its tyres. It also feels as though torque is distributed quite evenly between its two driven axles, making it feel neither prone to over- or understeer.

This has the effect of making the C40 feel somewhat indestructible in the corners, with absurd levels of grip. 

The same feeling is present in top-spec versions of the Polestar 2, only the feeling of ever-present weight is more noticeable in the higher-riding C40, which can make it unsettling to take corners at the kinds of speeds it is capable of.

The steering tune is interesting. Volvo offers two software-controlled modes, either heavy or standard, and the standard mode is heavy enough. 

Despite its electrical assistance, the wheel does continue to offer some organic feedback, making the C40 a pleasure to steer on countryside roads.

The ride is also surprisingly good, despite massive wheel options. I was impressed how easily the C40 handled most bumps and undulations, communicating little to the cabin. 

The ride can approach its limits with such big wheels and the weight of its batteries, generally these are communicated via unsettling thuds from underneath the car. Regular undulations at higher speeds also had the C40 bouncing around a little.

On the whole, though, the cabin is kept relatively insulated and serene, adding an element of total confidence, similar to that offered by Teslas, whilst offering better ride quality with a softer edge. At higher speed, at least on the 20-inch wheels, road noise does pick up, however.

In terms of electric driving, there is a single adjustable setting for regen. The car either offers a full single pedal mode with maximum regenerative braking to bring the car to a halt with the motor alone, or a ‘standard’ mode which tones the regen down and offers it blended in via the brake pedal. 

Single pedal mode is more efficient. I suggest you stick to it if you want to make the most of this car’s efficiency.

I was surprised to have so few complaints about the C40’s drive experience. This is a balanced and capable EV which is yet another example of how even vehicles which use combustion platforms are improved out of sight by full electrification.

Sticking to its brand promise, Volvo offers the full range of active safety equipment on the C40 regardless of variant.

This includes freeway-speed auto emergency braking, rear auto braking, lane keep assist with lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, and one of the best adaptive cruise control systems on the market.

The only item the single motor misses out on is a 360-degree parking camera, which is exclusive to the dual motor variant.

It is notable how the adaptive cruise control, blind spot monitoring rear cross-traffic alert, and rear auto braking are on the options list for the Polestar 2.

These active systems combined with eight airbags (the standard dual front, side, and curtain, as well as a driver’s knee and centre airbag) make for a five-star ANCAP safety rating to the latest 2022 standards.

Ford offers a now industry standard five-year, unlimited kilometre warranty, as well as the battery manufacturer standard eight-years and 160,000km for the high-voltage components.

Unlike some EVs in this space which push intervals out to two years, the Mach-E needs to see a workshop once every year or 15,000km, whichever occurs first.

Thankfully, servicing is relatively affordable, at just $135 or $180 at alternating years for the first 10 years, and roadside assist is automatically topped up with each service (at an authorised Ford dealer) up to seven years.

The C40 is covered by Volvo’s five year and unlimited kilometre warranty, with a separate eight-year, 160,000km warranty for the battery. There is also eight years of roadside assistance attached.

It is pleasing to see the service intervals for the C40 are long, as they should be for an electric car with so few moving parts, set at two years or 30,000km. 

The first 24 month service is free of charge, and Volvo tells us service pricing after this period will average out to around $100 a year ($200 per visit).