2022 Kia Picanto vs 2024 Nissan Juke

What's the difference?

The Picanto GT is the least expensive sporty runabout for the money, providing a dash of visual flair and plenty of gear to go with its punchy performance.

If you’re a warm or hot hatch buyer, however, you might find that the Kia lacks the vital handling focus and dynamic polish of the better (albeit costlier) alternatives, even if there’s enough muscle on tap to raise a few pulses.

No, it’s best to enjoy the GT for what it represents in 2022 – a more eager and entertaining option for budget buyers who seek a city runabout with a bit more speed and spice.

And, don't forget: as only Kia currently occupies this space, even the most expensive Picanto represents great value that never feels cheap.

The Juke is a fun little car. It looks cool, it packs most of the important features and safety equipment, but while it can be fun to drive, it’s also a little clunky around town.

It’s so frustrating, because there is a great car in there somewhere, and it would take only small tweaks and enhancements to bring it out.

Fun fact: the Picanto is known as the Morning in some countries.

Commanding some 70 per cent of all sales, its only competition nowadays in Australia is the ancient Fiat 500 and soon-to-vanish Mitsubishi Mirage. Former rivals like the Holden Spark, Nissan Micra and Suzuki Celerio are history, though the tall and skinny Suzuki Ignis should be included too even though it is classed as an SUV.

Speaking of height, let’s talk size.

At just under 3.6 metres long, 1.6m wide and 1.5m high, the pert Picanto is classed internationally as a ‘sub-B’ city car (known inaccurately as well as rather disparagingly as the Micro segment in Australia), that sits below regular superminis/light cars like the Mazda2 and Toyota Yaris.

A clean and elegant design that has aged well since launching in 2017, the JA-series Picanto is the third-generation version since the nameplate was debuted internationally in 2004, and helped establish Kia as a globally relevant player in mature markets like Europe.

Mid-2020 saw a minor facelift with a revised front-end styling, equipment and technical improvements inside and some small mechanical upgrades.

Urban style is clearly what the Juke is about. It’s always been about this, but the original incarnation, while unusual, was a bit bulbous and awkward. The current version is a razor-sharp re-interpretation of the original.

Ugly duckling no more, the Juke blends the elements of Nissan’s current design language with its own unique take, in a clever way.

The roofline and bulbous face of the original car, complete with its ‘eye’ headlights are all maintained, but this time they look more contemporary with a splash of chrome and gunmetal plastic in the face, offset by gloss blacks running down the doorline.

The new light fittings look great and the curviness is also gently off-set with some sharp angles. The massive 19-inch wheels finished in a two-tone gloss black and aluminium brush keep this car looking like a concept come to life. Just don’t crash them into the curb. It would be very easy to.

The cool elements continue inside, with rotary air vents, a blend of textures, including a gloss grey for the vent claddings, with white stitching for the wheel, seat, and into the door cards, too.

There are touches of chrome about the place, and an ambient red LED light surrounding the shifter, which sits on its own little pedestal thing.

It’s quirky and punches above its weight when it comes to soft trims in the doors. Like most higher-grade Nissans the seats are pretty comfy, too, clad in a hard-wearing synthetic leather material.

But it won’t be for everyone, and it’s not without its downsides. The abundance of grey plastic down the centre console is a bit cheap, and the tech offering doesn’t match the youthful style.

The centre screen is adequate, but compared to many rivals it’s a bit small and dull, and the Juke is still missing a digital overhaul for its instrument cluster.

The black headlining, usually reserved for sportier cars, makes the cabin feel smaller than it is.

Not as squishy as the diminutive proportions may suggest.

As sub-B superminis vanish from our roads, the Picanto seems smaller and narrower compared to what else is out there. Looking like a Hyundai i30 interior that’s been Xeroxed down to by 70 per cent, the five-seater cabin is tall but slim, with your passenger sitting closer to you than in similarly priced cars like the MG3 or Suzuki Swift.

But it doesn’t feel cramped or tight thanks to deep windows and a pair of well-shaped and largely comfortable front bucket seats. The GT’s set have a sporty look to them, with the driver’s side offering the usual height-adjustment facility to match the ample sliding and reclining functionality.

An unusual item are the front headrest’s fore-aft movement that’s designed to minimise whiplash injury in the event of a collision.

Then there’s the commanding driving position. The dashboard looks big-Kia mature, with full instrumentation (including the always-welcome auxiliary digital speedo since the 2020 facelift), volumous air vents and tonnes of storage, even down to a lidded deep recess underneath the front centre armrest. Accessing the switchgear is also no sweat, and all have a quality look and feel to them.

Smart and contemporary, the 8.0-inch touchscreen offers a wide range of multimedia functionality, backed up by a 12V outlet, USB-A port, remote steering wheel controls, power windows all round (one-touch for the driver) and wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto connectivity.

However, not everything is plain sailing inside.

The steering column does not adjust for reach, there’s no digital radio and the vinyl seats are fine in winter but can feel clammy and hot in warm weather. Beware of that if you’re not wearing sufficient clothing. And – given these are so-called premium ‘sports’ seats, why can’t we have lumbar adjustment for the driver?

Access to the rear seat is a bit of a squeeze due to the restrictive 2400mm wheelbase length and narrow doors this entails, but once sat there, a 180cm person can easily position behind similarly-sized people up front. Squeezing in three adults isn’t easy, especially for the hapless middle passenger, but two riders only should find ample room and comfort, due in most part to the sufficiently sculptured backrest and cushion. The latter is set up quite high, allowing for easier vision out, especially for shorter folk.

There is no need for face-level air vents back there as the front ones reach rear riders, and overhead grab handles, door grab storage, a single map pocket and windows that disappear all the way down are further nice touches, but there is no rear-seat overhead lighting. 

Note that while the Picanto is tolerably quiet from road and wind noise intrusion at urban speeds, at freeway ones it can get quite loud in there.

Further back, the hatch opens up to reveal a pretty limited 255-litre cargo capacity, that’s extended to 1010L with the 50/50 split/fold backrests dropped down. The boot floor is deep but there isn’t that much length to take bulkier items. As mentioned earlier, a space-saver spare wheel is included; it’s recessed under the boot floor.

A modern and inviting cabin that’s very civilised to boot in most urban settings, the Picanto is both roomier and more comfortable than its bargain-basement price suggests, with the GT’s ritzier trim adding a racier ambience to help justify its extra expense.

The Juke is a small SUV in the true sense of the word, sitting below the Qashqai which is more like a mid-sizer these days in terms of dimensions.

However, it’s quite cleverly packaged on the inside and is more useful than it first appears.

The front seats, for example, offer heaps of headroom and a surprising amount of width, and while the seats are manual, they’re pretty adjustable. I was able to find a great seating position.

There are big pockets in the doors with an integrated bottle holder suitable for even the largest bottles, although the centre console area is a bit less versatile, choosing its funky design over additional storage.

It features two good bottle holders, but a tiny armrest box and a shallow tray with one 12V socket and a USB-A outlet, as well as an auxiliary audio input under the climate controls.

On the topic of climate controls, I love the fact the Juke maintains a dedicated ventilation panel complete with buttons and dials for all the core functions. No touchscreen nonsense here.

The media screen, as mentioned, is a tad small, and falls victim to glare easily.

The stock Nissan software is a massive upgrade on the brand’s previous-generation products, but while it’s functional it’s far from the prettiest or the fastest on the market.

The back seat offers more space than you might assume, but it’s not as well thought-out as the front of the cabin. At 182cm tall I fit behind my own driving position with just enough space for my knees and just enough headroom.

There are decent bottle holders in the doors, and a further two small ones in the drop-down armrest. The backs of the front seats are clad in that synthetic leather material, which is nice, and have soft pockets, too.

The back of the front centre console offers just a single USB-A outlet and a small cubby. There are no adjustable air vents for rear passengers. It also feels a little claustrophobic back there thanks to the black trim on everything and smaller windows.

Boot capacity for the Juke is impressive for an SUV in this class, with 422 litres on offer, which is close to the volume we’d expect from something a size-bracket up, and 1305L with the second row folded down. There is a space-saver spare under the boot floor.

The Juke range kicks off from just $28,390 which gets you into a base ST and reaches to $36,890 for the top-spec Ti.

We’re driving the $34,440 (before on-road costs) ST-L which is the upper mid-grade car.

It scores concept-style 19-inch alloy wheels, synthetic leather interior trim, an 8.0-inch multimedia touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity, a 7.0-inch digital screen between the analog dials, a surround camera system, single-zone climate, keyless entry and push-start ignition, and LED headlights. 

The quite attractive ‘Magnetic Blue’ paint our car wears is a $700 option. For an additional $1133 you can also step up to the ST-L+ grade which adds alternate two-tone seat trim, chrome and black highlights and a 10-speaker Bose audio system.

While this ST-L grade gets the lion’s share of Juke equipment without the price-hike to the Ti (and is therefore the pick of the range) there are some notable items missing at this price.

For example, there’s no wireless phone charging, no head-up display, no fully digital instrument cluster, and no electrical adjustment for the seats. The 8.0-inch multimedia screen is starting to look a bit dated, too.

Still, it looks trendy and those massive wheels are well above the standard for a car at this size or price. So, if you’re going for style over equipment there is a choice to be made here.

Nissan also hasn’t cheaped out on safety equipment, with most active stuff coming standard, even on the base ST. More on this later.

Pricing is about line-ball with its most direct competitors. It’s a tad cheaper than some like the outgoing similarly-styled Toyota C-HR (Koba 2WD - $35,695), or slightly more expensive than others like the current equivalent Ford Puma (ST-Line - $33,190) or Mazda CX-3 (Touring SP - $34,300) although it is also ever so slightly larger than those last two by width, height, and wheelbase.

Under the Picanto’s stubby bonnet is a gem of an engine – a 998cc 1.0-litre double overhead cam three-cylinder direct-injection turbo petrol unit known as the G3LC, developing 74kW of power at 4500rpm and 172Nm of torque from as low as 1500rpm to 4000rpm.

With a tare weight of just 1012kg, it delivers a power-to-weight ratio of 73.1kW per tonne (or 72kW/tonne if measured using its 1026kg kerb weight), for a 0-100km/h sprint time of around 9.4 seconds.

Driving the front wheels is a five-speed manual gearbox. Unlike the visually similar GT-Line powered by the 1.2-litre four-pot petrol engine, no automatic transmission is available. The latter is an old-fashioned four-speed torque-converter auto.

In the Juke’s messy engine bay lies a 1.0-litre, three-cylinder, turbo-petrol engine which sends 84kW/180Nm to the front wheels.

Nissan has its own 'HR10DET' engine code for this unit but it’s actually a Renault 'H5Dt' engine as evidenced by Renault logos all over the place.

Power is communicated by a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic which has been a source of strife for this car since it arrived. This very European engine and transmission combination is one which the Juke shares with its Renault Captur cousin.

I can’t believe I’m actually saying this, but I would prefer a continuously variable transmission (CVT) which Nissan uses elsewhere in its range. It would solve maybe the main issue with this car, which we’ll explore up next in the driving section of this review

Our GT managed 6.6L/100km in hot, testing conditions that saw a fair share of performance testing and higher-speed driving as well as heavy traffic jams, which isn’t too far off the official 5.2L/100km as per Kia’s spec sheet claim. The latter equates to a carbon dioxide emissions rating of 122 grams per kilometre.

The Urban and Extra Urban consumption figures, by the way, are 6.8 and 4.4L/100km respectively.

Tuned to run on 91 RON standard unleaded petrol and compatible with a 94 RON E10 ethanol/petrol mix, the Picanto’s fuel tank is a measly 35 litres, resulting in a potential average distance between refills of 673km.

There is no stop/start technology fitted to help cut emissions and/or save fuel.

One of the reasons this car comes equipped with a dual-clutch automatic is to chase fuel efficiency as well as emissions output. On paper DCT autos don’t suffer the inherent losses of a traditional torque converter transmission.

The official combined cycle fuel consumption figure is 5.8L/100km. My week of driving, weighted slightly more towards freeway conditions, produced a marginally higher average of 6.8L/100km. It’s not the claim, but it’s pretty good.

This little engine requires mid-shelf 95RON unleaded fuel, and the Juke has a 46-litre fuel tank, suggesting a driving range of 793km using the official fuel consumption number.

In a word... spirited.

It’s no shock to learn that the Picanto GT thrives around town.

With a rorty and rev-hungry three-pot turbo that’s champing at the bit to bolt off the line on one hand, and light-yet-agile steering on the other, the smallest Kia is ideal for darting about, zipping in and out of tight traffic spots and squeezing into tiny parking spaces with effortless ease. Its diminutive proportions, fine all-round vision and tight turning circle are excellent assets in the urban jungle.

Usually, a short wheelbase and relatively large wheels make for a choppy, restless ride. But the GT does an adequate job in absorbing most things that the roads throw up. While still quite firm, the suspension isn’t uncomfortable or agitating.

The Kia’s impressive speed and agility also translate well out on the open road, as long as the driver keeps the revs up – no real chore given the agreeable manual shifter and light clutch action. In such conditions, throttle response is immediate and effective, allowing for a surprisingly strong turn of speed for something so small.

Note, though, that there is quite a bit of tyre and road roar intrusion coming into the cabin at higher velocities.

If the revs aren’t in the sweet spot, expect a moment’s delay in engine response, since you’ll have to wait for the turbo to spool up before you feel the power kick in. In wet conditions, sometimes it can come on too suddenly, meaning that the front tyres could break traction, resulting in some scrappy progress.

The Picanto’s steering is fairly direct and composed, for accurate and controlled cornering, especially in dry conditions. But the handling is not as sharp or as involving as some enthusiasts might hope for from a warm hatch, since the GT doesn’t connect in the same, intimate way with a keen driver that, say, a Fiesta ST does so faithfully.

Note that the stability and traction control system can be disabled for drivers wishing to explore the chassis’ dynamic limits, but the lack of a limited slip differential may result in the front wheels bucking if driven carelessly in the rain. At least the brakes are effective and always at the ready to wash away speed quickly once that turbo starts to take effect.

Fun and feisty as the GT is, it's no GTi.

The Juke can be fun to drive, and I wanted to like it more, but the transmission its peppy little engine is paired with is frustrating.

Outputs of 84kW/180Nm doesn’t sound like a lot, but power isn’t the problem. The little engine has a fun turbo-surge which pairs with the Juke's light frame to make for a car which is quite athletic when you push it.

The issue is a mountain of turbo-lag conspires with the clunky dual-clutch automatic to make it far too sluggish off the line.

There’s a full second (or two, at times) to wait for any power to arrive, which simply isn’t good enough at T-junctions and roundabouts, the kind of situations a little urban SUV like this will constantly be encountering.

Nissan says the transmission software was even updated after the Juke’s launch, but it’s still not where it should be.

It has good traits, too. When you’re out on the open road, it has quick, snappy and well-defined shifts, and the engine is much better when it’s being properly pushed, too.

It has a gruff, entertaining tone, and the Juke’s light frame, firm ride, and comparatively heavy steering make it a joy to throw into some corners.

The long wheelbase for such a small SUV, paired with a decent set of tyres, also keeps it confident when its predecessor was a little clumsy.

Again, though, the reasonably hard ride, not helped by the very large wheels, isn't its best trait in an urban environment. The Juke is by no means uncomfortable, it just seems like the priorities for this little SUV aren’t in the right place.

I’ve said this before but there’s a great car in here somewhere. The Juke is fun to drive in the right environment, it’s just this environment is not where most prospective buyers will primarily be looking to use it.

What could fix this issue? A different transmission perhaps. Better yet, an e-Power hybrid powertrain.

The Juke's standard active safety features include freeway-speed auto emergency braking, lane departure warning with lane keep assist, blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise control and traffic sign recognition.

Last time I reviewed this car I complained about the way it vibrates the steering wheel when the lane keep function decides you’re going out of your lane. But having since experienced so many more invasive lane keep systems, this one seems comparatively low-key.

Elsewhere, the Juke gets the standard array of six airbags (dual front, side, and curtain) and wears a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating to the 2019 standards.

Kia has led the industry with a seven-year/unlimited kilometre warranty for a number of years, with only Mitsubishi’s conditional 10-year warranty beating it for now.

Roadside assistance is complimentary the first year, which extends a further seven years as long as you return to an authorised Kia dealer for servicing annually or as required.

Intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, while published basic capped-price servicing ranges from $283 to $606 depending on the interval. The total is $3127 over seven years, averaging $447 annually over that period at the time of publishing.

Nissan offers the Juke with a five-year, unlimited km warranty, with five-years of roadside assist included.

It requires servicing every 12 months or 20,000km and the cost is subject to a capped price servicing program for the first six years.

This averages $651.33 annually, which is not cheap for a small SUV in this class.

However, there is also the option of a pre-paid five-year service plan which brings the annual cost over five years down to a more reasonable $429.60.

But, notably, it does not include the pricy $1521 sixth-year interval. It’s worth asking yourself how long you’ll own the car for before splurging on it.