Mitsubishi Express vs Toyota HiAce

What's the difference?

The Mitsubishi Express is an impressive return to the market for the brand, albeit one that won’t suit every buyer’s needs or wants. If you need to personalise your van, or if you value the safety technology offered by rivals like the HiAce, then you may need to shop elsewhere.

But if you do choose the Express, you will be getting a value-packed and very comfortable van that is backed by a broad dealer network and decent ownership prospects.

When you consider its competitive pricing (particularly for fleets), resolute resale value, robust construction, rock-solid reliability, excellent load-hauling ability, five-star safety and all-round practicality, it’s not hard to understand why the HiAce is such a popular workhorse. It’s not perfect, like any van, but when performing its intended role it’s very good.

The badges are different, and so is the front bumper and bonnet. But you might otherwise struggle to tell what’s changed between a Trafic and the Express.

One thing Mitsubishi is offering, though, is a standard three-seat cabin on all models, plus dual side sliding doors and rear barn doors across every variant in the line-up. That’s a win for hard workers.

Here’s a table of dimensions to help you size up which might be best for you:

As you can see, the extra size on offer in the LWB model is strictly nose to tail, with no other compromises to consider apart from, understandably, the larger turning circle. But Mitsubishi claims even the smaller version can cope with two pallets in the back.

As for cargo zone dimensions, here’s how the two body styles compare:

It’s worth noting that there is no high-roof option available, where you can get a taller body in most competitor vans. 

And while it is a bonus that there are barn doors (still not available on the HiAce), you can’t option a liftback tailgate. Plus, while the dual side sliding doors is an advantage as many OEMs charge extra for a driver’s side slider, you can’t option glazing for the rear door from Mitsubishi.

The company says that it is simply offering what it can get as part of the Alliance with Renault, but if you need to tailor a van to suit your specific needs, you might end up going with the French van (or the VW Transporter, which is the most configurable on the market). 

Check the engine specs section below for more specs on weights and capacities. Next, let’s take a look at the cabin, starting with some interior images.

Toyota’s unwavering adherence to rear-wheel drive ensures the HiAce has an inherent traction advantage over its predominantly front-wheel-drive rivals, particularly when hauling heavy payloads on low-grip surfaces.

Rear-wheel drive also ensures the front wheels can be turned sharply enough for its 3210mm wheelbase to deliver an impressively tight 11.0-metre turning circle. And its 1990mm height also allows access to underground loading docks and multi-storey car parks.

The chassis design is simple and robust with MacPherson strut front suspension, a leaf-spring live rear axle, variable-ratio rack and pinion steering and (on automatic variants) four-wheel disc brakes.

There’s no mesh-type cargo barrier or solid bulkhead between the cargo bay and cabin (but both are also available as genuine accessories) and the black door-handles and unpainted black plastic front and rear bumpers are designed to best withstand the wear and tear often evident in these areas on hard-working vans.

The two-tone dash layout is neat and functional, with clear analogue instrumentation and dash controls (mostly physical dials and buttons) that are easy to reach and operate. And it sticks with a good old lever-type manual handbrake instead of an electric one. All are chosen for their rugged simplicity.

The only useful item missing is a fold-down inboard armrest for the driver’s seat, offered by numerous rivals to reduce neck and shoulder strain during long days behind the wheel.

With a three-seater cabin as standard, the Express is already at an advantage over a HiAce. You can’t get a three-seat HiAce, and if you’ve got apprentices or workmates that always need a lift - but you don’t want the space sacrifice that comes with a crew van - it could be a crucial decision-maker for you.

And there are decent amenities for the occupants, too, with three cup holders and ample storage options across the dashboard, as well as large bottle holders in the doors. In fact, all told, Mitsubishi claims there is 43 litres of loose item storage in the cabin.

The driver’s seat gets manual height adjustment, lumbar adjustment and an armrest, as well as steering wheel rake and reach adjustment, so getting a comfortable driving position should be a cinch. Unlike the Trafic, there’s no driver’s seat heating option, but the clever “Load Through” cavity - for loading items up to 4.14m long - under the passenger seat is fitted on all models (but unlike the Trafic, which has a bulkhead, there’s no porthole, and the vehicles we tested with cargo cages didn’t have an opening to make the best use of this).

It’s set up for hard work, with rubber floor mats and a “hard wearing” poly trim on the steering wheel, though that finish is a bit coarse, and not as pleasant to hold as a leather wheel. The seat trim is fabric, and feels to be made of a durable material.

Ergonomically, it is no different to a Renault Trafic. Most important controls fall easily to hand, though people unfamiliar with Renault switchgear may need to pay attention at the dealership when the positioning of the cruise control and speed limiter buttons are explained. The buttons are between the dashboard and steering wheel.

And if you’re looking for the volume button, it’s on the weird little stalk behind the wheel itself. That has tuning and phone controls too, and it takes some getting used to. Further, if you’re used to the blinkers being on the “right” side of the steering wheel in Japanese cars, the Express is the exception. 

When it comes to media and infotainment, there’s a lot left to be desired. There is no touch screen at all, and you can’t option one, either. Some drivers will appreciate that, but others will lament the lack of smartphone mirroring tech (Apple CarPlay and Android Auto), and likewise there is no sat nav available, either. There’s not even a CD player, but as standard the Express gets a smartphone holster with USB port on top of the dash, so there are two USB ports to keep things charged, plus a 12-volt below if you need it.

But the simple media system does offer a USB port to connect your phone or MP3 player, and Bluetooth phone and audio streaming, as well as DAB digital and AM/FM radio. The sound system has just two speakers, but it’s okay.

The cargo zone is, as you’d expect, a big, largely empty space. There’s no steel bulkhead option to separate the two zones, which could be frustrating for some customers - though if you can deal with the noise reverberation but just want to make sure things don’t fly from front to rear, there is a mesh cargo barrier available.

There are 14 tie-down points in the SWB (eight floor mount, six wall mount) and 16 tie eyelets in the LWB (10 floor, six wall). Plus there’s a rear-mount 12-volt outlet near the back doors to keep things charged.

Our barn-door-equipped test vehicle has a hefty 2245kg kerb weight and 3300kg GVM, which results in a genuine one-tonne-plus payload rating of 1055kg. Up to 120kg of that weight can be carried on Toyota’s triple roof-rack set.

It’s also rated to tow up to 1500kg of braked trailer, which is less than some rivals but in reality should adequately cover most towing requirements of van operators.

And with its 4800kg GCM rating (or how much weight it can legally carry and tow at the same time), that means it can carry its maximum payload while towing its maximum trailer weight. So, that’s a combined total of more than 2.5 tonnes of cargo-carrying ability, which would comfortably meet or exceed most job requirements.

The generously-sized cargo bay, which offers an impressive 6.2 cubic metres of load volume, is accessed from either side through sliding doors with large 1010mm openings, or from the rear through the optional barn doors which can be opened to 180 degrees (with special lower hinges to hold them there) allowing easy access for forklifts.

The cargo bay is 2530mm long, 1760mm wide and 1340mm high and with 1268mm between the rear wheel housings it can swallow up to two standard Aussie pallets or up to three Euro pallets, held in place by a choice of six load-anchorage points.

There’s plenty of internal lighting, the walls and doors are lined to mid-height and the roof features a full-length internal lining, which is unusual for vans and we suspect contributes to suppression of tyre noise emanating from the rear wheel housings.

Cabin storage includes a large bottle holder and bin in the base of each front door, small-bottle/cupholders on either side of the dash and in the centre, plus a single glove box. The well-designed centre console offers another two bottle holders plus large internal storage, which is capped by a hinged lid that multi-tasks as a shallow storage tray and handy work desk.

Our test vehicle is equipped with Toyota’s ubiquitous 2.8-litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel shared by all models in the HiAce range. However, ours is equipped with the optional six-speed automatic and rear barn doors which raises the list price to $51,636.

Even so, that’s still within the ballpark of its closest rivals including the LDV G10+ Barn Door ($40,063), Hyundai Staria Load Barn Door ($46,740), and Ford’s new Transit Trend LWB Barn Door ($57,590).

Our example is also equipped with a solid-walled left-side sliding door (in preference to the standard offering with window), which HiAce buyers can specify at no extra cost when ordering.

The two-seater HiAce comes standard with 'French Vanilla' paint and 16-inch steel wheels with replaceable plastic covers, 215/70R16 tyres and a full-size spare, but there’s no protective load-floor liner for the cargo bay (a Toyota genuine accessory is available).

There’s also halogen headlights and DRLs (no fancy LEDs here, folks) and the neat two-tone cabin has a tilt/reach adjustable leather-accented steering wheel, power-adjustable lumbar support on the driver’s seat, one USB port and two 12-volt cabin sockets, plus a large centre console that offers numerous storage options.

The driver also gets a 4.2-inch driver’s info display and there’s an 8.0-inch touchscreen (plus steering wheel switches) to control the two-speaker infotainment system, which offers multiple connectivity including Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, Bluetooth, digital radio and more.

There are a couple of options available in the Express range.

Elect for a six-speed manual transmission and you get a 1.6-litre twin-turbo four-cylinder diesel engine producing 103kW of power (at 3500rpm) and 340Nm of torque (at 1500rpm). 

Choose the six-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission and the engine is a 2.0-litre four-cylinder single-turbo diesel motor, with 125kW of power (at 3500rpm) and 380Nm of torque (at 1500rpm). This engine meets a stricter emissions requirement than the other (Euro 6 vs Euro 5) because it has a 25-litre AdBlue urea treatment tank, though both have a diesel particulate filter (DPF), too. Depending on what side of the fence you sit, that’s either an advantage or an added cost and burden.

The Express is only available in front-wheel drive (FWD/2WD), so there’s no rear-wheel drive (RWD) or all-wheel drive (AWD/FWD) options available. 

Of course, you’ll need to consider weight if you’re buying a van like this. And it comes down to more than just engine specs - you need to consider payload, towing specifications, gross vehicle mass (GVM) and gross combination mass (GCM).

Here’s a table with the figures you need to know:

Wanting a petrol, hybrid, electric, plug-in hybrid or gas version of the Express? No can do… well, not in Australia, and not yet.

You will have to stay tuned for our full-scale Tradie Review on the Mitsubishi Express, where we will load it up to its GVM limit. But for day-to-day driving impressions, see the driving section below.

Toyota’s well-proven 1GD-FTV 2.8 litre four-cylinder turbo-diesel, which also powers Toyota’s HiLux, Fortuna and Prado model lines, produces 130kW at 3400rpm and (in auto models like ours) 450Nm of torque between 1600-2400rpm. Its Euro 5 emissions compliance doesn’t require AdBlue, which minimises maintenance and running costs.

The refined and smooth-shifting six-speed torque converter automatic offers the choice of sequential manual shifting if required. Fuel efficiency is also optimised with full torque converter lock-up on fourth, fifth and sixth gears, along with overdrive on fifth and sixth being ideal for highway driving. The inherent traction advantage of rear-wheel drive is enhanced by an electronically controlled automatic limited-slip diff.

Fuel consumption for the Mitsubishi Express depends on the engine/transmission combination you choose. 

The 1.6-litre twin-turbo manual version is the more frugal according to official combined cycle consumption figures, at 6.2 litres per 100 kilometres. Opt for the 2.0-litre single-turbo auto and the fuel consumption is claimed at 7.3 litres per 100 kilometres. 

Those figures are based on a driving loop that doesn’t incorporate loaded testing, so you can expect your real world consumption to be higher - but even so, the claims are lower than the likes of the HiAce (7.5L diesel manual, 8.2L diesel auto).

On test, for instance, I saw a return of 7.9L/100km in the SWB auto, which experienced a few traffic snarls in Sydney. The LWB auto with 200kg of ballast over the rear axle - in which I did 100km of mixed urban, interurban and freeway driving with free flowing traffic for the most part - had a displayed return of 7.8L100km. 

The fuel tank capacity is large, at 80 litres. That means theoretically excellent range on a single tank - up to 1290km if you can manage the claimed consumption in the manual model.

Toyota claims combined average consumption of 7.9L/100km for our test vehicle, but the dash readout was showing 11.0L/100km when we stopped to refuel after 270km of testing.

This was conducted with the engine’s auto start/stop function switched off and comprised a mix of city, suburban and highway driving, of which about one third was hauling a near-maximum payload.

Our own figure, calculated from actual fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was higher again at 11.8, which still isn’t bad for a vehicle with a kerb weight exceeding 2.2 tonnes driven mostly in busy urban traffic and hauling almost one tonne during our test. So, based on our ‘real-world’ consumption figures, you could expect a driving range of around 600km from its 70-litre tank.

If you’ve never driven a modern-day mid-size (2.5-3.5 tonne) van, you will be amazed at their road manners. There’s not a bad one in the class, in round terms, and the Express builds upon the Renault Trafic’s reputation as being among the best in the class for comfort and drivability.

It really is a pretty sweet appliance, with a ride quality that is mostly excellent whether you’re in the SWB or LWB model. It offers decent comfort and control at low speeds and high speeds, and is really only upset when the potholes are deep or have sharp edges. 

The SWB model has a slightly more pitchy ride when unladen, but we didn’t get a chance to put any weight in it just yet. The LWB model had 200kg of ballast over the rear axle, and that weight - combined with the extra 400mm of wheelbase - made for a very comfortable drive. Not too mushy or slushy, but actually nicely cushy. 

Aside from the low-speed electric whirring sound from the power steering, the steering is terrific - it is nicely weighted and pivots well, even the LWB model. Sure, it definitely feels its size, but it’s easily manageable and surprisingly agile for such a big rig, and easy enough to park as well, thanks to the split side mirrors and reversing camera (which pops up in the rear-view mirror and is quite small, but there are rear parking sensors to help out, too).

Because I sampled both automatic models, that meant I only had the chance to sample the 2.0-litre four-cylinder single-turbo diesel engine - and it’s a very strong performer.  

I never once felt like I needed any more pulling power with this - admittedly small - amount of weight on board. 

And the dual-clutch transmission is decent as well. You get away from a standing start pretty well, with just a little bit of turbo and transmission lag to contend with. It’s never annoying, even in traffic jam drudgery - unless the engine start stop system activates, and then it can be a little bit sluggish to get moving again.

However, as is the case with plenty of dual-clutch transmissions in commercial vehicles, it’s not quite as measured or linear in its progress when there’s no load on-board, tending to lurch away a little more when unladen.

And while we were hardly pushing the GVM limits with only 200kg in the back, the brake pedal of the LWB did feel at times like the push was a little longer than it should have been. 

It is a decently refined van, especially considering there’s no steel bulkhead to shield you from the noise intrusion at the rear. One thing, though - our test vans both had optional rubber mats fitted, and they were quite odorous. 

As mentioned the visibility is pretty decent, but I couldn’t help but feel jealous of a HiAce I overtook that had its blind-spot monitoring system flicker on the mirror. It would just add a little bit of extra piece of mind, as there’s no vision over your shoulder, and if you do have a load in the back it’s hard to see in the rearview mirror. And unlike other vans in the market, you can’t option rear windows, either. 

It’s easy for drivers of most shapes and sizes to find a comfortable driving position in the spacious cabin, given its height/reach adjustable steering wheel, large left footrest and supportive seating with power-adjustable lumbar support.

Although there’s a huge blind spot over the driver’s left shoulder created by the solid walls of the cargo bay, active driver aids including blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert and rear-view camera minimise the potential hazards of changing lanes and reversing out of driveways into busy traffic.

Braking is reassuringly strong and the steering is responsive, with easy manoeuvrability thanks to the conspicuously tight turning circle and lightness of the variable-ratio steering at parking speeds.

The ride quality is reasonably supple when unladen or lightly loaded and, for a van without a bulkhead between the cabin and cargo bay, has comparatively low internal noise levels at speeds up to 80km/h.

The 2.8-litre turbo-diesel, with its sizeable 450Nm of torque, has strong low-rpm response and displays good flexibility in city and suburban driving.

Its performance is optimised by the smooth-shifting six-speed auto, which also delivers fuel-efficient highway travel that requires less than 2000rpm to maintain 110km/h. The sequential manual-shifting function can be handy in certain situations, like carrying/towing heavy loads in hilly terrain.

To test its GVM rating we forklifted 890kg into the cargo bay, which combined with the driver equalled a total payload of 990kg that was only 65kg shy of its 1055kg limit.

The stout rear leaf-springs only compressed about 30mm under this loading, which left more than 60mm of static bump-stop clearance that was more than enough to ensure there was no bottoming-out on our test route.

The turbo-diesel’s ample torque made light work of hauling this payload in city, suburban and highway driving. It was also particularly strong in the hills, where it easily conquered our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km-long set climb in third gear.

Engine braking on the way down, in a manually selected second gear, wasn’t as strong but far from disgraced given the near one-tonne payload it was trying to restrain. Even so, its four-wheel disc brakes were more than capable of keeping speeds in check.

Our only criticism is the high internal noise levels at highway speeds, when tyre roar through the rear wheel housings can become intolerable over long distances, particularly on coarse bitumen surfaces with an empty cargo bay amplifying the noise.

In our experience, this is a problem shared by all vans at these speeds if they’re not equipped with a sealed cabin bulkhead. So, if your work involves a lot of highway travel, we would recommend fitting one that's available in Toyota’s genuine accessories range. Or buying some earplugs.

The HiAce has a five-star ANCAP rating awarded in 2019 which will expire in December 2025. It comes with seven airbags plus benchmark active safety features including AEB with pedestrian and daytime cyclist detection, lane departure alert with braking assist, speed sign recognition, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-traffic alert, front and rear parking sensors, reversing camera and more.

Mitsubishi is constantly dabbling in the long warranty promotional deals, but the standard warranty on offer for the Express is five years/100,000km.

The brand also has a capped price servicing plan for the first three years/45,000km of ownership. With intervals set at 12 months/15,000km, the costs are low, at $250 per visit.

And if you service your van with Mitsubishi’s dealer network, you will also get roadside assistance for up to four years.

If you’re wondering how that compares with the Renault plan? It’s a three-year/unlimited km warranty (but promotional five year/200,000km warranty plans are available until 31 August 2020). The Trafic has capped price servicing every 12 months or 30,000km intervals, or as determined by the oil sensor, at $599 per visit - but as of July 1 2020, it spans five years/150,000km, and is available with up to five years’ roadside assistance when maintained in-network. 

You might be curious about Mitsubishi Express problems - but it could be worth taking a look at the Renault Trafic problems page to find out if there have been issues around reliability, engine or transmission problems, recalls and common complaints.

It is covered by a five-year/unlimited km warranty. Scheduled servicing is a relatively short six months/10,000km intervals, whichever occurs first. Capped-price of $290 per service covers the first six scheduled services over three years or 60,000km.