Mitsubishi Triton vs Renault Kangoo

What's the difference?

The sixth-generation Triton is bigger, stronger, more powerful and more capable. By our measure, it’s the best one yet. It now matches the segment leaders on towing and payload ratings and, despite price increases, still represents compelling value for a high-quality Japanese ute. Mitsubishi has made choosing a dual cab ute from an already quality field even harder.

It’s an honest and willing little worker and, given the much lower purchase price compared to its VW Caddy Van equivalent, is worthy of consideration if you’re in the market for a small van. Just don’t expect premium safety at this end of the market. And Renault should show more confidence in Kangoo by backing it with a longer warranty than three years. 

New exterior styling features bold body contouring with a distinctive grille/headlight design. It’s also larger in key dimensions including body length (up 15mm), body width (up 50mm) and load tub length (up 35mm) for improved cabin space, comfort and load capacity.

The new body is mounted on a redesigned chassis-frame with significant gains in strength and torsional rigidity.

Track width is unchanged but there’s a substantial 130mm increase in wheelbase to 3130mm, which is longer than the HiLux (3085mm) and closer to the Ranger (3220mm) with noticeable improvements in ride quality and handling stability.

Off-road credentials include 228mm of ground clearance and 30.4 degrees approach/23.4 degrees ramp break-over/22.8 degrees departure angles.

The suspension tune for Australian-delivered Tritons comprises a unique front shock absorber/spring combination. The rear suspension has also been revised with larger shocks and lighter, more efficient leaf-springs to reduce unsprung weight for enhanced ride and handling.

Work-focused GLX models are equipped with ‘heavy-duty’ rear suspension, while the more luxurious GLS/GSR have softer-riding ‘standard’ rear suspension.

Another Triton first is a switch to electric power steering, for increased efficiency with lower steering effort. By contrast, Mitsubishi sticks with rear drum brakes, which with greater friction surface area than disc brakes can provide more ‘bite’ when parking with heavy loads or holding firm on hills when off-roading.

New GLS interior styling has a tasteful mix of contrasting surfaces, textured fabric seat-facings and white stitching, but also embraces traditional features like analogue speedo/tacho and a manual handbrake lever.

The wider body provides a noticeable increase in front shoulder room and the driver’s hip point has been raised, resulting in a more upright driving position with improved lower back support.

There are assist-handles on the A and B pillars to climb aboard and there’s easy access to the more spacious rear seat. Even big fellas like me (186cm) have about 60mm of head clearance and 40mm of knee clearance when sitting behind the driver’s seat in my position.

There are still no air-vents in the centre console for rear passengers, as Mitsubishi prefers to stick with its roof-mounted air circulator which draws in cooled or heated air from the front of the cabin and shares it with rear passengers (with their own fan-speed control) through slimline roof-vents.

This is a tried and tested formula that has earned the little French workhorse a loyal following, particularly in Europe. Its front wheel-drive chassis has a 2697mm wheelbase and 10.7-metre turning circle, with simple but robust MacPherson strut front suspension, rack and pinion steering, four-wheel disc brakes and a well-designed beam rear axle. This uses torsion bar primary springing supplemented by a pair of secondary coil springs for competent carrying of heavy loads.

The Compact lives up to its name with its 4213mm overall length and 1829mm width but the cabin is reminiscent of Doctor Who’s Tardis. The low seating height relative to the Kangoo’s 1815mm height, combined with its large glass areas, create a spacious and airy cabin environment with vast headroom you would not expect to find in such a small vehicle.

With its 2125kg kerb weight and 3200kg GVM, our test vehicle has a sizeable 1075kg payload rating, so it’s a genuine one-tonner like all models in the new Triton range.

It’s also rated to tow up to the class-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer, which is a significant 400kg increase over the previous generation and finally puts the Triton on par with segment leaders.

However, to avoid exceeding its 6250kg GCM (how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time), towing that weight would require a 450kg reduction in vehicle payload to 625kg.

Or you could reduce the trailer limit by the same amount (from 3500kg to 3050kg) and retain the Triton’s peak 1075kg payload. This combination would be ample for most work and recreational requirements, as few (if any) owners of utes this size need to tow 3500kg anyway.

The load tub’s internal dimensions are almost square, being 1555mm long and 1545mm wide with a 525mm depth. There’s also 1135mm between the rear wheel-housings, so it can take a Euro pallet.

There are fixed load-anchorage points front and rear and the GLS tub is protected by a slide-in liner.

Cabin storage for driver and front passenger includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door, an overhead glasses holder and upper and lower gloveboxes. The centre console has two small-bottle/cupholders plus a box at the rear with padded lid that doubles as a comfortable elbow rest.

Rear passengers get a bottle-holder in each door, large pockets on each front-seat backrest and two cupholders in the bench seat’s fold-down centre armrest. There’s also a 12-volt socket plus USB-A and USB-C ports in the rear of the centre console.

Like the previous Triton, there are no rear underfloor storage compartments and the seat’s base cushion is fixed, so you can’t swing it up and store in a vertical position, like numerous rivals, if more internal load space is required.

The Kangoo’s 1270kg tare weight and 1810kg GVM results in a 540kg payload rating. However, we always quote kerb weights (with full fuel tank) rather than tare weights (with only 10 litres of fuel) in our reviews to keep things consistent. So if you add the missing 46 litres of petrol (or about 36kg) to the published tare weight, that drops the payload to just over 500kg which is still a very useful half a tonne.

The EDC-equipped Kangoo also has no tow rating, so if you need that capability you’ll have to opt for the six-speed manual version which is rated to tow up to 1050kg of braked trailer.

The cargo bay in our test vehicle is accessed through non-glazed sliding doors on each side (with 635mm max opening) and the optional twin barn-doors at the rear. These feature 180-degree opening to assist forklift access, asymmetric design (to minimise visual obstructions in the rear-view mirror) and a demister/wiper/washer on the left-hand door.

The cargo bay’s 1476mm internal length, with 1218mm between the rear wheel housings, means it can take either an 1165mm-square Aussie pallet or 1200 x 800mm Euro pallet. There’s also 3.0 cubic metres of total load volume available.

The load floor has a protective mat and three cargo-securing points each side plus two more at mid-height. The doors and lower internal panels are lined and there’s neat plastic mouldings over the wheel housings. However, there’s no cargo protection behind the passenger seat and only two tubular steel protective bars behind the driver’s, so if you’re moving lots of heavy stuff we’d recommend either the optional steel bulkhead or an aftermarket steel mesh-type cargo barrier.

Standard cabin storage options include a bottle holder and storage bin in each door, a cave-like storage cubby in the centre dash-pad and a smaller one above the glovebox. The centre console has two cup holders and a lidded storage box that doubles as an armrest. The optional overhead cabin storage shelf fitted to our test vehicle is well designed and can hold heaps of stuff.

Our test vehicle is the L1 SWB (short wheelbase) Compact Van with 1.2 litre turbocharged petrol engine and six-speed EDC (Efficient Dual Clutch) automatic transmission for a list price of $26,990. Although that’s $2500 more than the six-speed manual version, it still undercuts its Caddy equivalent (TSI 220 SWB with 7-speed DSG) by $4300, which represents a substantial 14 per cent saving on purchase price alone.

The Compact is a no-frills work-focused van, as evidenced by its 15-inch steel wheels and 195/65R15 Michelin tyres (who'd have guessed) with full-size spare, hard-wearing black plastic front/rear bumpers and side body mouldings, rubberised cargo floor mat and twin-tubular steel cargo protection bars behind the driver’s seat.

There’s minimal standard equipment as you’d expect in such a workhorse, but it does include useful on-the-job features like rear parking sensors, height-adjustable steering column, non-radar cruise control and speed limiter, rear window demister/wiper, manual height-adjustable headlights (handy when load carrying), USB, 3.5mm auxiliary jack and 12-volt accessory plugs along with a basic multimedia system including AM/FM radio, CD player (remember those?) and Bluetooth with steering column controls.

Our test vehicle was fitted with Renault’s optional overhead cabin storage shelf and twin rear barn-doors. There are numerous other factory options like sat nav, cabin bulkhead, reversing camera etc along with Business Plus Pack and Trade Pack special option packages.

A new 4N16 variant of Mitsubishi’s 4N1 diesel engine family retains its predecessor’s 2.4-litre displacement but adds a second turbocharger. These work in sequence, with the smaller one providing fast response at low rpm and the larger one boosting performance at higher rpm.

The result is 150kW at 3500rpm and 470Nm of peak torque between 1500-2750rpm.

These outputs are 17kW and 40Nm more than the previous Triton and emissions are reduced with the addition of an AdBlue tank.

This engine is paired with an updated six-speed torque converter automatic and (on GLS and GSR) Mitsubishi’s excellent Super Select 4WD-II system with Torsen centre differential.

This still-advanced system offers seven drive modes, including full-time 4x4 which with the centre diff unlocked can be driven on all surfaces including dry sealed roads. With the centre diff locked for off-road use, it offers high and low range 4x4 with a 50:50 drive-split front and rear.

A rear diff-lock can also be engaged in low range.

This Euro 6-compliant 1.2-litre petrol engine is a variant of that shared by numerous Renault passenger cars, but with more power and torque tapped at lower rpm that’s better suited to this load-carrying workhorse role. In other words, it’s not peaky and has good flexibility, but does require 95-98 RON premium petrol.

The direct-injection turbocharged four-cylinder produces 84kW at 4500rpm. Its 190Nm of torque peaks at 2000rpm yet remains close to full strength all the way to 4000rpm, which is admirable for such a small engine and highlights the benefits of modern variable vane turbocharger technology.

It also offers a manually-switched ECO economy mode and Renault’s ESM (Energy Smart Management), which allows kinetic energy produced under deceleration/braking to be recovered by the engine’s alternator and stored in the battery. Given the amount of stops and starts in a typical working van’s life, Renault claims most of this recovered energy assists in engine starting.

The six-speed EDC dual-clutch automatic transmission provides brisk acceleration from standing starts and snappy near-seamless shifting, in either auto mode or when using the sequential manual shift function.

Mitsubishi claims an official combined average consumption of 7.7L/100km and the dash readout was displaying 8.7 at the completion of our 421km test, of which about one quarter was hauling a full payload. Our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was higher again at 9.7 but within the usual 2-3L/100km discrepancy between official and real-world figures. So, based on our numbers, you could expect a realistic driving range of around 770km from its 75-litre tank.

Renault’s official combined figure of 6.5L/100km looked optimistic given the dash readout was showing a 9.7 average at the end of our test, which covered just under 300km without the use of ECO mode and with more than a third of that distance under maximum GVM loading.

Our own figure, calculated from actual tripmeter and fuel bowser readings, worked out at 8.8L/100km. Therefore, based on our figures, you could expect a ‘real world’ driving range of around 630km from its 56-litre tank.

The ergonomic changes are noticeable when you get behind the wheel, with a more comfortable and supportive seating position and increased cabin width providing a more spacious feel.

The new electric power steering is another highlight, being communicative and nicely weighted at all speeds, while the unique Australian suspension tune results in a more planted and sure-footed feel. The ride quality is also smoother, which is no doubt enhanced by more sprung weight and a longer wheelbase.

The new bi-turbo engine has good response and flexibility, with its 1250rpm-wide peak torque band between 1500-2750rpm providing ample pulling power at lower speeds with a seamless transition to maximum power at 3500rpm.

The six-speed automatic has gearing and shift calibrations that optimise engine performance. It’s also a quiet and efficient highway cruiser, requiring only 1750rpm to maintain 110km/h which is also within its peak torque band.

To test its load-hauling ability, we loaded 890kg into the load tub, which with driver and luggage equalled one tonne of payload that was 75kg below its legal limit.

The 'standard' leaf-spring rear suspension compressed more than 60mm under this weight, leaving a finger-width of static bump-stop clearance which initially seemed inadequate.

However, the rubber bump-stops have central voids that provide more of a cushioning effect at full suspension travel than traditional hard-nosed designs, which minimises thumps over big bumps and ensures a smoother ride.

The Triton displayed sure-footed handling and braking with this near-maximum payload on board. The bi-turbo engine was also on top of the job, with its ‘twin-stage’ turbocharging making light work of city, suburban and highway driving.

It also impressed on our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set-climb at 60km/h, self-shifting down to third gear to easily haul this load to the summit. Engine-braking on the way down was not as robust, but in our experience typical of sub-3.0-litre turbo-diesels restraining one tonne payloads on steep descents.

Our only gripe is the ‘Driver Attention Alert’ function. Its prominent detection module mounted on the steering column partly obscures the driver’s view of the lower instrument panel. And its over-sensitivity in determining driver inattention (like wearing sunnies, looking left and right at T-intersections etc) becomes annoying and needs refinement.

Thanks to the twin rear barn-doors we were easily able to load a 325kg weight block with the forklift, which combined with our crew of two was line-ball with the vehicle’s payload limit of just over 500kg. The rear suspension only compressed 40mm with heaps of bump-stop clearance remaining, while the nose dropped a mere 8mm.

Over a heavily patched and notoriously bumpy section of bitumen back road there was not a hint of bottoming-out and the Kangoo would not be thrown off-line or lose its composure over a variety of other roads on our test route.

This included our 13 per cent gradient 2.0km-long set climb at 60km/h. The dual-clutch automatic  self-shifted down to third gear, where the engine settled at around 3000rpm to easily pull its maximum payload to the top. Engine braking on the way down though was almost non-existent, but not unexpected given its small cubic capacity and the load it was trying to restrain. Fortunately, the four-wheel disc brakes were more than capable of compensating for that shortfall.

As a tradie’s vehicle its applications are limited by its diminutive size, half-tonne payload capacity and lack of towing ability. However, there are plenty of other job requirements for which the Kangoo could be well suited, particularly city delivery work.

Its four-star ANCAP rating was achieved a decade ago (2011) and is overdue for an upgrade. There’s no AEB and a reversing camera is optional, but you can only get that with the optional rear barn-doors and R-Link sat-nav multimedia system.

At the very least, the option of glazed cargo bay side doors should be available. Even so, there’s driver and passenger front and side airbags, rear parking sensors and an active safety menu including hill-start assist, Grip Xtend (intelligent traction control) and more.

Five years/100,000km standard warranty, or 10 years/200,000km if serviced at Mitsubishi dealers. Servicing every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first. Capped-price for 10 scheduled services up to 10 years/150,000km is $6690, or an average of $669 per service.

The Kangoo comes with a three years/unlimited km warranty. Scheduled servicing every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first. Capped-price servicing of $349 for the first three scheduled services.