Browse over 9,000 car reviews
What's the difference?
This version of Tesla’s Model Y is the new frontier for enthusiasts. How do you make an electric performance car?
It should be easy, right? Just up the power of the motors - no need to fit a larger, more complex engine, and make sure you’ve got a battery with the appropriate outputs.
There’s far more than meets the eye. The big question is, is it worth the significant additional spend over the base Model Y?
We grabbed one of the earliest examples of the Performance to hit Australian shores to find out.
Have you been tempted to hop into a fully electric SUV? With fuel prices the way they are, it’s understandable. But what if you’re not ready for the jump? What if you want the convenience of combustion with the ability to drive emissions free day-to-day?
A plug-in hybrid might be for you, and Volvo’s freshly updated XC60 offers a lot of appealing features in its electrified form.
It has to be more than just another plug-in hybrid, though, since the luxury mid-size SUV segment is one of the most competitive for this type of technology.
Does the new and improved XC60 Recharge have what it takes? Read on to find out.
One thing is for sure, it’s definitely a performance car, but not as we know it.
This version of the Tesla Model Y is the ultimate tech gadget on four wheels. It’s incredibly fast, has unbelievable, unnerving handling, and importantly what seems to be the best software in the business. Coming in significantly cheaper than its European performance EV rivals, it doesn’t even seem like bad value.
But. Enthusiasts be warned. There is an element of drama missing here, the Model Y is almost too good at attacking the road, there’s no roaring feedback or imperfections for you to correct, and for this reason alone, even if it’s the future, I don’t think it’s going to be for everyone.
The XC60 continues to be a suave European premium SUV, which doesn’t need to try too hard to be sporty or luxurious, because it just is.
The electrified features of this Recharge version fall to the wayside behind the wheel, enhancing the quietness and comfort of the XC60 without making it feel too foreign for first-time electric car adopters, yet beneath the surface there’s still a level of engagement to be had for enthusiasts looking towards a zero-emission future.
While plug-ins will continue to be a hard sell for Australians into at least the near future, this one nails the Volvo brand promise of being an approachable family SUV.
If you’ve seen one Tesla, you’ve pretty much seen them all, with the Model Y Performance doing little to set itself apart from the rest of the range.
It’s all part of Tesla’s minimalist Silicon Valley aesthetic. Like various models of iPhone, the changes between models are meant to be felt and not seen.
The Uberturbine wheels are of course a highlight, really filling the arches compared to the standard hub cab-wearing ones which ship on the standard Model Y, but they are also the only option on the Performance, too bad if you’re not a fan of matt black.
On the inside there are no surprises, either. The same minimalist aesthetic applies, as usual to a fault.
I feel like I’m sitting in the Apple Store, with just a big floating tablet being the main decoration.
Our car had the wood-look trim option, which is the most preferable option of the two. I found the white plastic fill alternative a bit cheap-feeling during my test of the standard Model Y.
I think the minimalism of the Model Y’s cabin will help it age well, but as I usually complain about these Tesla cabins. There’s no dash cluster or even a head-up display which feels like a bit of a usability blunder. Who wants to look at a centre display for critical information on the car?
To me at least, the Volvo XC60 is one of, if not the best design in the luxury mid-size SUV segment. This is a car which effortlessly exudes its premium nature, unlike many of its rivals straying away from the temptation to hammer you over the head with sporty flourishes.
Simple lines and limited application of chrome pair with big wheels, tastefully applied gloss black highlights, and the Swedish brand’s signature ‘Thor’s hammer’ headlight profile to make for something friendly and approachable, but distinctly upmarket and uniquely Volvo.
This is more true than ever when this car is viewed from the rear, where it maintains Volvo’s signature upright tail-light designs, and text rather than a logo across the boot lid, which, for the record, the brand was doing before it was trendy.
On the inside this Scandinavian pragmatism continues with a brilliantly simple dash shape, with delicate highlight elements finished tastefully in patterned aluminium. There might be a touch too much piano gloss for some, this is a surface which is hard to keep free of dust and fingerprints, but the real highlight piece of the dash is the portrait touchscreen.
Offering slick Android software with mostly, mercifully large touch elements, and transitions mostly free of jarring lag, it feels good to use, too.
While the seats are sportier than some may expect from Volvo, they still have the comfort which the brand is well known for in the plush trim.
I wish more premium cars were designed like this Volvo. It’s distinctive, luxurious, and as you’ll find out next, practical, too.
The Model Y feels much bigger than the Model 3 so it will definitely hit the sweet spot for people who wanted a Tesla but found the Model 3 too cramped for a family.
Everywhere feels expanded, especially headroom, and the minimalist design leaves room for big door pockets and the flat floor leaves room for extra large stowage areas under the centre console.
I especially like the way the dual wireless chargers integrate with the design here.
There are a few hidden hard plastics, but Tesla has put soft-touch and padded surfaces in all the right areas.
The seats are reasonably comfortable, but I’m not sure how the synthetic leather trim will age in the Australian sun particularly as there’s no way to cover the big panoramic sunroof.
Not everyone has a garage. Interestingly though the car does have a cabin overheat protection function, which automatically starts the air conditioning should the cabin exceed a certain temperature.
Still, there are a lot of months in the year our brutal sun will be cooking the interior.
If you’ve read any of my Tesla reviews before, you’ll know I’m not a huge fan of the need to control pretty much all of the car's key functions through the central touchscreen.
It feels like a shame to complain about this, because the software is truly beautiful, and Tesla backs it with powerful computer hardware to keep the screen fast and responsive.
But having no dash cluster feels like a bit of a design-over-usability trait, especially when you go to adjust some of this car’s settings on the fly.
The XC60 matches its squared-off exterior angles with a big interior. The driving position offers a high roof and plenty of adjustability, and while it compares well in terms of space compared to its rivals, there are electric mid-size SUVs which are now opening cabins up even more by deleting the raised centre console area.
While we always like to see a set of tactile buttons and dials, particularly for climate functions, there are shortcuts for the front and rear defogger, and a nice big dial for volume control.
Thanks to big windows and wing mirrors, the XC60 is easy to see out of in every direction, bolstered by its amazing 360-degree parking camera. For a mid-sizer, it’s a well equipped city-slicker.
The rear seat offers plenty of knee room for me behind my own seating position (at 182cm tall), and although the seat bases are higher than they are in the front and there’s a panoramic sunroof, I still had sufficient headroom.
The middle seat is an unfortunate story, as a large transmission tunnel (which now houses the battery pack) consumes any semblance of legroom, making it hardly suitable for adults.
Proving its family credentials, though, the XC60 range offers a built-in booster seat on the outboard rears, alongside the usual array of dual ISOFIX and three top-tether mounts.
In terms of storage there are nets on the backs of the front seats and small bottle holders (will fit 300ml cans or bottles but not 500ml ones) in the doors, with a further two in the drop-down armrest (as well as a ski port behind - naturally). There are also adjustable air vents in the B pillars, although the climate functions can only be controlled via the central touchscreen in the front. Finally, there’s an odd small shelf and dual USB-C outlets on the back of the centre console.
The XC60 has a boot capacity of 468-litres (VDA) which is big but not huge for the mid-size SUV segment. It easily fit the whole CarsGuide luggage set, and there’s a helpful amount of room under the boot floor for the storage of charging cables. This area also hosts the compressor for the air suspension and a tyre repair kit. Cleverly, when you park the car or open the boot, the air suspension lowers for best access.
This is a far cry from an affordable EV. Forget your MG ZS EVs, BYD Atto 3s and even base Teslas, because the Model Y Performance is in a different league when it comes to price and ability.
To give you an idea, the entry-point Model Y tends to float around $70,000 once you add on-road costs, sometimes slightly more. This Performance version takes a massive hike to nearly $100,000, before on-road costs, and the example we drove for this test totalled $108,031.
The trouble with the Performance version is it’s so expensive it doesn’t qualify for electric car rebates, and in fact attracts luxury car tax instead, pushing the price ever higher.
To add insult to injury, there’s not even a whole lot on the outside of this car to tip you off it costs nearly $40,000 more than the entry-level version, with the main hint being the 21-inch 'Uberturbine' wheels.
If you look even more closely you might notice it rides a little lower than the standard car, has bigger brakes, and a little carbon-fibre lip spoiler attached to the tailgate.
Most of the changes are under the skin, including an alternate suspension tune, second motor on the front axle, and a lot of additional power.
Tesla, famously shy about sharing specifics, only gives a 0-100km/h sprint time, which improves from 6.9 to 3.7 seconds for the Performance.
The battery is larger, too, boosting range from 455km on the base Model Y to 514km.
On the inside expect the standard Tesla stuff, like synthetic leather interior trim, the huge 15-inch centre tablet screen with integrated nav and always online connectivity, dual wireless chargers, and a panoramic sunroof.
The whole look and feel is super slick, as always, but is notably missing Apple CarPlay or Android Auto. Tesla is hoping you’ll use built-in versions of all your favourite apps. Too bad if you use one which isn’t offered.
LED headlights, performance tyres, and a power tailgate add to the gear list, but interestingly there’s no V2L - one key feature still missing from the Tesla brand, and something which adds a slight advantage to its rivals from Kia and Hyundai.
Of course, the software is the biggest sell. As though to prove Tesla is a software company first and a car brand second, the software in this car is by far the best on the market.
It’s super slick, and offers the most feature packed and functional app. It’s stuff like this which is hard to go back from, and is still keeping Teslas feeling more futuristic than most electric rivals.
It’s worth noting: even at this inflated price, the Model Y Performance still seems like decent value given how quick it is.
The only comparisons, cars like the Porsche Taycan, Audi e-tron GT, and BMW iX cost more, with the exception of the Kia EV6 GT which is similarly priced and offers similar specs and features.
This is currently the most expensive XC60 you can buy. Wearing a base price of $100,990, before on-road costs, at the time of writing, the Recharge plug-in hybrid sits atop a three-variant range, which also consists of the base B5 ($72,990) and B6 ($85,990) mild-hybrids.
It competes in the luxury mid-size SUV segment, which is most congested in Australia for plug-in hybrids. Rivals include the BMW X3 xDrive 30e ($107,000), outgoing Mercedes-Benz GLC 300e ($94,124 - the PHEV one won’t be replaced when the new generation arrives), and the latest arrival to the space, the Lexus NX 450h+ ($88,323).
The PHEV is only available in the ‘Ultimate’ XC60 trim level, which, as the name suggests, is the most feature-laden. While it is significantly more expensive than the standard versions of the car, Volvo throws in some serious, otherwise-optional kit to tempt you to go PHEV.
Standard gear includes massive 21-inch alloy wheels, full LED head and tail-lights, leather-accented interior trim with power adjustable front seats, charcoal interior colour scheme with aluminium mesh detailing, dual-zone climate control (the PHEV is the only one to get dual instead of quad), a 9.0-inch portrait-oriented multimedia touchscreen with wired Apple CarPlay (but no Android Auto as it runs the Android Automotive operating system), a wireless phone charger, a 12-inch digital instrument cluster, and a 360-degree parking camera as part of its comprehensive safety suite.
Adding to the value equation, and closing the gap with the next grade down, the Recharge scores otherwise-optional gear, including an extremely good Bowers & Wilkins audio system (normally a crazy $4300 option), the very welcome air suspension ($2700), and a panoramic sunroof ($3250).
This option-added strategy is replicated by its rivals, although it still places the XC60 as the second-most expensive of its peers. As with all PHEVs, though, there’s more to the story when it comes to range performance, and charging, so you’ll need to read further to see how the XC60 compares.
Tesla, always mysterious when it comes to hard specs, does not offer official power and torque figures for any of its models. Just the ever-impressive 0-100km/h sprint times.
However, looking at documentation the brand has officially filed in China (where the Model Y for our market is built) reveals specs of 220kW/440Nm for the rear motor, and 137kW/219Nm for the front motor, placing it pretty far up there in the EV performance charts.
It’s not just raw power, either. The Model Y performance also scores a lowered ride, bigger brakes, impressive torque vectoring software to keep everything under control, and interestingly, what Tesla tells us is a new suspension tune (even newer than the set-up we tested when the Model Y first arrived in Australia in late 2022.)
It’s all very impressive-sounding, but does it work? Read on to find out.
The plug-in hybrid world is just as, if not more complicated than the fully electric world, mainly because there are so many ways to implement a system which blends an electric motor with the driving force of the combustion engine.
In the case of the XC60, the solution is particularly clever. Up front is a 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder engine, which produces 233kW/400Nm. As though this wasn’t already enough performance, there’s an electric motor on the rear axle, producing a further 107kW/309Nm.
Interestingly, there’s no all-wheel drive hardware, with the centre tunnel being filled with battery instead. This means the XC60 theoretically has better balance than some of its rivals which simply place the battery under the boot floor, but it also creates the strange situation where this SUV is rear-wheel drive when driving in electric mode, but front-wheel drive under combustion power. The two blend nicely using software to facilitate all-wheel drive.
The combustion engine drives the front wheels via an eight-speed traditional torque converter automatic.
The battery is particularly large for the segment at 18.8kWh, allowing the XC60 Recharge a 77km purely electric driving range according to the WLTP standard, which is ahead of its rivals.
The Model Y Performance has an official, WLTP-rated consumption number of 15.4kWh/100km, which grants the car a 514km driving range.
Few EVs manage to get over the 500km range mark, so this fact alone is pretty impressive.
In our testing the car returned a higher figure of 18.7kWh/100km, reducing range to the mid-400s on a full charge.
We only had the car for three days, so I expect, like the standard Model Y, it would be possible to get close to the official number with a longer-term test.
When it comes to charging, the Model Y can hit an impressive 250kW on a fast DC charger, allowing a charge time of around half an hour on a compatible unit. Expect more like an hour and a half on a more common 50kW unit.
Meanwhile the slow AC charger will hit a peak of 11kW, allowing the Model Y to charge from 10 per cent in more like seven hours. Still, adding roughly 75km of range an hour is worth it for longer stays at shopping centres or the like.
Interestingly, the Model Y doesn’t offer V2L, that is - the ability to power devices from its charging port. It seems to be one key piece of EV equipment missing from its spec list.
Like many PHEVs the XC60 has an impressively low official fuel consumption of just 1.6L/100km. This, however, assumes the battery gets charged. As with any PHEV, you’ll want to ensure you have a place to charge it, too.
This is primarily because the XC60, despite its long electric range and large battery, has a 3.6kW inverter, limiting its charge time (from the base level to full) to between four and five hours, no matter where you plug it in.
A charge speed so slow means it is difficult to maintain a level of charge using public AC sockets. This is a PHEV which needs to be charged in a garage overnight. If you live in a unit or have to make do with on-street parking, the Lexus NX 450h+ is a better pick, with its battery charging at twice the speed on a public outlet.
Once it is charged, though, the XC60 has one of the longer ranges for a PHEV in its class, with the 77km WLTP range working out for me to be about 65km in the real world. Not bad.
My consumption numbers for the week came out as 3.4L/100km of fuel, and 18kWh/100km of energy. Decent figures, especially since I ran it out of charge on more than one occasion.
I’ll just cut to the chase here: Sorry Musk haters, the Model Y Performance is truly, deeply impressive.
I didn’t stopwatch test its 0-100km/h sprint time, but 3.7 seconds certainly feels possible, and totally visceral.
Yes, the Model Y Performance will turn your groceries into a fine paste on the back of the boot if you stick your foot in, but the sprint time is far from the most impressive part of the drive experience.
I’d hand this honour over to the handling. The Model Y is simply incredible at holding onto the road.
Try as I might on one of Sydney’s best and curviest roads, the Model Y simply wouldn’t misbehave.
It’s almost surreal feeling the computers work their magic in the corners, taming the physics of a 2.0-tonne SUV, constantly fighting understeer or oversteer on the fly to keep it all tidy.
It does all of this in silence, with just the tyre roar to indicate your velocity. I must admit. I didn’t expect such ferocious ability from this car.
I certainly expected speed, but not this level of tidiness for something heavier and taller than a Model 3.
The trouble for a traditional car enthusiast, then, is the fact the Model Y is almost too good. It’s clinical in the way it attacks the road, and feels almost unfair, artificial, as though a computer is doing the work for you (it might as well be).
It feels risk-free, drama-free, feedback-free. While the experience of driving such a machine is nothing short of incredible, I somehow think it’s not the kind of thrills combustion enthusiasts are looking for.
Even the steering is artificial, with three heavily computer-assisted modes. I must say, 'Sport' and 'Standard' are a bit too heavy, with my preferred steering mode being the 'Chill' setting, which is the lightest and makes the car feel a bit easier to wrangle in the corners.
The three regen modes will actually appeal to a variety of tastes, allowing the car to behave either like a single-pedal EV (my preferred mode) or more like a combustion car, with a creep mode and a roll mode which will be more familiar to those who haven’t experienced an EV before, or are not fans of regenerative braking.
The new suspension has improved the ride significantly, with the Model Y Performance lacking the brittle edge which I experienced when the Model Y first arrived a few months ago.
It feels like it deals with sudden jolts a bit better, but make no mistake, this is still a firm ride, and the Y still has a firm frame.
While the ride has improved, it is still susceptible to significant amounts of jiggle, with the ride being notably busy over poor road surfaces. Still, it’s good to see this common issue with Teslas starting to move in the right direction.
The XC60 Recharge is an interesting car to drive. The first thing you’ll notice is how quiet it is. The sound deadening is impressive, as is the smooth and silent electric drive, and even the engine, unless pushed hard, is quiet enough that it’s hard to tell when the car switches between its two power sources.
The steering offers a pleasant balance of electrical assistance and mechanical feedback, suited to the character of the car, and the ride is similarly forgiving despite the large alloy wheels.
This is a hybrid which hides the additional weight of its batteries well, again courtesy of the air suspension, which actively balances out the sway of the additional heft, and filters out what could otherwise be a crashy ride.
To give you an idea of the way this car feels, it’s nowhere near as sharp or sporty as the BMW X3 xDrive 30e, but feels better balanced, less cumbersome, and rides better than the Mercedes GLC 300e or Lexus NX 450h+.
The software is very clever, not only seamlessly blending the combustion front axle with the electrified rear, but also having the digital dash showing you the cut-off points for both the engine turning on and where the mechanical brakes will take over from the regenerative braking.
On this topic, the XC60 doesn’t have single-pedal regenerative braking, at least not in the default hybrid driving mode, relying instead on a fully blended system. This means it will blend the regenerative properties in with the mechanical properties depending on how hard the brake pedal is pressed.
While this is a clever piece of software trickery, like seemingly everything in the XC60 Recharge, it seems to be designed to make the drive experience similar to combustion versions. This makes it approachable, but to extract the ideal level of efficiency from the electric features, you’ll need to factor in the ideal stopping distance from traffic.
With the battery charged it’s lovely as an electric car, but the combustion engine is a strong performer, too, with the two combining to make for a very fast SUV in a straight line.
Finally, in terms of altering the drive experience, the XC60 Recharge offers fully electric, hybrid, and fully combustion driving modes, with settings to offer control over the charge level. Want to drive it as a Toyota-style hybrid? You can; just put it in hybrid mode and ask it to maintain battery level. Want to run only combustion to save your charge for when you exit the freeway and are driving around town? You can do that, too. You can even ask the car to use the combustion engine to charge the battery. Not the most environmentally conscious feature, but one not all PHEVs offer.
There’s a lot to like then, it’s quick but not too sharp, focusing instead largely on being comfortable, familiar, and quiet, suiting the family-friendly appeal of the Volvo brand.
Teslas are very impressive when it comes to safety, with an almost unprecedented number of sensors, and, importantly, great software to process what the car sees.
This is best seen through the radar screen which the car displays alongside the map, which is constantly collecting data on what the car sees around it.
It gives you confidence the car has seen and categorised a potential threat, usually before you have, and if ANCAP’s testing is anything to go by, it works, too.
The Model Y, including this Performance variant, wears a maximum five ANCAP stars, performing extremely well across all categories, with a particularly high score in ‘adult occupant protection’, and ‘Safety Assist’ which considers the abilities of its automatic safety systems.
While the Model Y’s suite is broader than individual standard active safety items offered by other brands, equivalents of most systems like auto emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, lane keep assist, and things like traffic sign recognition are on-board.
Even the adaptive cruise control is one of the best on the market, remarkably good at lane keeping and steering assist, but I’d question whether it’s worth splashing for the controversial 'Full Self Driving' option.
Coming in at more than $10,000, it’s questionable if any of the included software features are even legal to use.
Another pillar of the Volvo brand is safety, and the XC60 wants for almost nothing on this front.
Active items include freeway speed auto emergency braking with pedestrian, cyclist, intersection, and even large animal detection, lane keep assist with lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, adaptive cruise control, driver attention alert, and traffic sign recognition.
There is a standard array of airbags for the first and second row, as well as the expected electronic stability, brake, and traction controls.
The XC60 range was awarded a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating in 2017, although the plug-in hybrid versions are excluded for the time being.
It’s a good question: What’s it like to own a Tesla. Some of the numbers aren’t promising, like, for example, the four-year and 80,000km warranty promise which is one of the shortest new car warranties on the market right now.
However, Tesla does cover the high voltage battery and drive components for a much longer eight years and 192,000km, guaranteeing 70 per cent of the car’s original battery capacity at that time.
Teslas have condition-based servicing (because, of course they do), meaning the car will tell you when it wants to visit a Tesla workshop based on various inputs. Seems logical, but not very transparent.
The XC60 is covered by a five-year and unlimited kilometre warranty, and there are four years of the Google connected services included, too.
The high-voltage components are covered by an eight year warranty.
Service plans are available in either three or five year forms, the pricing for which is at the more premium end of the scale.
A three year pack costs $1750 ($583 a year) while a five-year plan costs $3000 ($600 a year).
You get four years of Google’s online services included for the multimedia functions, and Volvo warns ‘additional costs’ may apply after this period to keep the car online.