Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi Triton

What's the difference?

The Ford Ranger XL 4x2 Double Cab combines strong performance with a one-tonne-plus payload rating, 3500kg towing ability, spacious cabin and excellent ride/handling.

However, it could be even better without the penny-pinching evident in the lack of rear passenger air-vents/USB etc found in some 4x2 rivals. Even so, for workhorse buyers, there’s plenty to like here.

The sixth-generation Triton is bigger, stronger, more powerful and more capable. By our measure, it’s the best one yet. It now matches the segment leaders on towing and payload ratings and, despite price increases, still represents compelling value for a high-quality Japanese ute. Mitsubishi has made choosing a dual cab ute from an already quality field even harder.

All Ranger XL 4x2s are called ‘Hi-Riders’ as they share the same ride height as their 4x4 siblings. As a result, they also benefit from the same ground clearance/approach/departure angles, which can be handy if there's some rugged terrain in your line of work.

Braking is a front disc/rear drum combination but you’d struggle to feel the difference between this and the four-wheel discs of higher-grade models, given how well Ford has refined the set-up over the years.

The Ranger XL is a chrome-free zone as you'd expect, with the interior featuring many shades of grey and a conspicuous number of plastic caps in places where buttons/switches are found in more luxurious variants.

Even so, the cabin is neat and functional for this role. Rear seat space is excellent, even for tall people like me (186cm). There’s also ample headroom, which contributes to the spacious feel.

Our only gripes are the absence of air-vents and a USB port in the rear of the centre console, which come standard in rivals like Isuzu’s D-Max SX.

New exterior styling features bold body contouring with a distinctive grille/headlight design. It’s also larger in key dimensions including body length (up 15mm), body width (up 50mm) and load tub length (up 35mm) for improved cabin space, comfort and load capacity.

The new body is mounted on a redesigned chassis-frame with significant gains in strength and torsional rigidity.

Track width is unchanged but there’s a substantial 130mm increase in wheelbase to 3130mm, which is longer than the HiLux (3085mm) and closer to the Ranger (3220mm) with noticeable improvements in ride quality and handling stability.

Off-road credentials include 228mm of ground clearance and 30.4 degrees approach/23.4 degrees ramp break-over/22.8 degrees departure angles.

The suspension tune for Australian-delivered Tritons comprises a unique front shock absorber/spring combination. The rear suspension has also been revised with larger shocks and lighter, more efficient leaf-springs to reduce unsprung weight for enhanced ride and handling.

Work-focused GLX models are equipped with ‘heavy-duty’ rear suspension, while the more luxurious GLS/GSR have softer-riding ‘standard’ rear suspension.

Another Triton first is a switch to electric power steering, for increased efficiency with lower steering effort. By contrast, Mitsubishi sticks with rear drum brakes, which with greater friction surface area than disc brakes can provide more ‘bite’ when parking with heavy loads or holding firm on hills when off-roading.

New GLS interior styling has a tasteful mix of contrasting surfaces, textured fabric seat-facings and white stitching, but also embraces traditional features like analogue speedo/tacho and a manual handbrake lever.

The wider body provides a noticeable increase in front shoulder room and the driver’s hip point has been raised, resulting in a more upright driving position with improved lower back support.

There are assist-handles on the A and B pillars to climb aboard and there’s easy access to the more spacious rear seat. Even big fellas like me (186cm) have about 60mm of head clearance and 40mm of knee clearance when sitting behind the driver’s seat in my position.

There are still no air-vents in the centre console for rear passengers, as Mitsubishi prefers to stick with its roof-mounted air circulator which draws in cooled or heated air from the front of the cabin and shares it with rear passengers (with their own fan-speed control) through slimline roof-vents.

Thanks to its relatively light 2093kg kerb weight, our test vehicle’s 3250kg GVM allows for an impressive 1157kg payload rating.

It’s also rated to tow up to the category-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer and given its big 6200kg GCM (or how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time) that would still leave a generous payload capacity of more than 600kg.

These are strong numbers well suited to a variety of heavy-hauling tasks.

The load tub’s floor is 1547mm long and 1584mm wide with 1224mm between the wheel housings, allowing it to carry an 1165mm-square Aussie pallet which can be secured using a choice of six load-anchorage points (three each side).

A steel-framed bulkhead doubles as robust protection for the cabin’s rear window and a handy place on which to lean and secure items that are too long to fit in the tub.

Its flush-fitting load retainers can pivot and lock into a vertical position on each side, to effectively ‘book-end’ loads when securing them.

The tub has internal lighting thanks to small but bright LEDs embedded in the sidewalls. These are welcome not only when accessing the tub at night or in poorly-lit internal spaces, but also if it's fitted with a hard tonneau cover.

There are concave side-steps behind the rear wheels, which make accessing the load tub easier and safer than standing on top of the tyres as owners often do, because if they're wet or muddy it’s easy to slip off.

Six plastic caps (three each side) along the top edges of the sidewalls can be removed to provide access to internal mounting points for numerous structures, like ladder racks.

The top edge of the tailgate incorporates a 1.3-metre ruler and a pair of spring-loaded ‘trapdoors’ which provide access to the tailgate’s internal cavity.

This allows for the use of G-clamps, which can be inserted into these holes when using the open tailgate as a workbench to clamp materials in place when cutting, drilling, sanding, etc.

Front-of-cabin storage includes dual bottle holders and a bin in each door, plus an overhead glasses holder and, on the passenger’s side, an open shelf with glove box below.

The centre console has open storage up front, a pair of small-bottle/cupholders in the centre and a lidded-box at the back which doubles as a driver’s elbow rest.

Rear seat passengers get a bottle holder and bin in each door, another bin in the rear of the centre console and a pocket on the front passenger seat’s backrest, but with no fold-down centre armrest there are no dedicated cupholders.

The one-piece seat base can also swing up and be stored vertically if more internal luggage space is required, or to access two large underfloor storage compartments.

With its 2125kg kerb weight and 3200kg GVM, our test vehicle has a sizeable 1075kg payload rating, so it’s a genuine one-tonner like all models in the new Triton range.

It’s also rated to tow up to the class-benchmark 3500kg of braked trailer, which is a significant 400kg increase over the previous generation and finally puts the Triton on par with segment leaders.

However, to avoid exceeding its 6250kg GCM (how much it can legally carry and tow at the same time), towing that weight would require a 450kg reduction in vehicle payload to 625kg.

Or you could reduce the trailer limit by the same amount (from 3500kg to 3050kg) and retain the Triton’s peak 1075kg payload. This combination would be ample for most work and recreational requirements, as few (if any) owners of utes this size need to tow 3500kg anyway.

The load tub’s internal dimensions are almost square, being 1555mm long and 1545mm wide with a 525mm depth. There’s also 1135mm between the rear wheel-housings, so it can take a Euro pallet.

There are fixed load-anchorage points front and rear and the GLS tub is protected by a slide-in liner.

Cabin storage for driver and front passenger includes a bottle-holder and bin in each door, an overhead glasses holder and upper and lower gloveboxes. The centre console has two small-bottle/cupholders plus a box at the rear with padded lid that doubles as a comfortable elbow rest.

Rear passengers get a bottle-holder in each door, large pockets on each front-seat backrest and two cupholders in the bench seat’s fold-down centre armrest. There’s also a 12-volt socket plus USB-A and USB-C ports in the rear of the centre console.

Like the previous Triton, there are no rear underfloor storage compartments and the seat’s base cushion is fixed, so you can’t swing it up and store in a vertical position, like numerous rivals, if more internal load space is required.

Our test vehicle is the GLS, which sits above the GLX and GLX+ and below the premium GSR in the Triton’s traditional four-model range. It’s available only with a 2.4-litre bi-turbo four-cylinder turbo-diesel and six-speed automatic shared by all models, but its sophisticated Super Select 4WD-II system is exclusive to GLS and GSR grades.

List price is $59,090 plus on-road costs, which represents a substantial price increase over the previous generation. However, you’re getting more truck for your buck. And it’s still good value for a second-from-top model grade, given similar-priced Ford Ranger and Toyota HiLux rivals are on lower rungs of their model-ladders.

The GLS brings a more upmarket look and feel than the work-focused GLX variants, upping the standard equipment list with a MITSUBISHI-embossed gloss black grille and chrome front fascia highlights.

GLS buyers also get new 18-inch alloys and 265/60R18 tyres with a full-size alloy spare, load tub-liner, heated mirrors, rear privacy glass, full LED lighting including DRLs, keyless entry/start, unique fabric-seat interior trim, dual-zone climate, auto-dimming frameless rear-view mirror and wireless phone charging.

There’s also a 7.0-inch LCD driver’s digital display and 9.0-inch touchscreen for the premium six-speaker multimedia system including Android Auto, wireless Apple CarPlay and two USB ports.

For an additional $1500, the ‘GLS Leather Option’ brings leather-trimmed seats with silver stitching, heated front seats and power driver’s seat adjustment.

The 2.0-litre four-cylinder diesel with single turbocharger produces a healthy 125kW at 3500rpm and 405Nm of torque between 1750-2500rpm, which exceeds the outputs of 2.4-litre HiLux and 1.9-litre D-Max diesel rivals.

This engine is paired with a six-speed torque converter automatic, which offers the choice of sequential manual-shifting using a small thumb-operated toggle on the side of the shift-lever.

This can be handy when carrying and/or towing heavy loads, particularly in hilly terrain to minimise gear-hunting.

A new 4N16 variant of Mitsubishi’s 4N1 diesel engine family retains its predecessor’s 2.4-litre displacement but adds a second turbocharger. These work in sequence, with the smaller one providing fast response at low rpm and the larger one boosting performance at higher rpm.

The result is 150kW at 3500rpm and 470Nm of peak torque between 1500-2750rpm.

These outputs are 17kW and 40Nm more than the previous Triton and emissions are reduced with the addition of an AdBlue tank.

This engine is paired with an updated six-speed torque converter automatic and (on GLS and GSR) Mitsubishi’s excellent Super Select 4WD-II system with Torsen centre differential.

This still-advanced system offers seven drive modes, including full-time 4x4 which with the centre diff unlocked can be driven on all surfaces including dry sealed roads. With the centre diff locked for off-road use, it offers high and low range 4x4 with a 50:50 drive-split front and rear.

A rear diff-lock can also be engaged in low range.

Ford claims official average combined cycle consumption of 7.8L/100km.

When we stopped to refuel at the end of our 493km test, which included a mix of suburban and highway driving of which about one fifth was carrying a heavy payload, the dash display was claiming 8.5L/100km.

This was very close to our own figure of 9.3, calculated from fuel bowser and trip meter readings, which confirmed thrifty single-digit economy in real-world driving conditions.

So, based on our own figures, the test vehicle should achieve an impressive driving range of around 860km from its big 80-litre tank.

Mitsubishi claims an official combined average consumption of 7.7L/100km and the dash readout was displaying 8.7 at the completion of our 421km test, of which about one quarter was hauling a full payload. Our own figure, calculated from fuel bowser and tripmeter readings, was higher again at 9.7 but within the usual 2-3L/100km discrepancy between official and real-world figures. So, based on our numbers, you could expect a realistic driving range of around 770km from its 75-litre tank.

It’s easy to climb aboard with big assist-handles on the A and B pillars to compensate for the absence of side-steps.

The driving position is comfortable and spacious, with ample manual adjustments available in the seat and steering wheel.

It may be a back-to-basics workhorse but refinements in the latest Ranger generation have not been compromised.

The unladen ride quality is undeniably firm but still commendable, even on bumpy roads, given its leaf-spring rear axle and big payload rating.

The relatively light 4x2 kerb weight ensures brisk acceleration from standing starts, combined with steering feel that arguably remains the class benchmark.

We forklifted 890kg into the tub which with driver (and towing pack) was more than one tonne of payload.

The rear leaf springs compressed 50mm under this weight, but there was no chance of bottoming-out because of the rear suspension design that has long cone-shaped jounce rubbers that engage with the springs early in their compression.

This eliminates the hard thumps at full travel like traditional bump-stops and provide what is effectively a second stage of load support. The result is a smooth ride under maximum loads, regardless of road conditions.

The Ranger has ample performance in busy suburban driving and excels at highway speeds, with low engine, tyre and wind noise highlighting its excellent noise suppression.

It also made light work of hauling this load up our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set climb at 60km/h, self-shifting down to third gear to easily reach the summit with minimal accelerator required.

Engine braking on the way down, in a manually-selected second gear, wasn’t as robust but typical of small displacement turbo-diesels trying to restrain big loads on steep descents.

The only negative was an alert that appeared on the driver’s info display, warning of a ‘front camera malfunction’ that would require servicing.

As a result, we were without pre-collision assist, adaptive cruise control or speed-limiter functions for the remainder of our test run, which fortunately occurred on the final day of our loan.

The ergonomic changes are noticeable when you get behind the wheel, with a more comfortable and supportive seating position and increased cabin width providing a more spacious feel.

The new electric power steering is another highlight, being communicative and nicely weighted at all speeds, while the unique Australian suspension tune results in a more planted and sure-footed feel. The ride quality is also smoother, which is no doubt enhanced by more sprung weight and a longer wheelbase.

The new bi-turbo engine has good response and flexibility, with its 1250rpm-wide peak torque band between 1500-2750rpm providing ample pulling power at lower speeds with a seamless transition to maximum power at 3500rpm.

The six-speed automatic has gearing and shift calibrations that optimise engine performance. It’s also a quiet and efficient highway cruiser, requiring only 1750rpm to maintain 110km/h which is also within its peak torque band.

To test its load-hauling ability, we loaded 890kg into the load tub, which with driver and luggage equalled one tonne of payload that was 75kg below its legal limit.

The 'standard' leaf-spring rear suspension compressed more than 60mm under this weight, leaving a finger-width of static bump-stop clearance which initially seemed inadequate.

However, the rubber bump-stops have central voids that provide more of a cushioning effect at full suspension travel than traditional hard-nosed designs, which minimises thumps over big bumps and ensures a smoother ride.

The Triton displayed sure-footed handling and braking with this near-maximum payload on board. The bi-turbo engine was also on top of the job, with its ‘twin-stage’ turbocharging making light work of city, suburban and highway driving.

It also impressed on our 13 per cent gradient, 2.0km set-climb at 60km/h, self-shifting down to third gear to easily haul this load to the summit. Engine-braking on the way down was not as robust, but in our experience typical of sub-3.0-litre turbo-diesels restraining one tonne payloads on steep descents.

Our only gripe is the ‘Driver Attention Alert’ function. Its prominent detection module mounted on the steering column partly obscures the driver’s view of the lower instrument panel. And its over-sensitivity in determining driver inattention (like wearing sunnies, looking left and right at T-intersections etc) becomes annoying and needs refinement.

It comes with a five-star ANCAP rating achieved in 2024. Passive safety includes driver and front passenger front/side/centre airbags plus driver’s knee and side-curtain airbags. Active safety includes AEB and rear-AEB when reversing, front and rear cross-traffic alerts, tyre pressure and blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping and more. There are ISOFIX child-seat mounts and top-tether restraints on the two outer rear seating positions.

Warranty is five years/unlimited km.

Scheduled servicing is every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first.

Capped-price servicing for the first five scheduled services totals $1911 or an average of $382 per service.

Five years/100,000km standard warranty, or 10 years/200,000km if serviced at Mitsubishi dealers. Servicing every 12 months/15,000km whichever occurs first. Capped-price for 10 scheduled services up to 10 years/150,000km is $6690, or an average of $669 per service.