Browse over 9,000 car reviews
What's the difference?
Few cars have had the sheer staying power of the Suzuki Swift.
Except for a four-year hiatus as the original Ignis from 2001, the Japanese supermini has been a segment mainstay since 1983, winning over consumers worldwide as an inexpensive, economical and reliable yet fun option in the Toyota Yaris class.
In Australia, its impact has been even more profound, providing Holden with its famous “beep-beep” Barina for two early iterations from 1985, while also introducing us to the pocket rocket decades before the Volkswagen Polo GTI, with the Swift GTi of 1986.
Now there’s this – the sixth-gen model in 41 years if you exclude that Ignis – doing what the little Suzuki has always done: offering buyers a great budget alternative. But this time, in this new-electrification era, where precious few attainable choices remain.
Is it any good? Let’s dive straight in.
While we all mumble about the SUV taking over the passenger car world, a quick glance over at Volkswagen proves the traditional hatchback is still a viable train of thought.
Of course, with the original 1970s Golf, VW more or less invented the modern hatch, but even so, its decision to stick with the concept speaks volumes when many other makers are moving to an SUV-only (or, at least, SUV-dominated) stance.
So, any new or even facelifted VW Golf is big news, and an important model that VW can’t afford to have fail.
What we’re not seeing with the VW Golf yet is any form of hybridisation, let alone, full electrification, despite the Golf being available in EV form in Europe for some years now. At which point the question becomes one of whether Volkswagen is giving he Golf concept the best chance of survival. As in, can a conventionally powered, conventionally packaged hatchback still do the business in 2025. I mean, evolution is one thing, but – sticking with the metaphor - extinction has always been a possibility, too.
So, there you have it. A brief look at the new, sixth-gen Swift.
Better where it needs to be, the supermini survivor still remains competitively priced, with loads of new efficiency and safety tech that buyers will appreciate.
But, most of all, the Suzuki still feels, drives and rewards like the old model used to. It just does so with more sophistication.
As inexpensive city cars continue to fade, the new Swift continues 41 years of providing a fun, affordable and dependable solution, in a vibrant and desirable package.
Modern cars tend to be judged on what they cost and what’s included in that price. Of course, that’s car-buying 101, but in the case of something like the new Golf, there’s an almost-intangible that must come into the final reckoning. Both the 1.4-litre models and the Golf GTI have a certain accessibility and ability to satisfy your transport needs and your appreciation of quality at the same time. Not every mainstream car manages this.
The refinement is unquestionable and the dynamics of either Golf variant speak of engineering that is sophisticated beyond the price-tag, certainly when compared with the cars the Golf is destined to sell against. Against that, prices on all but the entry-level car have risen, and even that car has lost some standard equipment. It’s also worth saying that not everybody who buys a new car is going to notice this ethereal notion of quality and sophistication. And if that’s the case, there are other cars out there that will do just as good a job. But if you can appreciate a car with a bit of soul, the Golf is truly a class-leading proposition that also happens to be able to hold its own on most other fronts.
Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with accommodation and meals provided.
At first glance, the new one looks a lot like the old one. Short overhangs, long wheelbase, upright A-pillars, that signature 'floating' roof. This could be nothing else but a Swift.
Obviously, though, every single panel has changed, resulting in a stronger, quieter and more aerodynamic body.
Helping communicate this is a new and very definite crease line added to create a more-pronounced shoulder. The bonnet seems to be more clamshell-like and the nose is squarer, too. Indeed, everything about the overall styling seems to be more upright.
Debate is already raging in some circles. Is the new Swift too fussy? Too conservative? Has it lost the playful boldness of the proceeding version's gently-sculptured sides and hidden rear-door handles? Are the proportions slightly out now? Has the previous design integrity and oneness of vision been diluted? Does the 2017 predecessor look better?
Underneath, the platform is essentially the same, while overall dimensions are largely identical except for a 20mm stretch and 25mm roof lift. Length, width, height and wheelbase numbers 3860mm, 1735mm, 1520mm and 2450mm, respectively.
Happily, the aesthetic changes inside are likely to please rather than perplex, and even delight rather than divide opinion.
As a facelift (and a fairly mild one at that) rather than a new model, the move to Golf 8.5 specification doesn’t represent any major engineering or stylistic shift. But what it does signal is a recognition that the driver interface set-up in the previous version was not without its foibles and faults.
Many owners complained that the touchscreen mechanism for operating many of the car’s functions required two key-strokes, when one would have been the case in a less convoluted system. So, VW has revisited the way humans interact with the car and come up with some genuine improvements.
Now there are quick-access buttons above and below the central info screen as well as physical steering wheel buttons replacing the previous car’s touch buttons which sometimes had a mind of their own.
In terms of styling changes, well, they’re minimal to say the least.
But keen car-watchers will spot the Golf 8.5's new front and rear bumpers, tweaked headlight and tail-light treatment, new alloy wheel designs and an illuminated bonnet badge on everything bar the Style variant.
Oh, and retro design gets a look in this time, too, with the alloys on the GTI bearing a striking resemblance to those on the iconic Golf 5 GTI from the early part of this century and, arguably, the car that gave the Golf concept the shot in the arm that sees it still around today.
From a packaging perspective, the latest Swift carries on from before, and that’s no bad thing. It remains exceptionally roomy as well as practical.
To that end, entry and egress are easy, there’s a sense of spaciousness thanks to deep windows, a high ceiling and lofty seating, while the latter also helps provide an agreeable driving position. Storage and ventilation are provided in abundance.
For many people, the dash redesign reflects a big change in attitude, having finally grown up and away from the previous cheap and cheerful look. Highlights include pleasing seat fabrics, interesting textures and a sense of quality craftspersonship, within a stylish and sweeping design. After 41 years, the Swift has matured gracefully.
It’s also worth pointing out the super-clear analogue instrumentation dials, supported by a digital speedo and configurable trip computer data; actual buttons for the heating and air-conditioning system and – joy of joys – a handbrake lever.
Plus, if you want to turn off the various beeps from the driver-assist systems, physical buttons are but a simple press away. No distracting sub-menu searches within fiddly touchscreens here, thanks.
Except if you want to change the volume because you’ll need to prod the screen after all. The knob is always the better option, Suzuki.
What else? The rear bench area is a little plain but surprisingly roomy for this class of light car. Probably more so than a Corolla provided back in the early 2000s, with a decent level of cushy support for two people or three at a squeeze.
Given the extra specification, even the cheapest grade is all the Swift you’ll need. A sign of a democratic car.
But keep in mind the base variant no longer comes with a driver’s seat adjuster, passenger vanity mirror and multiple USB ports found in the Plus and GLX versions, while it is alone with a clammy plastic rather than leather-sheathed steering wheel rim.
At least cargo capacity edges up, by 23 litres to 265L (VDA), and that’s just under the luggage cover, thanks to some clever repackaging of a now-lower boot floor and internal tailgate panels. Drop the rear backrests and that expands to 569L.
Note, however, that for the Swift to achieve its sensationally low kerb weight that starts from just 919kg (up around 50kg), it now uses a fiddly and frankly-inadequate tyre repair kit. Thankfully, Suzuki offers that space-saver spare, at extra cost (and mass) of course.
Still, keeping those kilos low pays high dividends when it comes to performance and economy.
Up front, the Golf is all sensible and grown up. In fact, there’s a sniff of European boardroom simplicity and elegance and none of the gimmickry some of its competitors throw at their products in the name of looking racy or plush. Faux metallic finishes or air vents that look like jet engines? You won’t find them here. That said, if you’re looking for a bit of noise and bling, the cabin might just seem a little austere. At first glance, anyway.
Scratch a bit deeper and the practicality starts to shine through. Okay, so the new quick access buttons seem a bit scattered, but we won’t class that as a criticism, because the alternative where those same functions are buried under multiple menus on a touchscreen is vastly less appealing and ergonomically 'right'.
The centre console is home to a pair of cupholders and a 12-volt output socket, and there is a pair of USB charging ports tucked under the ledge of the lower part of the dashboard. The sun visors each feature a lit vanity mirror and the lower doors house deep and large pockets capable of holding a full-sized bottle.
Back in the rear seat, there’s decent foot room and very generous headroom, but knee-room might be a bit limited if the person directly in front is tall. In fact, any front-seater getting on for 180cm will be asked to move their chair forward by any person of roughly similar stance attempting to sit in the back. But the rear seat itself is good, although, like so many cars, the rear-centre position is last place in the comfort stakes.
A fold-down armrest is available if the fifth (centre) seat is not in use, and it also hides a pair of cupholders. Assuming those knees allow, there are three pockets in the back of each front seat as well as a good sized door pocket on each side. The rear seat also includes centre air vents, reading lights and a pair of USB charge-points.
With the rear seat in place, VW claims a luggage capacity of 374 litres with a reasonable loading lip height of 675mm. Fold the rear seat down and there’s a huge space for cargo, but if you still need one rear seat, the backrest is split 60/40 and also includes a ski-port, allowing access to the luggage from the rear seat. The luggage area also houses three top-tether restraint fixing points and there’s a space-save spare tyre under the floor. Four tie-down points are also located in each corner of the cargo area.
So. Why are there so few affordable city-sized superminis like the Swift?
Just 10 years ago, the Swift had at least 25 rivals under $25,000. Today that’s phonetically as well as literally down "t(w)o" "three" – namely, the ageing but still-surprisingly-spry Mazda2 and intriguing all-new MG 3, as well as Australia’s sole sub-$20K new car, Kia's darling Picanto.
Many of the Class of 2014 have since morphed into pint-sized crossover hatchbacks like Suzuki’s soon-to-be-discontinued Ignis, the Hyundai Venue and Kia Stonic. And if you must, there are also the cheerless MG ZS and ancient Mitsubishi ASX biggish-small SUVs – but they’re cheapo for a reason.
Unlike the latest Swift... which, from $24,490 drive-away, is more than reasonably cheap, since it introduces some electrification tech across the whole range, while still being around the same price as the old base GL.
This now makes the new Swift Australia’s cheapest 'hybrid'.
Granted, despite wearing the Hybrid badge on every grade, it’s just a mild hybrid system, but one that provides extra electrification to usefully boost performance and economy for the all-new powertrain and revised transmissions. More on all that later.
What else? The base Swift at last gains LED lights, telescopic as well as tilt steering adjustment and important driver-assist safety like Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), along with lane-support systems, adaptive cruise control and rear parking sensors.
Also included now are keyless entry/start, a 9.0-inch touchscreen as part of a new multimedia set-up, wireless for Apple CarPlay (but not for the Android Auto), a digital radio, heated mirrors, traffic sign recognition, auto high beams and an alarm.
And there's more. The entry-level Swift Hybrid is also class unique in offering a manual gearbox. Good on you, Suzuki.
Not for you? Don't worry, because the Hybrid auto that is expected to be the bestseller starts from $26,990, drive-away. For the record, that’s only about $1000 more than the equivalent old version but with all that extra gear to boot.
But, beware, the base-model Hybrid alone lacks a few items that may or may not have been standard in the outgoing Swift, such as a driver’s seat-height adjuster, leather-wrapped steering wheel, privacy glass, alloy wheels, front passenger vanity mirror, front-seat map pockets, multiple USB charging outlets and a spare wheel (though you can pay extra for one as the wheel-well remains).
All of the above, except the missing spare, are included in the new Hybrid Plus auto grade, from $28,490 drive-away, along with heated front seats and additional driver-assist tech like a blind-spot monitor. We’ll get into more detail in the Safety section below.
Finally, there’s the Hybrid GLX auto, with its wireless phone charger, folding exterior mirrors, steering wheel paddle shifters, climate control, glossy alloys and more from $29,490, drive-away.
Sadly, the terrific old GLX 'BoosterJet' three-cylinder turbo is no more, and there might not even be a new Swift Sport to continue the GTi hot-hatch legacy.
Still, Suzuki’s managed to keep the entire range under $30K drive-away, despite big changes inside and out. Let’s check those out.
Volkswagen has done a bit of fiddling with the Golf line-up’s pricing, including a price drop for the entry-level car. Typically, though, there’s a catch and the lower price also means less equipment. So here’s how it all pans out:
The facelifted Golf Life is now $500 cheaper but loses tri-zone climate-control (for single-zone) integrated sat-nav (you now need to use your phone) and the ambient interior lighting is gone. But you still get auto headlights, a slightly-larger-than-before 10.4 inch info-screen, a digital instrument display, wireless charging, single-zone climate, 17-inch alloys, digital radio, keyless entry, a reversing camera and a leather-trimmed steering wheel. Call it $38,690, before on-roads costs.
The next step up is a new variant called Style which most closely approximates the Highline trim level in previous Golf line-ups. It adds 18-inch alloys, a 12.9 inch info screen, LED headlights, embedded sat-nav, ambient lighting, a 14-way power adjustable driver’s seat with memory function, tinted glass and some splashes of exterior chrome. That version lands at $43,690, before on-roads.
Next on the ladder is the R-Line which gets a specific 18-inch rim, selectable drive modes, adaptive steering borrowed from the GTI, leather trim and heated and ventilated sports seats. It’s now $47,990, BOC, which is a fair old hike of $5700 over the outgoing R-Line.
The highest spec variant of the Golf unveiled at the recent launch (and the Golf R will be dealt with with its own launch, says VW) is the new GTI which now costs $58,990, before on-road costs, or $2900 more than the previous GTI.
But that’s justified by more power this time around, and over and above the R-Line, the GTI adds its own engine, specific transmission, adaptive suspension, 19-inch alloys, a raft of GTI styling items and trim pieces, fog lights, tartan cloth trim and an expanded version of the car’s self-parking functionality. Oh, and while metallic paint is a no-cost option on the GTI, 'Premium Metallic Paint' (VW’s own description) whatever that is, is not. It’s a $300 ask on the GTI.
Volkswagen has long been keen on optional packages to give its cars a bit more appeal, and this time around is no different. So, buyers of either the Life, Style or R-Line can tick the box on a panoramic sunroof for $1900 or the $2000 'Sound and Vision' package that includes an upgraded Harman Kardon premium sound system, head-up display and a 360-degree view camera system.
The GTI, meanwhile, can accept those options at the same price, but is also available with a $3900 interior package that brings Vienna leather upholstery, a power-adjustable driver’s seat and heated and ventilated front seats.
If there’s one area where Suzuki shines, that’s in making sweet little engines, and the new, chain-driven, 1197cc 1.2-litre mild hybrid three-cylinder petrol unit is no exception.
Now, on paper, 61kW at 5700rpm and 112Nm at 4500rpm may seem slightly lacking. A Mazda2 manages to make nearly 35 and 30 per cent more power and torque, respectively.
But the Swift's new 'ISG' integrated starter/generator/electric motor unit delivers an additional 2.3kW and 60Nm.
Combined with the hatchback's comparative lightness, it makes for a sufficient power-to-weight ratio of between 63 and 66kW per tonne.
Or, in other words, it provides some welcome extra low-down muscle.
Drive is naturally sent to the front wheels, via either a light-yet-positive shifting five-speed manual gearbox, or new CVT auto. Both have been heavily revised in their new roles serving the mild-hybrid powertrain.
All Golfs apart from the GTI and R (so that’s the Life, Style and R-Line, then) get the familiar 1.4-litre turbocharged four-cylinder engine which makes 110kW of power and 250Nm of torque. It’s a well known unit that provides adequate performance and better than average levels of refinement and smoothness. Based on previous experience, it’s actually more engaging than those bald numbers suggest.
In either case, it drives through an eight-speed conventional automatic transmission driving the front wheels. That word 'conventional' is important, too, and distinguishes the unit from the allegedly sportier (and previously troublesome) dry-clutch dual-clutch transmission.
The GTI, of course, offers much more performance and does so with the latest version of the perhaps the even more familiar 2.0-litre turbocharged four-cylinder. This time, however, it’s been tuned up to provide more power (195kW this time) and the seven-speed (wet) dual-clutch transmission also makes a return. There’s no manual gearbox option and the GTI remains front-wheel drive as one of its major differentiators from the all-wheel drive Golf R.
But don’t go thinking front-wheel-drive plus big power and torque equals an unruly drive. Because the GTI has a pretty sophisticated front differential which, based on past experience, does a good job of sending torque to the wheel that can best handle it, as well as helping the car corner more effectively. Plenty of people have driven more recent Golf GTIs and wondered aloud if the all-wheel drive of the Golf R is really necessary.
Part of that is the variable steering assistance and ratio of the GTI that can lighten up the steering for low-speed moves, and then add weight for high-speed stability. The rest of the secret lies in the electronically operation of the diff that allows it to lock and unlock quickly and effectively depending on the grip available and the torque being fed through it at the time. Like the adaptive dampers, VW claims the differential has been tweaked and improved over the Golf GTI 8.0 which also featured this tech.
Volkswagen also claims an electronic differential for the Life, Style and R-Line models, but in reality (and while it does offer advantages) it’s a braking-based system that can brake individual front wheels to maintain traction, rather than an actual limited-slip differential.
The latest Swift’s maturity does not end with its suave cabin presentation.
Prioritising high economy and subsequently low pollution, this Euro 6d-rated three-pot hybrid powertrain promises an astonishing combined fuel-consumption average of just 3.8 litres per 100km for the manual, and slightly more for the CVT at 4.0L/100km.
The results are 78 and 80 grams per kilometre of carbon dioxide emissions, respectively, along with around 970km between refills of the meagre 37L fuel tank.
These facts somewhat ease the pain of the need for more-expensive 95 RON premium unleaded petrol instead of the regular brew. High-tech solutions do require superior fuel, after all.
With just 70km on our ultra-tight test car’s odometer, the trip computer’s 6.7L readout is likely no indicator of the frugality we’re expecting to come.
So, how are such low consumption figures attainable? Along with better aerodynamics and a low kerb weight, the latest Swift Hybrid’s ISG hybrid unit generates supplementary electricity under acceleration, to ease the engine’s reliance on petrol.
It also recharges the 12-volt lithium-ion battery that lives beneath the front passenger-seat floor off-throttle via regenerative braking.
Note that the Suzuki never drives purely on electricity.
Without the extra weight of an SUV, it’s no surprise to learn the new Golf is a fuel sipper. The 1.4-litre variants all claim an official combined cycle (urban/extra-urban) fuel consumption number of 6.3 litres per 100km. And thanks to the efficiency of the entire platform, you’ll probably get closer to that in the real world than a lot of cars do to their own official number. Take it as read that you’ll be comfortably into the sixes on a highway cruise and perhaps even knocking on the door of a five.
And that’s just as well, because the VW requires 95-octane fuel which (depending on the price of diesel on the day) is about the second most expensive per-litre brew you’ll find at the bowser.
Based on the 50-litre tank fitted, the range of the 1.4-litre Golf should be comfortably beyond 700km.
The extra power of the GTI, of course, as well as the greater capacity, dictates that it will use more fuel. And it does with a government number of 7.2 litres per 100km. But the other thing to consider is that you’ll almost certainly drive it harder, too, at which point it can start to use even more fuel.
That said, a spirited strop on an alpine road during the launch drive netted a fuel number in the mid-10s, while our overall score after a long day on the road equalled 8.5 litres per 100km.
So it’s hardly a greedy car given the performance on tap. Again, 95-octane ULP is the order of the day. And that same 50-litre tank should be good for at least 600km between visits to the servo.
No Swift since 2004’s new-millennium redesign has been anything less than fun to punt around. A focus on driving pleasure and superior dynamics has helped make each version a cut-above most rivals.
Losing the smooth old 1.2-litre four-cylinder engine in the name of low consumption and emissions is a noble move. But how does this translate out in the real world, especially with a Swift fan behind the wheel?
It's mostly great, actually.
Losing a cylinder results in a slightly less creamy power delivery, especially as it’s accompanied by a distinctive three-cylinder exhaust-note thrum. But that’s still in keeping with the Swift’s endearingly sporty character.
Better still, even with all the examples we tested showing barely more than delivery mileage on the odometer, there seems to be more than enough grunt to please driving enthusiasts.
While not wanting to tax engines that weren’t even run-in yet, the charming revvy eagerness and instant throttle response remains, along with a discernible extra kick when accelerating away from standstill.
Even being so new, our Swifts proved to be lively, lusty and surprisingly rapid performers. We can’t wait to test run-in examples!
The five-speed manual is deliciously well-oiled and precise, immersing the driver into the Swift experience on another level compared to the CVT auto, which still manages to impress by responding quickly and effortlessly, without feeling laggy or droney. A lot like the old version.
Suzuki is making a lot of noise over how agile yet comfortable the newcomer’s handling and ride qualities are, as a result of improved rigidity and noise-dampening measures.
The Swift’s MacPherson-style front struts and torsion beam rear suspension systems have been revised with stronger and quieter mounts for better performance, while the electric steering has been retuned for greater feel and linearity.
The result? Even our limited time behind the wheel revealed tactile and precise steering, composed handling and extraordinary isolation from the road below for a car barely weighing 950kg (at most).
Combined with the nuanced driver-assist safety tech that rarely interrupted the fun, the latest Swift is a cheerfully animated, nimble and rewarding experience... and one that stands out all the more for evolving while so many other like-minded rivals like the Ford Fiesta have sadly fallen away.
Bravo, Suzuki. Generation Number Six remains the enthusiast driver’s choice, and a hybrid bargain to boot.
The Golf has, for at least a decade or more, been at the absolute top of the small-hatchback tree when it comes to driving sophistication. And whatever else you think about the product, a lack of refinement and driver involvement has not been missing from the formula.
This time around, VW claims to have tweaked the suspension rates slightly for the Life, Style and R-Line and it’s hard to argue with the result. Just as all Golfs for the last couple of decades have, the 8.5, even in its simplest specification, rides and corners with a combination of balance and ride quality that few small cars - and pretty much no mainstream hatchback - under $50,000 can match.
It sounds like a big statement, but the first few kilometres will convince you this is how all good cars should steer and handle bumps and lumps. There’s no sense that the Golf will ever run out of suspension travel, nor any suggestion it’s anything other than an entertaining and engaging thing to drive.
The same goes for the engine. Peak power of 110kW mightn’t sound like a whole lot, but the torque is always where you need it and the zesty, zingy feel of the little engine makes you want to work it even harder; something it absolutely loves.
While the eight-speed automatic suggests a slightly lazier experience than a dual-clutch, this time around, the differences in shift speed and smoothness between the two types of trasmission are all but eliminated. Not only that, the Golf’s conventional automatic now obeys the paddle-shifter's commands with a degree of relentless faithfulness that makes you think it’s a dual-clutch after all.
Just as the more mainstream models have been class leaders dynamically, so too has the Golf GTI shown the way to the rest of the hot-hatch pack. This time around, though, there’s a sense it’s a more serious performance car than ever, and that has consequences.
While previous GTIs have felt immediately rewarding and flattering to pretty much any driver, this time, the GTI’s performance envelope has been stretched to the point where it now kind of needs to be driven faster than ever to offer those rewards.
It’s certainly not unfriendly at low speeds, nor an uncommunicative car by any means, rather the limit is now so sky-high, it seems a shame not to tap into it. Which means you need the right time and the right place to most enjoy what the car has to offer.
But let’s not ignore the fact the GTI has so much poise, grip and general ability up its sleeve that it will make any driver look like a superstar, and a good driver look like Oscar Piastri. The paddle-shifters are foolproof, the power delivery exacting and relentless and the steering and handling designed to never let you get in over your head. Which is not to say the GTI is uncrashable, but it has more ability than most drivers will have bravery.
Even the suspension, which is now firmer than ever, is far from too stiff or too harsh.
In 'Comfort', only big lateral thumps will get your attention, but even in 'Sport' mode, the shift in ride firmness is subtle enough to make either mode viable on even fairly lumpy roads.
And if that brilliant front end doesn’t make you question the need for the AWD Golf R, it should.
The latest, sixth-generation Swift has yet to be crash-tested by ANCAP.
Even the base Hybrid now includes driver-assist safety like AEB that includes night and day pedestrian and cyclist detection as standard, along with lane-departure warning, lane-keep assist, 'Weaving Alert' (a driver-drowsiness warning prompt), rear parking sensors, traffic-sign recognition, a reverse camera, automatic high beams and adaptive cruise control.
You’ll need to go Hybrid Plus for rear-cross traffic alert and blind-spot warning tech, though.
Note that Suzuki does not supply information about the AEB and other driver-assist tech’s operating parameters.
Also fitted are six airbags (dual front, dual front side and curtain), electronic stability control, anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution and brake-assist.
The rear seats also contain a trio of child-seat tether anchorages, as well as an outboard pair of ISOFIX attachments.
The Golf 8 (of which this car is a mild facelift) was tested according to Euro NCAP test standards back in 2019 where it scored the full five stars for safety. It hasn’t been tested locally, nor is it likely to be. Compared with the car that scored five stars in 2019, this new version is probably even safer, thanks to the inclusion since then of a ninth air bag; a centre one for the front seats to prevent head clashes in a side impact crash.
Driver aids include autonomous emergency braking that includes collision warning and can identify pedestrians. There’s also blind-spot monitoring and lane keeping assistance, although I found the lane keeping function a little insistent at times. And you need to dive through a couple of menus to turn it off, and you need to do that every time you fire the car up. Blame the NCAP test protocols.
The Golf in any trim level also gets adaptive cruise-control, park-assist, a driver-attention monitoring system, front and rear parking sensors and a reversing camera. What’s missing? A tyre-pressure monitoring system would be nice.
Suzuki offers an industry-average five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty and roadside assistance.
Service intervals are every 12 months or 15,000km, while basic capped-price servicing is available, with the website showing pricing for the first five years and 100,000km averaging $391 per workshop visit.
The facelifted Golf carries VW Australia’s five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty. Servicing intervals are every 15,000km or 12 months which ever comes first and there will be capped price servicing, but the actual cost had not been revealed to us as we published this review.
But for reference, the previous Golf could be had with capped price servicing at around $2100 for the first five years which is not exactly the cheapest out there when compared with its logical rivals.
It also pays to remember that even though the engines are both quite efficient, you will need to stump up for the more expensive 95-octane stuff every time you fill up.