Volkswagen ID.4 vs Volvo C40

What's the difference?

It might have been accidental good fortune that Volkswagen Australia has had to wait so long for the ID.4 because this version is by far the best yet.

It’s familiar but new to drive, tidily styled, with the refinement and finish you expect from such a storied automaker. 

The brand has also done an admirable job of pricing and specifying this electric mid-sizer just right so it should definitely be on your list of considerations, even with such a strong field of competition in 2025.

Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.

The C40 becomes a compelling option in the electrified small SUV space, offering a premium look and feel, great range and tech inclusions at the price, as well as awesome on-road dynamics.

Its main downsides are the rear seat, which is compromised by its platform and design-led roofline, and the overwhelming power and added traction of the dual-motor makes the single motor less attractive on the value front.

Still, regardless of variant chosen, the C40 looks to offer a stand-out balance of price, range, and performance, against its traditional rivals and newcomers alike.

When it launched the ID.4 was a significant departure from the more angular styling of VWs at the time, particularly the likes of the boxy Tiguan combustion equivalent.

Now with a few years to digest the design and how it compares to its rivals, it seems a little conservative.

This is perhaps a deliberate move from VW as it attempts to avoid some of the more wild and unconventional electric vehicle designs worn by newer players in this space, appealing to both a more traditional VW buyer and others that want to be a little less shouty about their EV.

While it plays the design game more safely than some rivals, I also think it has a resolved nature to it which helps to set it apart. The dance of coloured styling elements with a tri-tone finish of silver and black highlights is nicely executed, as are the white-tinged VW badges which help set it apart from the rest of the brand’s range.

Inside, VW has followed a similar trend to many other vehicles in this space, with a wide-open cabin and a dashboard dominated by a large central touchscreen. Unlike some new-age rivals in this space, VW’s 12.9-inch panel isn’t as all-consuming as some fifteen-plus-inch units, which lends the cabin a slightly more traditional feel for better or worse.

It’s also good to see the brand continue to offer a digital instrument panel perched atop the steering column, although it’s minimalist in terms of what it displays, especially compared to the cluster in this car’s more premium Audi Q4 e-tron relation.

The seats look and feel good, and while the dash is largely made of hard-finish plastics, there's a clever smattering of soft-touch finishes in the doors and atop the dash, in most of the places you’re likely to touch.

The ID.4 feels a bit more like a car rather than a tech product, which I think some buyers will appreciate.

Volvo has become a brand with a distinctive and consistent design language which embodies the kind of beautiful minimalism normally associated with Scandinavian brands.

I have always liked how Volvo says more with less design elements, with only gentle touches of chrome or gloss black, and a lack of over-the-top sporty pieces avoiding the temptation to over-sell the sporty potential of the brand’s range.

The C40 takes the small SUV formula, well established by its XC40 relation, and gets a bit weird and experimental. It’s slightly lower and has a more coupe-styled rear, with a strongly raked rear window giving it a sportier and more aggressive look than the rest of Volvo’s SUV range.

The styling is sold by an angular spoiler piece running atop the boot, and the rear light clusters have gone all minimalist, constructed of individual pieces rather than a single transparent housing, and they give a nod to the C30 hatchback which this car is the spiritual successor to, by name and nature.

The interior offers up no surprises, sticking to the formula Volvo has established across all of its current models. An effortlessly premium space with, again, a minimalistic dash dominated by the portrait touchscreen, the C40’s premium nature is confirmed by its finely patterned inlays, simple chrome pieces, and abundance of soft-touch surfaces.

The big upright vent fittings with clever rhomboid patterns on their adjustment dials are always a highlight piece of modern Volvos, and the pattern work is continued on the central volume adjust dial and even on the little rotating pieces of the light and wiper stalks. Clever.

Even the software is paired back on the multimedia suite and digital dashboard, with easy to use shortcuts and simple menus which suit the car.

Volvo might turn off some buyers with the more unconventional shape of the C40. But for those looking for a more traditional SUV it also offers the XC40 in the same two variants, and the Polestar 2 caters to those not looking for an SUV at all.

VW has taken the opportunity with the ID.4 and its MEB platform to re-think cabin practicality. In the cockpit this means the standard raised console we usually see in a lot of mid-sizers has been replaced with a more modular floating console with some neat touches.

There's also a wide and spacious feel to the cabin thanks to the removal of structural elements usually reserved in combustion vehicles for things like the transmission or driveline tunnel.

The result is a big and airy cabin, reinforced by the big panoramic roof and more upright seating position.

Because there’s no centre console box, the front chairs also have drop-down armrests, which combine nicely with their generous side bolstering and padding to make for an armchair-like feel for front occupants. Lovely.

The touchscreen looks good and operates largely without any kind of lag, plus the layout is reasonable to work with. The main annoyance is using the convenient shortcut functions across the top of the screen for the settings menu or phone mirroring. These touch elements are quite small, forcing you to take your eyes off the road for a moment to interact with them. The same story goes for the touch-based sliders used for volume and climate controls. It’s simply never as good as physical buttons, and again, distracting to use on the move.

The console has impressive modularity. Up front there’s a tray which can either be fitted with removable dividers for a range of configurations, or you can slot a dual bottle-holder piece in there. This can be swapped into the lower section of the console, which also hides a cut-out for a wireless charger and two USB-C ports, and this lower area also has a sliding cover to keep everything tidy.

Meanwhile the back seat offers a spacious layout. At 182cm tall I have plenty of airspace for my knees behind my own driving position, and the width of the cabin is especially evident, with the centre seat position seemingly capable of accommodating a full-size adult if necessary. 

They’ll also have somewhere to put their feet thanks to the flat floor, with the only limiting dimension being headroom. If you are taller than me you might be touching the roof, which dips down a little in the back to accommodate the rolling blind for the panoramic sunroof. At least it has one of these, unlike many other mid-size EVs.

The soft trims in the doors continue, but perhaps the best thing about the rear seats is the built-in strong contouring which gives the outboard positions a good level of comfort and genuine side bolstering.

While rear passengers benefit from a rare third climate zone, the adjustable vents and touch panel for this is located almost on the floor, making it hard to reach when you’re strapped in. It’s the same story for the dual USB-C charging ports.

For storage there’s large bottle holders in each door, three more in a drop-down armrest, as well as phone-sized pockets and bigger pockets on the backs of the front seats. Behind the drop-down armrest there’s a ski-port. Very Euro.

The boot measures 543 litres which seems about right for this segment. It comes with space under the floor for the storage of charging cables (of which, VW throws in both a wall socket version and a Type 2 to Type 2 cable for public charging) and an elastic net which is an underrated feature for stopping objects moving around while you’re driving. Like many other mid-size electric cars, there’s no spare wheel, just an inflator kit.

The ID.4 has no room left in its design for a frunk, which is an arguably gimmicky feature that many rivals have, although I must say there is the odd occasion where I have found them useful.

The C40 is essentially a XC40 with a cropped down roofline, and there are some obvious downsides which this new shape brings.

The front seat throws no surprises, though, offering plenty of room for two adults with a welcome level of adjustability for the seat and wheel. The seats could be more comfortable, though, with a notable lack of padding in the base compared to some luxury (or even non-luxury) rivals. 

I’m a fan of the fabric trim which comes on both grades, bucking the trend of needing to have leather or leather-like trim for a car to feel ‘premium’.

The ample window space up front, including the massive glass roof helps the C40’s cabin feel spacious, but the view out the rear with its aggressive design is all but a very limited letterbox aspect, particularly if the rear seat headrests are in the upright position. 

While some controls are exclusively via touch interface, there is a physical volume dial, and shortcut buttons for the defogger functions. 

Temperature is controlled by touch, however, and the detail settings have some smaller toggle adjustments. Tricky to jab at when you’re on the move.

The digital dash is refreshingly simple, but minimally adjustable, with the choice of either a nifty navigation screen, a blank screen, or trip details being the only options.

Cabin storage is good but not stellar. There are bottle holders and big pockets in the doors, a set of two cupholders in the centre (beats the Polestar 2’s single cupholder), a small tray with a wireless charger under the multimedia screen, and a smallish console armrest box.

The rear seat is where the real problem exists. Unlike the XC40, the C40’s cropped roofline means my head was hard up against the roof (I’m 182cm tall). 

I did have decent knee room behind my own seating position, however the seat comfort in the back still isn’t as good as some rivals. 

The middle position is also compromised, thanks to the raised centre floor piece the C40’s platform needs to facilitate all-wheel drive in its combustion relations.

A bottle holder appears in each door pocket, and in a rare inclusion, there are heated outboard rear seats, adjustable air vents, and USB-C charging ports.

The boot has a quoted capacity of 413 litres with the rear seats up. The floor is comparatively high suggesting a smallish space when loaded with luggage cases, for instance. Stay tuned for a follow-up review so we can see how well it holds our three-piece demo set.

The floor itself has an adjustable, pop-up divider and multiple luggage hooks, making it quite versatile, and there is a cavity beneath which can hold your charging cables as well as the inflator kit in place of a spare wheel.

When it comes to electric vehicles, it’s impossible to consider price alone, as you also have to consider driving range, and the C40 manages to impress on both fronts.

Its refreshingly simplified range consists of just two highly-specified variants, a single motor which starts from $74,990, offering a 434km driving range, or a dual motor starting from $82,490 which offers a 420km driving range.

There’s much more devil in the detail, but to set the scene there are now quite a few direct rivals in this price-bracket, including everything from the Tesla Model Y (from $72,300), Mercedes-Benz EQA (from $78,513), Polestar 2 (from $63,900) and even the Kia Niro which is similarly sized and specified (from $65,300).

Interestingly, the C40 is closely related to the Polestar 2, but has a much higher base starting price. Volvo says this is because it carries a higher standard specification, and offers the C40 without option packs.

Standard gear on the base single motor C40 includes 19-inch alloy wheels, a 9.0-inch portrait multimedia touchscreen (running a Google-based always-online software suite), LED headlights, dual-zone climate control, a fixed panoramic sunroof, electrically adjustable front seats, heated seats for the front two and outboard rear seats, a powered tailgate, as well as keyless entry with touch-free ignition.

Interestingly, Volvo also told us some 90 per cent of customer interest so far has been for the more expensive dual-motor variant, which is particularly impressive for doubling the power output while adding 20-inch alloy wheels, a 360-degree parking suite, premium Harmon Kardon audio, and an alternate interior trim.

Both variants score safety equipment and items which are otherwise part of expensive option packs in the Polestar 2 range. We’ll take a look at the full safety gear later in this review.

Overall, the C40 impresses on the premium car value front compared to rivals, bolstered by solid range and impressive performance.

The version of the ID.4 we’re finally receiving in Australia has major upgrades to its motor and battery. Rather than the lacklustre 125kW/310Nm of the original version, this new one puts out a much more impressive 210kW/540Nm.

The ID.4 Pro is rear-wheel drive for efficiency and packaging reasons, although the dual-motor ID.4 GTX will arrive before the end of 2024 for those looking for the additional power and handling boost this version will offer.

Great news here, the C40 can be chosen with two powerful layouts, either a front-wheel drive 170kW/330Nm set-up, or a dual-motor all-wheel drive arrangement, able to make use of nearly double the power at 300kW/660Nm. The dual-motor is capable of sprinting from 0-100km/h in just 4.7 seconds.

The front-drive is backed by a 69kWh battery allowing it a 434km range, while the dual motor ups the battery size to 78kWh to allow a 420km driving range.

The headline number you’re searching for here is 544km. This is the WLTP driving range for the ID.4 Pro, and it’s plenty for both daily commuting or even intercity trips.

It compares well to many of its rivals, thanks to an upsized 77kWh battery pack, with more sustain (at least on paper) compared to the BYD Sealion 7 and Tesla Model Y RWD and it’s nearly on par, but a few kilometres short, of the Tesla Model Y Long Range and Kia EV5 Air Long Range.

Charging has also been significantly upgraded. On a DC pylon it can charge at a maximum rate of 175kW for a 10 to 80 per cent charge time in 22 minutes, conditions allowing.

Meanwhile an 11kW max speed on an AC charger should see it charge up from 10 per cent to full in around six hours.

While these specs are good, the ID.4 doesn’t currently offer vehicle-to-load technology or vehicle-to-grid capability, which is a bit of a shame now this tech is becoming more common.

Surprisingly, energy consumption is quite high for both C40 variants. The single motor is the more efficient of the two, consuming 16.8kWh/100km on the more lenient ADR testing schedule, while the dual motor officially consumes 22.2kWh/100km to the same standard. I saw around 23kWh/100km overall in my short test of the dual-motor variant.

Energy consumption could be better for both, as I have achieved more consistently impressive results particularly from Hyundai and Kia electric cars.

Where the C40 is more impressive though is its charging specs, which are exactly where they need to be for a car this size. On a rapid DC charger, the C40 can charge at a rate of 150kW meaning a 10 - 80 percent charge in 40 minutes for the dual motor, or 32 minutes for the single motor.

On the slower AC standard, the C40 charges at a rate of 11kW. Expect a 10 - 80 percent charge time of around five or six hours on this standard. 

The C40 uses a European-standard Type 2 CCS charging port, although it misses out on the handy two-way charging feature offered by some rivals.

The ID.4 may be a dedicated electric car, but it still has so many of the characteristics that make VWs great to drive, although it’s a distinct experience from what a Tiguan buyer may be used to.

It starts with the excellent touchpoints, visibility and adjustability for the driver. 

The steering still has the same fine balance of feedback and speed VWs are known for, granting the ID.4 an instantly pleasing handling feel. On top of this, it is distinct from a lot of EVs in this class in that attention has been paid to ride quality.

The Pro sits on EV tyres with a sensible amount of sidewall, which helps to soften the ride, but the suspension itself is also remarkably merciful over the sorts of bumps and imperfections common on Australian roads.

It’s certainly one of the more comfortable EVs I’ve driven, but because of this it also proved to be prone to some boatiness when upset mid-corner, as the weight of the batteries become evident.

Thankfully, this can be tamed by tightening up the suspension response via either the drive modes, or manual override in the settings screen, which is something many rivals don’t have. While the firmest setting can be a little hard, it’s nice you can tailor the experience to the road, not being stuck with a too hard tune (see: Tesla Model Y) or a too soft tune (see: Leapmotor C10), with all ride settings landing somewhere between.

While the ID.4’s power figures and straight-line performance look good on paper, it doesn’t feel as violently rapid as some EVs in this class. Don’t expect the breakneck accelerator response present in the Model Y, even in sport mode, with VW choosing to imbue the ID.4 with a sensible, if a little tame, roll-on for its electric motor.

It makes it difficult to accidentally break traction, and it gives the car an overall more predictable feel, but don’t expect to be able to scare your friends in the same way a Tesla can.

It’s also quite a different experience compared to a Tiguan. While the combustion SUV feels more like a giant hatchback with cat-like reflexes and sharp responsiveness from the front-end, the ID.4 has a more leisurely and luxurious feel, owing to its additional weight and rear-wheel-drive layout.

It might not be a corner carver in the same sense as the Tiguan, but it’s a better country road and freeway tourer. Not necessarily worse, just different.

For what it’s worth, the ID.4 is not a particularly exciting car to drive, but it is refined, well tuned, and flexible to a range of scenarios, which can’t be said for all of its rivals.

If you’ve driven any kind of XC40 or even a Polestar 2 before, the C40 will offer no surprises. It’s pretty much exactly the same from behind the wheel with a few subtle tweaks.

This is a very good thing. The C40 is quiet, easy to drive, and its electric motor and regen system offer a smooth single-pedal experience.

It is also alarmingly, overwhelmingly, rapid. While its massive set of batteries under the floor make it feel heavy off the line in stop-start traffic, sticking your boot into the accelerator will remove any doubt, particularly in the dual-motor variant, that this Volvo means business.

The dual-motor also has an incredible torque-vectoring system, making it extremely difficult to elicit so much as a squeak from its tyres. It also feels as though torque is distributed quite evenly between its two driven axles, making it feel neither prone to over- or understeer.

This has the effect of making the C40 feel somewhat indestructible in the corners, with absurd levels of grip. 

The same feeling is present in top-spec versions of the Polestar 2, only the feeling of ever-present weight is more noticeable in the higher-riding C40, which can make it unsettling to take corners at the kinds of speeds it is capable of.

The steering tune is interesting. Volvo offers two software-controlled modes, either heavy or standard, and the standard mode is heavy enough. 

Despite its electrical assistance, the wheel does continue to offer some organic feedback, making the C40 a pleasure to steer on countryside roads.

The ride is also surprisingly good, despite massive wheel options. I was impressed how easily the C40 handled most bumps and undulations, communicating little to the cabin. 

The ride can approach its limits with such big wheels and the weight of its batteries, generally these are communicated via unsettling thuds from underneath the car. Regular undulations at higher speeds also had the C40 bouncing around a little.

On the whole, though, the cabin is kept relatively insulated and serene, adding an element of total confidence, similar to that offered by Teslas, whilst offering better ride quality with a softer edge. At higher speed, at least on the 20-inch wheels, road noise does pick up, however.

In terms of electric driving, there is a single adjustable setting for regen. The car either offers a full single pedal mode with maximum regenerative braking to bring the car to a halt with the motor alone, or a ‘standard’ mode which tones the regen down and offers it blended in via the brake pedal. 

Single pedal mode is more efficient. I suggest you stick to it if you want to make the most of this car’s efficiency.

I was surprised to have so few complaints about the C40’s drive experience. This is a balanced and capable EV which is yet another example of how even vehicles which use combustion platforms are improved out of sight by full electrification.

Sticking to its brand promise, Volvo offers the full range of active safety equipment on the C40 regardless of variant.

This includes freeway-speed auto emergency braking, rear auto braking, lane keep assist with lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, and one of the best adaptive cruise control systems on the market.

The only item the single motor misses out on is a 360-degree parking camera, which is exclusive to the dual motor variant.

It is notable how the adaptive cruise control, blind spot monitoring rear cross-traffic alert, and rear auto braking are on the options list for the Polestar 2.

These active systems combined with eight airbags (the standard dual front, side, and curtain, as well as a driver’s knee and centre airbag) make for a five-star ANCAP safety rating to the latest 2022 standards.

To tempt electric car skeptics, VW has a range of ownership perks for the ID.4.

What hasn’t changed is the factory warranty which stands at five years and unlimited kilometres, although it does get a separate and industry-standard eight-year and 160,000km warranty for the high-voltage battery pack.

From there though, things are different. The ID.4 only needs to see a workshop once every 24 months or 30,000km, and as usual, servicing can be packaged up to secure the best price at the time of purchase. This is either a six-year/90,000km package ($1785 or $298 per year), an eight-year/120,000km package ($2350 or $294 per year), or a ten-year/150,000km package ($2890 or $289 a year).

VW also points out it has designed its battery pack to be serviceable rather than sealed-for-life or packaged so densely that modules cannot be easily removed, and it guarantees 10 years of battery supply from the end-of-production for the ID.4, with 15 years of repairability to help ease the minds of those convinced modern EV batteries won’t last the distance.

But wait, there’s more, apparently, with VW teaming up with AmpCharge to offer a 7kW home charging unit (which can be themed to match the colour of the car). The first 500 registrations can have one of these installed for free (with a claimed value of $1899).

A five-year warranty will also cover this charging hardware.

The C40 is covered by Volvo’s five year and unlimited kilometre warranty, with a separate eight-year, 160,000km warranty for the battery. There is also eight years of roadside assistance attached.

It is pleasing to see the service intervals for the C40 are long, as they should be for an electric car with so few moving parts, set at two years or 30,000km. 

The first 24 month service is free of charge, and Volvo tells us service pricing after this period will average out to around $100 a year ($200 per visit).