Toyota Prado vs Volvo C40

What's the difference?

Toyota has at last brought the Prado kicking and screaming into the 21st century.

Real improvements in design, tech, comfort and capability have changed what was consistently regarded as a solid off-road tourer and family conveyance into something much better.

This new-generation Prado is the best iteration of this vehicle: roomy and refined, well equipped, nice to drive, and now with a welcome increase in towing capacity, but it is underpowered for something so bulky.

Ultimately it feels like a missed opportunity – Toyota had a chance to rattle the cage with a real game-changer of a vehicle, but the Prado just isn’t that at all and, while it's good, it's not great as we’d all hoped.

The C40 becomes a compelling option in the electrified small SUV space, offering a premium look and feel, great range and tech inclusions at the price, as well as awesome on-road dynamics.

Its main downsides are the rear seat, which is compromised by its platform and design-led roofline, and the overwhelming power and added traction of the dual-motor makes the single motor less attractive on the value front.

Still, regardless of variant chosen, the C40 looks to offer a stand-out balance of price, range, and performance, against its traditional rivals and newcomers alike.

The new Prado is 4990mm long (with a 2850mm wheelbase), 1980mm wide, 1935mm high, and it has a kerb weight of 2520kg. The wheel tracks are 1664mm at the front, and 1668mm at the rear.

As mentioned the Prado now sits on the same platform as the 300 Series so this is not an insubstantial vehicle.

It now has a distinctive chunky, almost straight up and down, old-school look whereas before the Prado carried softer lines.

The heritage square grille is big as is everything else onboard: with bulky wing mirrors, side steps, wheel arches and tyres adding to the vehicle’s wide, squat stance. 

The Prado has rectangular LED headlights in Australia, whereas other markets have the option of the round retro-style lights on their 250 Series.

Overall, the Prado looks even better in the metal than it does in the photos that Toyota fans have been salivating over for so long.

Even with its styling changes and a new fresh all-encompassing look and feel the cabin of the Prado remains comfortably familiar. If you’ve ever spent any length of time in a LandCruiser then you know what I’m talking about.

Build quality is tremendous, fit and finish impressive, the seats are suitably supportive and the Prado’s cabin is an easy space in which to quickly become comfortable.

Volvo has become a brand with a distinctive and consistent design language which embodies the kind of beautiful minimalism normally associated with Scandinavian brands.

I have always liked how Volvo says more with less design elements, with only gentle touches of chrome or gloss black, and a lack of over-the-top sporty pieces avoiding the temptation to over-sell the sporty potential of the brand’s range.

The C40 takes the small SUV formula, well established by its XC40 relation, and gets a bit weird and experimental. It’s slightly lower and has a more coupe-styled rear, with a strongly raked rear window giving it a sportier and more aggressive look than the rest of Volvo’s SUV range.

The styling is sold by an angular spoiler piece running atop the boot, and the rear light clusters have gone all minimalist, constructed of individual pieces rather than a single transparent housing, and they give a nod to the C30 hatchback which this car is the spiritual successor to, by name and nature.

The interior offers up no surprises, sticking to the formula Volvo has established across all of its current models. An effortlessly premium space with, again, a minimalistic dash dominated by the portrait touchscreen, the C40’s premium nature is confirmed by its finely patterned inlays, simple chrome pieces, and abundance of soft-touch surfaces.

The big upright vent fittings with clever rhomboid patterns on their adjustment dials are always a highlight piece of modern Volvos, and the pattern work is continued on the central volume adjust dial and even on the little rotating pieces of the light and wiper stalks. Clever.

Even the software is paired back on the multimedia suite and digital dashboard, with easy to use shortcuts and simple menus which suit the car.

Volvo might turn off some buyers with the more unconventional shape of the C40. But for those looking for a more traditional SUV it also offers the XC40 in the same two variants, and the Polestar 2 caters to those not looking for an SUV at all.

The new Prado has some nice touches over and above the standard features fit-out of lower grades, such as a colour head-up display, digital rear-view mirror, heated steering wheel, power-adjustable steering column, heating and ventilation (front seats), eight-way power-adjustable driver seat and four-way power-adjustable for the front passenger, and genuine leather-accented upholstery throughout.

It also has a deep refrigerated centre console, 14-speaker JBL sound system and a sunroof.

The 12.3-inch multimedia touchscreen dominates the layout upfront and is easy enough to operate, though I did have strife getting Apple CarPlay to work off my phone but the cause was my dodgy old charge cord. 

Speaking of charges, there are six USB-C ports (but no USB-A) in the cabin, and a wireless charger in front of the auto shifter.

There is a 12V DC socket (upfront) and a 220V/100W socket in the rear cargo area.

The second row is a 60:40 split-fold configuration and passengers there have access to aircon controls and directional vents as well as charge points.

Cargo space in the rear is listed as 954L with all seats in use, and 1895L if the second row is folded down. But the rear cargo area is compromised in its packability because of the raised floor (it’s lifted to house the 48-volt V-Active system’s battery) and also the bulky wheel-arch housings. This cargo area is a narrow, shallow space.

The load limit for the raised floor is labelled as 60kg.

There are cupholders at the rear (atop the wheel arch housings), which are leftovers from the three-row layout.

The rear cargo area has a 220V/100W socket, four tie-down points, and a sliding cover to conceal anything that’s left in the back.

There is some very shallow underfloor storage space under the rubber matting.

The rear space can be accessed from outside the vehicle through a window that is operated via a button on the rear door, or the whole rear door can be opened (it swings out from left to right) and locked in place.

The Prado has an underslung full-size spare.

The C40 is essentially a XC40 with a cropped down roofline, and there are some obvious downsides which this new shape brings.

The front seat throws no surprises, though, offering plenty of room for two adults with a welcome level of adjustability for the seat and wheel. The seats could be more comfortable, though, with a notable lack of padding in the base compared to some luxury (or even non-luxury) rivals. 

I’m a fan of the fabric trim which comes on both grades, bucking the trend of needing to have leather or leather-like trim for a car to feel ‘premium’.

The ample window space up front, including the massive glass roof helps the C40’s cabin feel spacious, but the view out the rear with its aggressive design is all but a very limited letterbox aspect, particularly if the rear seat headrests are in the upright position. 

While some controls are exclusively via touch interface, there is a physical volume dial, and shortcut buttons for the defogger functions. 

Temperature is controlled by touch, however, and the detail settings have some smaller toggle adjustments. Tricky to jab at when you’re on the move.

The digital dash is refreshingly simple, but minimally adjustable, with the choice of either a nifty navigation screen, a blank screen, or trip details being the only options.

Cabin storage is good but not stellar. There are bottle holders and big pockets in the doors, a set of two cupholders in the centre (beats the Polestar 2’s single cupholder), a small tray with a wireless charger under the multimedia screen, and a smallish console armrest box.

The rear seat is where the real problem exists. Unlike the XC40, the C40’s cropped roofline means my head was hard up against the roof (I’m 182cm tall). 

I did have decent knee room behind my own seating position, however the seat comfort in the back still isn’t as good as some rivals. 

The middle position is also compromised, thanks to the raised centre floor piece the C40’s platform needs to facilitate all-wheel drive in its combustion relations.

A bottle holder appears in each door pocket, and in a rare inclusion, there are heated outboard rear seats, adjustable air vents, and USB-C charging ports.

The boot has a quoted capacity of 413 litres with the rear seats up. The floor is comparatively high suggesting a smallish space when loaded with luggage cases, for instance. Stay tuned for a follow-up review so we can see how well it holds our three-piece demo set.

The floor itself has an adjustable, pop-up divider and multiple luggage hooks, making it quite versatile, and there is a cavity beneath which can hold your charging cables as well as the inflator kit in place of a spare wheel.

When it comes to electric vehicles, it’s impossible to consider price alone, as you also have to consider driving range, and the C40 manages to impress on both fronts.

Its refreshingly simplified range consists of just two highly-specified variants, a single motor which starts from $74,990, offering a 434km driving range, or a dual motor starting from $82,490 which offers a 420km driving range.

There’s much more devil in the detail, but to set the scene there are now quite a few direct rivals in this price-bracket, including everything from the Tesla Model Y (from $72,300), Mercedes-Benz EQA (from $78,513), Polestar 2 (from $63,900) and even the Kia Niro which is similarly sized and specified (from $65,300).

Interestingly, the C40 is closely related to the Polestar 2, but has a much higher base starting price. Volvo says this is because it carries a higher standard specification, and offers the C40 without option packs.

Standard gear on the base single motor C40 includes 19-inch alloy wheels, a 9.0-inch portrait multimedia touchscreen (running a Google-based always-online software suite), LED headlights, dual-zone climate control, a fixed panoramic sunroof, electrically adjustable front seats, heated seats for the front two and outboard rear seats, a powered tailgate, as well as keyless entry with touch-free ignition.

Interestingly, Volvo also told us some 90 per cent of customer interest so far has been for the more expensive dual-motor variant, which is particularly impressive for doubling the power output while adding 20-inch alloy wheels, a 360-degree parking suite, premium Harmon Kardon audio, and an alternate interior trim.

Both variants score safety equipment and items which are otherwise part of expensive option packs in the Polestar 2 range. We’ll take a look at the full safety gear later in this review.

Overall, the C40 impresses on the premium car value front compared to rivals, bolstered by solid range and impressive performance.

The 250 Series Prado has 2.8-litre four-cylinder diesel engine – producing 150kW and 500Nm – with Toyota’s 48-volt V-Active technology. 

V-Active technology comprises a motor generator, 48-Volt battery and DC/DC converter which enables a stop/start system and this set-up is “designed to offer … improvements in driveability, performance, fuel efficiency and noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) compared with the standard 2.8-litre turbo-diesel engine”, Toyota reckons.

The 48-volt V-Active technology essentially amounts to a stop-start system aimed at reducing fuel consumption, but it doesn’t add anything in terms of performance.

What’s more, it takes up space in the engine bay and the system’s 48V lithium battery weighs 7.6kg, so the total weight of the system – between 30-35kg, as estimated by Toyota – has to be taken into account when you’re aiming to load within the Prado’s 580kg payload.

It has an eight-speed automatic transmission and a full-time dual-range four-wheel-drive system. 

This engine and auto arrangement is generally impressive – smooth, with plenty of torque across a wide rev range. It does, however, feel underpowered and it needs extra encouragement (heavy right boot) to get off the mark – but it otherwise yields a controlled and refined driving experience, especially on the open road at highway speeds.

Great news here, the C40 can be chosen with two powerful layouts, either a front-wheel drive 170kW/330Nm set-up, or a dual-motor all-wheel drive arrangement, able to make use of nearly double the power at 300kW/660Nm. The dual-motor is capable of sprinting from 0-100km/h in just 4.7 seconds.

The front-drive is backed by a 69kWh battery allowing it a 434km range, while the dual motor ups the battery size to 78kWh to allow a 420km driving range.

The Toyota LandCruiser Prado has an official fuel consumption of 7.6L/100km (on a combined cycle).

I recorded 10.4L/100km on this test. I did a lot of high- and low-range 4WDing and the Prado was never working hard.

The Prado has a 110L fuel tank so, going by my on-test fuel-consumption figure, you could reasonably expect a driving range of about 1057km from a full tank. 

It has a 17.4-litre AdBlue tank.

Surprisingly, energy consumption is quite high for both C40 variants. The single motor is the more efficient of the two, consuming 16.8kWh/100km on the more lenient ADR testing schedule, while the dual motor officially consumes 22.2kWh/100km to the same standard. I saw around 23kWh/100km overall in my short test of the dual-motor variant.

Energy consumption could be better for both, as I have achieved more consistently impressive results particularly from Hyundai and Kia electric cars.

Where the C40 is more impressive though is its charging specs, which are exactly where they need to be for a car this size. On a rapid DC charger, the C40 can charge at a rate of 150kW meaning a 10 - 80 percent charge in 40 minutes for the dual motor, or 32 minutes for the single motor.

On the slower AC standard, the C40 charges at a rate of 11kW. Expect a 10 - 80 percent charge time of around five or six hours on this standard. 

The C40 uses a European-standard Type 2 CCS charging port, although it misses out on the handy two-way charging feature offered by some rivals.

Previous generations of Prado were never atrocious on road, but there was always substantial body roll, it was a bit floaty and it was one of those four-wheel drive wagons that, on sealed surfaces, tended to feel like a couch on wheels.

That’s no longer the case because this new-generation Prado is well controlled, well composed in all scenarios and it really is nice to drive – even when you move from bitumen onto a dirt track and you can still keep up a fair bit of speed.

On the new chassis the Prado feels settled, nicely controlled and that well-weighted steering has an even balance to it, especially when things become a little bit lumpy and bumpy here and there. 

And most of that ol’ Prado body roll that was evident in previous iterations has been ironed out.

Past generations of Prados weren't ordinary in the off-road department, not by a long shot. And this new Prado has improved on the proven formula of those previous generations: from its mechanical foundations, plenty of low-down torque through to its selectable driving modes (rock, sand, mud), the Prado is well equipped to tackle pretty much any off-road circumstance you can conjure with your over-active imagination. 

Now, with the added bonus of new and improved suspension and a sway bar disconnect system, those factors have bolstered the vehicle skill-set that's already there.

There is plenty of driver visibility through the cabin to the front, to the sides and to the rear. So you can see everything. But as well as that, you also have the valuable addition of new driver-assist technology, including the multi terrain monitor camera system to make sure you can scrutinise any sight lines that you may not be able to see naturally from the driver's. 

The steering feels sharp, it's well weighted and balanced and with a longer wheelbase on this chassis the Prado’s body always feels controlled and composed on fast dirt roads or through low-speed four-wheel-driving situations. 

The eight-speed automatic transmission is very clever and works well in conjunction with the aforementioned selectable driving modes, which tweak engine output, transmission response and throttle control. 

The Altitude is the most off-road-focused of the line-up and to that end it has a centre diff lock, rear diff lock and swaybar disconnect system – and all those elements add up to a nice bonus for a vehicle that has always been a decent off-road tourer. 

So it has plenty going for it, but it’s not all good news though. 

Toyota reckons it's V-Active system is aimed at fuel consumption but it also helps to produce a little more torque in off-road situations during which you may need extra torque. 

But I've seen no real discernible difference in terms of performance, at those low speeds coming from that unit. It may be so seamless that you don't notice it at all, but I've only noticed that the Prado has performed as it should with that engine and that transmission on board. 

I can't credit any improvements in performance to that 48 volt unit that's now on board. 

The Prado is compromised by ground clearance and off-road angles that are more suited to a city-friendly vehicle than a purpose-built off-road vehicle. 

Having said that, ground clearance is fairly standard for a large four-wheel-drive wagon – it sits at a listed 221mm off the dirt, which is satisfactory – and it has a wading depth of about 700mm. 

The off-road angles of approach (32 degrees) and departure (17 degrees) are also standard for this class and size of vehicle, although especially in this Altitude, the departure angle has been somewhat compromised because of the underslung tyre and the addition of optional accessories (towing kit etc) on this text vehicle.

The Prado’s ramp-over angle is not listed but this new-generation Prado, with its longer 300 Series-size wheelbase, likely offers about 21 degrees.

The underbody does at times feel quite low and vulnerable to hitting the ground, even though underbody protection is quite substantial.

It's Toyo Tires Open Country A/T (all-terrain) tyres (265/70R18 116H) are perfectly fine for most off-road scenarios, but you can always do more and go further with a set of better, more aggressive all-terrain tyres, especially some light-truck construction rubber. 

It's bulky sidesteps, while handy for getting in and out of the vehicle itself, can also be considered vulnerable to damage – and are prone to rubbing against rocks through tight rutted climbs, that sort of thing.

But those aspects aren't deal-breakers, and a lot of the Prado’s shortcomings – ground clearance, off-road angles, tyres – can be easily resolved with a visit to Australia's aftermarket industry.

And despite those minor niggles I did have a lot of fun driving this Prado.

For those looking to use their Prado as a towing platform, the good news is it can now legally tow the segment standard maximum of 3500kg (braked) (up from the previous generation's 3000kg) and it has a pre-wired and integrated towbar.

Payload is listed as 580kg, GVM is 3100kg, and GCM is 6600kg.

If you’ve driven any kind of XC40 or even a Polestar 2 before, the C40 will offer no surprises. It’s pretty much exactly the same from behind the wheel with a few subtle tweaks.

This is a very good thing. The C40 is quiet, easy to drive, and its electric motor and regen system offer a smooth single-pedal experience.

It is also alarmingly, overwhelmingly, rapid. While its massive set of batteries under the floor make it feel heavy off the line in stop-start traffic, sticking your boot into the accelerator will remove any doubt, particularly in the dual-motor variant, that this Volvo means business.

The dual-motor also has an incredible torque-vectoring system, making it extremely difficult to elicit so much as a squeak from its tyres. It also feels as though torque is distributed quite evenly between its two driven axles, making it feel neither prone to over- or understeer.

This has the effect of making the C40 feel somewhat indestructible in the corners, with absurd levels of grip. 

The same feeling is present in top-spec versions of the Polestar 2, only the feeling of ever-present weight is more noticeable in the higher-riding C40, which can make it unsettling to take corners at the kinds of speeds it is capable of.

The steering tune is interesting. Volvo offers two software-controlled modes, either heavy or standard, and the standard mode is heavy enough. 

Despite its electrical assistance, the wheel does continue to offer some organic feedback, making the C40 a pleasure to steer on countryside roads.

The ride is also surprisingly good, despite massive wheel options. I was impressed how easily the C40 handled most bumps and undulations, communicating little to the cabin. 

The ride can approach its limits with such big wheels and the weight of its batteries, generally these are communicated via unsettling thuds from underneath the car. Regular undulations at higher speeds also had the C40 bouncing around a little.

On the whole, though, the cabin is kept relatively insulated and serene, adding an element of total confidence, similar to that offered by Teslas, whilst offering better ride quality with a softer edge. At higher speed, at least on the 20-inch wheels, road noise does pick up, however.

In terms of electric driving, there is a single adjustable setting for regen. The car either offers a full single pedal mode with maximum regenerative braking to bring the car to a halt with the motor alone, or a ‘standard’ mode which tones the regen down and offers it blended in via the brake pedal. 

Single pedal mode is more efficient. I suggest you stick to it if you want to make the most of this car’s efficiency.

I was surprised to have so few complaints about the C40’s drive experience. This is a balanced and capable EV which is yet another example of how even vehicles which use combustion platforms are improved out of sight by full electrification.

Sticking to its brand promise, Volvo offers the full range of active safety equipment on the C40 regardless of variant.

This includes freeway-speed auto emergency braking, rear auto braking, lane keep assist with lane departure warning, blind spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, and one of the best adaptive cruise control systems on the market.

The only item the single motor misses out on is a 360-degree parking camera, which is exclusive to the dual motor variant.

It is notable how the adaptive cruise control, blind spot monitoring rear cross-traffic alert, and rear auto braking are on the options list for the Polestar 2.

These active systems combined with eight airbags (the standard dual front, side, and curtain, as well as a driver’s knee and centre airbag) make for a five-star ANCAP safety rating to the latest 2022 standards.

The Prado is covered by Toyota’s five year/unlimited km warranty.

Servicing is scheduled for every six months or 10,000km and, under Toyota’s capped-price servicing, each of the first 10 services costs $390.

The 48-volt battery set-up is covered by a five year/unlimited km warranty. 

The C40 is covered by Volvo’s five year and unlimited kilometre warranty, with a separate eight-year, 160,000km warranty for the battery. There is also eight years of roadside assistance attached.

It is pleasing to see the service intervals for the C40 are long, as they should be for an electric car with so few moving parts, set at two years or 30,000km. 

The first 24 month service is free of charge, and Volvo tells us service pricing after this period will average out to around $100 a year ($200 per visit).